Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
I. La Valle (2016)
Final evaluation of the paving the way project: early intervention for children with learning disabilities whose behaviour challenges
A. Donabedian (1966)
Evaluating the quality of medical care.The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly, 44 3
Kathy Lowe, David Allen, David Allen, Edwin Jones, Edwin Jones, Sam Brophy, Kate Moore, W. James (2007)
Challenging behaviours: prevalence and topographies.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 51 Pt 8
G. Chowdhury, Kushwanth Koya, P. Philipson (2016)
Measuring the Impact of Research: Lessons from the UK’s Research Excellence Framework 2014PLoS ONE, 11
R. Hastings, D. Allen, Peter Baker, N. Gore, J. Hughes, P. McGill, S. Noone, S. Toogood (2013)
A conceptual framework for understanding why challenging behaviours occur in people with developmental disabilities
J. McLaughlin, Gretchen Jordan (1999)
Logic models: a tool for telling your programs performance storyEvaluation and Program Planning, 22
D. Bowring, V. Totsika, R. Hastings, S. Toogood, M. McMahon (2017)
Prevalence of psychotropic medication use and association with challenging behaviour in adults with an intellectual disability. A total population studyJournal of Intellectual Disability Research, 61
J. Loon, G. Bonham, D. Peterson, R. Schalock, C. Claes, Adelien Decramer (2013)
The use of evidence-based outcomes in systems and organizations providing services and supports to persons with intellectual disability.Evaluation and program planning, 36 1
(2011)
Assessment framework and guidance on submissions
R. Schalock, K. Keith, M. Verdugo, L. Gómez (2010)
Quality of Life Model Development and Use in the Field of Intellectual Disability
(2015)
Positive Behavioural Support (PBS): a competence framework
M. Porter (1989)
How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy
(2018)
Assessing the impact of the UK Positive Behavioural Support (PBS) Academy: an internet survey
D. Allen, P. McGill, R. Hastings, S. Toogood, Peter Baker, N. Gore, J. Hughes (2013)
Implementing positive behavioural support : changing social and organisational contexts
N. Gore, P. McGill, S. Toogood, D. Allen, J. Hughes, Peter Baker, R. Hastings, S. Noone, L. Denne (2013)
Definition and scope for positive behavioural support, 3
S. Galam, M. Javarone (2015)
Modeling Radicalization Phenomena in Heterogeneous PopulationsPLoS ONE, 11
Karen Shakman, S. Rodriguez (2015)
Logic Models for Program Design, Implementation, and Evaluation: Workshop Toolkit. REL 2015-057.
K. Shakman, S.M. Rodriguez (2015)
Logic model for program design, implementation and evaluation: workshop toolkit
A. Donabedian (2005)
Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.The Milbank quarterly, 83 4
(2015)
Building the right support: a national plan to develop community services and close inpatient facilities for people with a learning disability and/or autism who display behaviour that challenges, including those with a mental health condition
L. Denne, S. Noone, N. Gore, S. Toogood, J. Hughes, R. Hastings, D. Allen, Peter Baker, P. McGill (2013)
Developing a core competencies framework for positive behavioural support : issues and recommendations, 3
(2016)
The adult social care workforce supporting people with learning disabilities and/or autism. data from the national minimum data set for social care
(2016)
Time for change: the challenge ahead
(2015)
The state of the adult social care sector and workforce report in England, 2014
(2015)
Putting positive behavioural support into practice: the challenges of workforce training and development
Measuring “impact” is an important aspect of the dissemination of evidence-based practice and relevant to all disciplines. However, it has only recently become a focus of enquiry and is not commonly directly researched within the learning disabilities field. The purpose of this paper is to describe the process of developing a logic model for the UK Positive Behavioural Support (PBS) Academy as part of an evaluation and impact study of its work to date.Design/methodology/approachLogic models are a visual representation of the relationship between a project’s resources, activities and outputs and identified outcomes, in relation to key stakeholder groups. This representation allows for key impact measures to be identified and can be a useful tool for evaluation purposes. The authors used the process outlined by McLaughlin and Jordan (1998) to develop a bespoke logic model for the PBS Academy.FindingsThe model was particularly helpful in making clear the distinction between output and impact, identifying impact criteria differentiated by stakeholder group and across time scales, and highlighting areas of activity that are needed to increase the impact of the work of the PBS Academy in the longer term.Originality/valueIn the absence of any generalised impact evaluation frameworks in the learning disabilities field, the authors suggest that logic models may provide a useful framework for evaluating the impact of policy, practice, and research interventions.
Tizard Learning Disability Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 22, 2018
Keywords: Evaluation; Learning disabilities; Logic model; PBS Academy; Positive Behavioural Support (PBS)
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.