Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Destination leadership and the issue of power

Destination leadership and the issue of power Purpose – Studies of destination management and leadership may over‐emphasize unity and collaboration, thus producing romanticized accounts for such processes. This paper discusses destination leadership from a less romanticized perspective – pointing to the various ways in which it intertwines with power. Design/methodology/approach – The authors focus on the relationship between destination leadership and power networks offering a fresh look at the reality of collaborative processes in destinations. By exposing the latent or manifest networks of complex power relations in destinations, the authors disentangle the analysis of destination management and leadership from romanticized perspectives. A non‐conventional vignettes approach is applied. Findings – The concept of power offers more realistic descriptions and “thick” conceptualizations of destination leadership. Moreover, the predominance of more inclusive and bottom‐up approaches to destination development necessitates advances in understandings of power relations at work at the destination. Furthermore, if DMOs are to successfully establish themselves as destination leaders, they need to position themselves in the midst of the power networks entailing relationships and interactions with and between destination stakeholders. Originality/value – The paper demonstrates that power is not a characteristic of individual actors, but is instead a characteristic of relations. Moreover, power is defined as a potential and might therefore be latent and only occasionally be activated. Furthermore, in a destination multiple power‐relations co‐exist, effecting attempts to lead the destination. Therefore, the paper points to the existence of a series of bases of power and effects hereof on destination leadership. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Tourism Review Emerald Publishing

Destination leadership and the issue of power

Bodil Stilling Blichfeldt; John Hird; Peter Kvistgaard
Tourism Review , Volume 69 (1): 13 – Apr 14, 2014
Download PDF
13 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/destination-leadership-and-the-issue-of-power-id73Yd3WMK
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1660-5373
DOI
10.1108/TR-06-2013-0025
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – Studies of destination management and leadership may over‐emphasize unity and collaboration, thus producing romanticized accounts for such processes. This paper discusses destination leadership from a less romanticized perspective – pointing to the various ways in which it intertwines with power. Design/methodology/approach – The authors focus on the relationship between destination leadership and power networks offering a fresh look at the reality of collaborative processes in destinations. By exposing the latent or manifest networks of complex power relations in destinations, the authors disentangle the analysis of destination management and leadership from romanticized perspectives. A non‐conventional vignettes approach is applied. Findings – The concept of power offers more realistic descriptions and “thick” conceptualizations of destination leadership. Moreover, the predominance of more inclusive and bottom‐up approaches to destination development necessitates advances in understandings of power relations at work at the destination. Furthermore, if DMOs are to successfully establish themselves as destination leaders, they need to position themselves in the midst of the power networks entailing relationships and interactions with and between destination stakeholders. Originality/value – The paper demonstrates that power is not a characteristic of individual actors, but is instead a characteristic of relations. Moreover, power is defined as a potential and might therefore be latent and only occasionally be activated. Furthermore, in a destination multiple power‐relations co‐exist, effecting attempts to lead the destination. Therefore, the paper points to the existence of a series of bases of power and effects hereof on destination leadership.

Journal

Tourism Review – Emerald Publishing

Published: Apr 14, 2014

Keywords: Power; Destination leadership; Latent power; Power networks; Relational power; Non‐decisions

References

  • On Violence
    Arendt, H.
  • Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice
    Bachrach, P.; Baratz, M.
  • Critical success factors in destination marketing
    Baker, M.J.; Cameron, E.
  • Power dimensions and influence reputation in tourist destinations: empirical evidence from a network of actors and stakeholders
    Beritelli, P.; Laesser, C.
  • Unmanageable place brands?
    Blichfeldt, B.S.
  • Power and tourism policy relations in transition
    Bramwell, B.; Meyer, D.
  • Collaboration in local tourism policy‐making
    Bramwell, B.; Sharman, A.
  • Coordinating relationships among destination stakeholders: evidence from Edinburgh (UK)
    Bregoli, I.; del Chiappa, G.
  • Collaboration as a partnership
    Campbell, J.; Dienermann, J.; Kub, J.; Wurmser, T.; Loy, E.
  • Tourism, Power and Space
    Church, A.; Coles, T.
  • The concept of power
    Dahl, R.
  • Power‐dependence relations
    Emerson, R.M.
  • The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes
    Etzioni, A.
  • The vignette technique in survey research
    Finch, J.
  • Tourism Planning – Basics, Concepts, Cases
    Gunn, C.A.
  • Tourism and Politics: Policy, Power and Place
    Hall, C.M.
  • Politics and place: an analysis of power in tourism communities
    Hall, C.M.
  • Managing destination brands: establishing a theoretical foundation
    Hankinson, G.
  • Responsible and responsive tourism planning in the community
    Haywood, K.M.
  • Research review: participatory research with children
    Hill, M.
  • Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behavior
    Hughes, R.
  • Destination marketing organizations – connecting the experience rather than promoting the place
    King, J.
  • Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives
    Long, N.
  • Power – A Radical View
    Lukes, S.
  • Power in destination branding
    Marzano, G.; Scott, N.
  • A global sense of place
    Massey, D.
  • Conflict resolution in agriculture: a matter of trust
    Millar, C.; Aiken, D.
  • Destination branding and the role of the stakeholders: the case of New Zealand
    Morgan, N.; Pritchard, A.; Piggott, R.
  • Tourism: A Community Approach
    Murphy, P.
  • Power, trust, social exchange and community support
    Nunkoo, R.; Ramkissoon, H.
  • Public trust in tourism institutions
    Nunkoo, R.; Ramkissoon, H.; Gursoy, D.
  • Destinations' perspectives on branding
    Park, S.‐Y.; Petrick, J.F.
  • Tourism destination branding complexity
    Pike, S.
  • Legitimate power, coercive power, and observability in social influence
    Raven, B.H.; French, J.R.P. Jr
  • Organizational Behavior: Concepts‐controversies‐applications
    Robbins, S.
  • Governance: a review and synthesis of the literature
    Ruhanen, L.; Scott, N.; Ritchie, B.; Tkaczynski, A.
  • The Tourist Image: Myths and Mythmaking in Tourism
    Selwyn, T.
  • The destination promotion triad: understanding asymmetric stakeholder interdependencies among the city, hotels, and DMO
    Sheehan, L.; Ritchie, J.R.B.; Hudson, S.
  • The context of satisficing in vignette research
    Stolte, J.F.
  • Cooperative tourism planning in a developing destination
    Timothy, D.
  • The Social Psychology of Organizing
    Weick, K.
  • Power, Its Forms, Bases, and Uses
    Wrong, D.