Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
John Drake (2012)
A Critical Analysis of Active Learning and an Alternative Pedagogical Framework for Introductory Information Systems CoursesJ. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract., 11
T.M. Duffy, D.H. Jonassen (1992)
Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage?Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation
K. Rouibah (2015)
Issues in Information Systems
Naveen Gudigantala (2013)
An Active Learning Approach to Teaching Undergraduate Introduction to MIS Course
Shouhong Wang (2007)
An Examination of the Introductory MIS CourseJ. Inf. Technol. Educ., 6
James Downey, R. McGaughey, Dave Roach (2011)
Attitudes and Influences toward Choosing a Business Major: The Case of Information SystemsJ. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., 10
M. Mohamed (2020)
Persuasion of tacit knowledge in teaching information technology and information systems
Catherine Chen (2002)
Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Achievement in an Introduction to Information Systems Course, 20
Y. Djajalaksana (2011)
A national survey of instructional strategies used to teach information systems course: an exploratory investigation
B. Zimmerman, Rafael Risemberg (1997)
Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation.
D. Perkins (1991)
Technology Meets Constructivism: Do They Make a Marriage?Educational Technology archive, 31
P. Pintrich, E. Groot (1990)
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82
K. Rouibah (2012)
Understanding student drivers and obstacles toward MIS major from the perspective of an Arab country: the case of KuwaitIssues in Information Systems, 13
D. Livingstone, K. Lynch (2000)
Group Project Work and Student-centred Active Learning: Two different experiencesStudies in Higher Education, 25
Wei Zhang (2007)
Why IS: Understanding Undergraduate Students' Intentions to Choose an Information Systems MajorJ. Inf. Syst. Educ., 18
L. Shell, Betty Kleen (2016)
Innovative Pedagogies for Outcomes-Based Teaching in the Core Mis CourseJournal of Computer Information Systems
Anthony Keys (2003)
Using Group Projects in MIS: Strategies for Instruction and ManagementJournal of Computer Information Systems, 43
L. Shulman (2005)
Signature pedagogies in the professionsDaedalus, 134
Liang Chen, C. Holsapple (2014)
Teaching the Introductory MIS Course: An MIs Approach
Lei Li, N. Thomson (2011)
Why Business Students Select MIS as Their Major – An Empirical Examination
Teaching management information systems (MIS) fundamental course remains a challenging task to date, encountering several continuing complaints from students as well as instructors, as per several studies. Several reasons are reported, some of which are related to little embrace of more innovative non-traditional techniques, and limited literature guidance on selection and effective use of appropriate strategies to various settings. Toward instructional innovation, this paper proposes and tests a pedagogical instrument. By introducing this tool, the ultimate objective is to minimize the confusion that students usually encounter during this course and to empower the instructors in the delivery of its interdisciplinary knowledge.Design/methodology/approachA triangulation of four methods is being employed: conceptual development, experimentation for 12 years, assessment in light of the self-regulated learning theory, and empirical analysis. For the latter method, an open-ended questionnaire as well as group interviewing were carried out.FindingsThe proposed instrument (need-function instrument [NFI]) was found to be in support of self-regulated learning to a promising extent in terms of its four core aspects. The participants were more inclined to accept as well as appreciate the instrument than report drawbacks. Yet, there are few complaints for the inability to distinguish between two introduced terms, ‘Information Problem’ and ‘Operations Problem’. Therefore, a future effort is deemed necessary to explore this aspect.Research limitations/implicationsThe results are based on a single case of educational institution which is not enough to generalize for other educational environments. Future research is necessary for testing in a variety of settings in terms of type of classroom, number of students enrolled, type of institution (public or private), etc.Practical implicationsWhereas the instrument is anticipated to render improvements in the students’ understanding of MIS content and to alleviate the task of the course leader in delivering the course, there are possible practical implications that should be paid careful attention to. They were analyzed in terms of four dimensions: the Instructor, the Student, the Classroom and Time.Originality/valueThe paper introduces a new pedagogical instrument/tool for teaching the MIS fundamental course.
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 19, 2024
Keywords: Information problem; MIS course; NFI instrument; Self-regulated learning; Teaching MIS; IS education
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.