Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Gregor, A. Hevner (2013)
Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum ImpactMIS Q., 37
Sari Kujala, Marjo Kauppinen, L. Lehtola, T. Kojo (2005)
The role of user involvement in requirements quality and project success13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE'05)
T. Henriques, Henrique O'Neill (2015)
The Human side of Information Systems: capitalizing on People, as a basis for Organization Development and Holistic Change
N. Prat, I. Comyn-Wattiau, J. Akoka (2014)
Artifact Evaluation in Information Systems Design-Science Research - a Holistic View
O. Gotel, A. Finkelstein (1994)
An analysis of the requirements traceability problemProceedings of IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering
(1990)
Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology
(2020)
Systemic Lisbon battery: Definição de Problema, Requisitos e Solução
J. Carr (2000)
Requirements engineering and management: the key to designing quality complex systemsThe Tqm Magazine, 12
Monica Tremblay, A. Hevner, D. Berndt (2010)
Focus Groups for Artifact Refinement and Evaluation in Design ResearchCommun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 26
O. Gotel, J. Cleland-Huang, J. Hayes, A. Zisman, Alexander Egyed, P. Grünbacher, G. Antoniol (2012)
The quest for Ubiquity: A roadmap for software and systems traceability research2012 20th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)
B. Nuseibeh, S. Easterbrook (2000)
Requirements engineering: a roadmap
Nermina Durmic, Herzegovina (2020)
Information Systems Project Success Factors: Literature Review, 2
A. Hevner (2007)
A Three Cycle View of Design Science ResearchScandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19
Philipp Offermann, Olga Levina, M. Schönherr, Udo Bub (2009)
Outline of a design science research process
(2010)
Critical success factors for professional requirements management
K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. Rothenberger, S. Chatterjee (2007)
A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems ResearchJournal of Management Information Systems, 24
J. Aken (2004)
Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological RulesJournal of Management Studies, 41
A. Giessmann, Christine Legner (2016)
Designing business models for cloud platformsInformation Systems Journal, 26
(2020)
Action, design and research – a logical data model
A. Hevner, S. Chatterjee (2010)
Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice
T. Henriques, Henrique O'Neill (2014)
IT Quality and Organizational Development – using Action Research to promote Employee Engagement, Leadership development, Learning and Organizational Improvement
The purpose of this research paper is to present a pragmatic and systematic approach to conduct and document Design Science Research (DSR) activities with Focus Groups (FGs), exploring its continuous usage and providing traceability between problem, requirements, solutions and artefacts.Design/methodology/approachThe approach is to conduct the research and produce the meta-model for DSR with FG, a DSR approach was adopted using a conceptual model for Action Design Research already available. The artefact is the result from a specific literature review to define requirements, a careful design and a refinement stage where it was widely used and tested in real IS implementation projects.FindingsRigorous and committed stakeholder engagement is a critical success factor in complex projects. The main outcome of this research is a specific meta-model for DSR with FG that delivers new insights and practical guidelines for academics and professionals conducting and documenting real-world research and development initiatives deep-rooted in stakeholders' participation.Research limitations/implicationsThe meta-model has been endorsed as a practical and useful artefact by the stakeholders participating in the IS projects where it was adopted. However, to fully demonstrate its capabilities and to become more robust, the model has to be further used and tested in other application situations and environments.Originality/valueThe usage of FGs in DSR has already been proposed as an effective way, either to study artefacts, to propose improvements in its design or to acknowledge the utility of those artefacts in field use. The paper provides a sound contribution to this line of research by presenting a meta-model that integrates process and data, as well as a set of practical templates and forms that may be used by researchers and practitioners to conduct their projects.
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 1, 2023
Keywords: Design science research; Focus groups; Stakeholder involvement; Co-creating knowledge; Process model; Data model
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.