Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Edwin Locke, M. Taylor (1991)
7. Stress, Coping, and the Meaning of Work
T. Rath, James Harter (2010)
Wellbeing: The Five Essential Elements
F. Glen (1976)
The social psychology of organizations
A. Richman, Janet Civian, Laurie Shannon, E. Hill, R. Brennan (2008)
The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work–life policies, and use of formal flexible arrangements and occasional flexibility to employee engagement and expected retentionCommunity, Work & Family, 11
John Delery, D. Doty (1996)
Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictionsAcademy of Management Journal, 39
S. Islam, S. Shazali (2011)
Determinants of manufacturing productivity: pilot study on labor-intensive industriesInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60
Douglas May, R. Gilson, L. Harter (2004)
The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work, 77
Hillary Hertzog, Margo Pensavalle, J. Lemlech (2000)
Collegial Relationships: What Does It Mean To Be a Colleague?.
Fred Walumbwa, B. Avolio, W. Gardner, Tara Wernsing, S. Peterson (2008)
Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure†Journal of Management, 34
R. Joshi, J. Sodhi (2011)
Drivers of Employee Engagement in Indian OrganizationsThe Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 47
M. Welch
The evolution of the employee engagement concept: communication implications
R. Cardy, B. Leonard (2004)
Performance management : concepts, skills, and exercises
B. Rich, Jeffrey LePine, Eean Crawford (2010)
JOB ENGAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND EFFECTS ON JOB PERFORMANCEAcademy of Management Journal, 53
J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, W.C. Black
Multivariate Analysis
(2011)
The Winning Way
James Harter, F. Schmidt, Corey Keyes (2003)
Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies.
E. Deci, R. Ryan (1987)
The support of autonomy and the control of behavior.Journal of personality and social psychology, 53 6
(2003)
Multivariate Analysis, Pearson Education Inc, Delhi
(2010)
Work engagement: introduction
W. Macey, B. Schneider (2008)
The Meaning of Employee EngagementIndustrial and Organizational Psychology, 1
L. Holbeche, N. Springett
In Search of Meaning in the Workplace
(2004)
“ Research brief : employee engagement higher at double - digit growth companies ”
C.P. Alderfer
Human Needs in Organisational Settings
(2008)
Influences engagement”, ASTD
V. Devi (2009)
Employee engagement is a two‐way streetHuman Resource Management International Digest, 17
M. Buckingham, Curt Coffman (1999)
First, Break All the Rules: What the World's Greatest Managers Do Differently
C. Maslach, Wilmar Schaufeli, M. Leiter (2001)
Job burnout.Annual review of psychology, 52
T. Buchner (2007)
Performance management theory: A look from the performer's perspective with implications for HRDHuman Resource Development International, 10
E. Lawler (2008)
Make Human Capital a Source of Competitive AdvantageUSC Marshall School of Business Research Paper Series
(2003)
In Search of Meaning in the Workplace, Horsham
(1972)
Human Needs in Organisational Settings, Free Press of Glencoe
J. Halbesleben (2010)
A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences.
C. Woodruffe (2005)
Employee Engagement - the Real Secret of Winning a Crucial Edge over Your Rivals
E. Demerouti, R. Cropanzano (2010)
From thought to action : employee work engagement and job performance
(2003)
) , “ Working today : understanding what drives employee engagement ”
W. Macey, B. Schneider, Karen Barbera, S. Young (2009)
Employee Engagement: Tools for Analysis, Practice, and Competitive Advantage
William Kahn (1990)
Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at WorkAcademy of Management Journal, 33
A. Saks (2006)
Antecedents and consequences of employee engagementJournal of Managerial Psychology, 21
Gary Heiman (1997)
Understanding Research Methods and Statistics: An Integrated Introduction for Psychology
Michael Christian, Adela Garza, J. Slaughter (2011)
WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCEPersonnel Psychology, 64
(2007)
Human sigma
M. Welch (2011)
Chapter 69: The evolution of the employee engagement concept: communication implications
(2007)
The high cost of disengaged employees ”
W. Schaufeli, A. Bakker (2010)
Defining and measuring work engagement : Bringing clarity to the concept
H. Presser (2019)
From the authorAutomatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 42
S. Richardson (2010)
Employee Engagement: Through Effective Performance Management – A Practical Guide for ManagersErgonomics, 53
Marie Carasco-Saul, Woocheol Kim, T. Kim (2015)
Leadership and Employee EngagementHuman Resource Development Review, 14
(2004)
The missing link: the role of employee engagement in business success
(2009)
Driving customer satisfaction and financial success through employee engagement
A Paradise
Influences engagement
(2006)
Everyone wants an engaged workforce how can you create it?
R. Miles (2001)
Beyond the age of Dilbert: accelerating corporate transformations by rapidly engaging all employeesOrganizational Dynamics, 29
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the key determinants of employee engagement and their predictability of the concept. It also studies the impact of employee engagement on employee performance. Design/methodology/approach – Causal study was done to study the impact of relationships. A survey questionnaire was developed and validated using a pilot data ( a =0.975). Simple random sampling was used to select the employees from middle and lower managerial levels from small‐scale organisations. A total of 700 questionnaires were distributed and 383 valid responses collected. Regression and structural equation modelling were used to predict and estimate the relationships. Findings – It was found that all the identified factors were predictors of employee engagement ( r 2 , 0.672), however, the variables that had major impact were working environment and team and co‐worker relationship. Employee engagement had significant impact on employee performance ( r 2 , 0.597). Practical implications – Special focus and effort is required specifically on the factors working‐environment and team and co‐worker relationship as they have shown significantly higher impact on employee engagement and hence employee performance. Organisations shall focus on presenting a great environment for employees to work and promote programmes that would enhance peer relationships. Social implications – The determinants of employee engagement connote a healthy working atmosphere that reflects on the social impact created by the organisation. Employees would enjoy considerable attention in terms of the determinants being addressed. Originality/value – The research emphasises the growing importance and need for crystallisation of the concept of employee engagement. The research is unique in respect to the comprehensive model that is developed and validated.
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 8, 2014
Keywords: Employee engagement; Employee performance; Team and co‐worker relationship; Working environment
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.