Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2016)
The emotional politics of the EU Referendum : Bregrexit [ sic ] and beyond ‖
Journalism Studies
T. Honderich (1995)
The Oxford Companion to Philosophy
(2017)
Alternative facts and fake news – verifiability in the Information Society‖, IFLA Library Policy and Advocacy Blog, 27 January, available
(2017)
Postmodernism (Philosophy)‖, Encyclopedia Britannica
A. Chris, A. Arjun (1996)
Long Tail: How Endless Choice is Creating Unlimited Demand, London: Random House.
B. Nyhan, Jason Reifler (2010)
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political MisperceptionsPolitical Behavior, 32
Brian Ott (2017)
The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasementCritical Studies in Media Communication, 34
Want to make a lie seem true? Say it again. and again. and again‖, WIRED
(2001)
Quotes about libraries and democracy
(2000)
Unfulfilled propecies and
N. Kranich (2001)
Libraries & democracy : the cornerstones of liberty
(2016)
Why won‘t Donald Trump denounce Sandy Hook deniers?
M. Haigh, T. Haigh, N. Kozak (2017)
Stopping Fake NewsJournalism Studies, 19
Chris Anderson (2006)
The long tail : how endless choice is creating unlimited demand
(2017)
The Rise of the Weaponized AI Propaganda Machine‖, Scout: Science Fiction + Journalism, 12 February, available
Far-Right Bots Are The Secret Of Marine Le Pen's Social Media Boom‖
(2017)
Public libraries in the age of fake news‖, Public Libraries Online
Who shared it? How Americans decide what news to trust on social media‖
Chengcheng Shao, G. Ciampaglia, A. Flammini, F. Menczer (2016)
Hoaxy: A Platform for Tracking Online MisinformationProceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web
(2017)
Fake news– how the library can help
(2011)
The backfire effect‖, You Are Not So Smart, 10 June, available
(2017)
Why facts don‘t change our minds‖, The New Yorker, 27 February, available at: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/27/why-facts-dontchange-our-minds (accessed 3 March 2017)
(2017)
Facebook‘s news literacy advice is harmful to news literacy
(2017)
Assessing Russian activities and intentions in recent elections
Trump officials suspend plan to delete EPA climate web pages‖
Facebook to support the News Literacy Project on public service ad campaign‖, The News Literacy Project
F. Steele (1996)
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the DarkNature Medicine, 2
(2017)
̳Post-truth‘ named 2016 word of the year by Oxford Dictionaries‖, Washington Post, 16 November, available
Jennifer Jerit (2012)
Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information EnvironmentThe Journal of Politics, 74
Jeffrey Gottfried, E. Shearer (2016)
News use across social media platforms 2016
(2017)
$2 billion worth of free media for Donald Trump
H. Mendelsohn, B. Hodge, D. Tripp, N. Postman (1987)
"Mix a Little Folly with Your Wisdom"--Horace@@@Children and Television.@@@Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business.Contemporary Sociology, 16
(2017)
In a swirl of ̳ untruths ‘ and ̳ falsehoods , ‘ calling a lie a lie ‖
Andrew Perrin (2015)
Social Media Usage: 2005-2015
Lee Rainie, J. Anderson, Jonathan Albright (2017)
The future of free speech, trolls, anonymity and fake news online
(2017)
Diehard Coders Just Rescued NASA‘s Earth Science Data
R. Tarnas (1991)
The passion of the Western mind : understanding the ideas that have shaped our world view
This article won't change your mind‖, The Atlantic
‗Alternative facts' are just lies‖, The Guardian
(2016)
Fighting Fake News‖, American Libraries Magazine, 27 December, available
(2017)
A taxonomy of dishomesty
Lucas Graves (2016)
Deciding What's True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism
Why people troll, according to science‖
B. Nyhan, Jason Reifler (2019)
The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptionsJournal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29
(2016)
Why we‘re funny about facts and prefer emotions
(2011)
The history of smartphones‖, The Next Web, 6 December, available
The Next Web
Rachel Wexelbaum (2016)
The Library as Safe Space, 36
(2017)
Three perspectives on ̳fake news‘‖, Platypus: The CASTAC Blog, 9 May, available
(2016)
The collapse of meaning in a post-truth world
(2017)
An ̳alternative facts‘ South Dakota bill sparks fears for science education in the Trump era
(2017)
Activists rush to save government science data — if they can find it‖, The New York Times, 6 March, available
(2017)
Creative ways to fight fake news ‖
J. Stone (2004)
Expecting Armageddon : Essential Readings in Failed ProphecyNova Religio-journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 8
(2016)
The 2016 presidential campaign – a news event that ‘ s hard to miss ‖
D. Barclay (2017)
The Challenge Facing Libraries in an Era of Fake NewsThe conversation
Graham Cormode, B. Krishnamurthy (2008)
Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0First Monday, 13
Thomas Wood, Ethan Porter (2019)
The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual AdherencePolitical Behavior, 41
(2016)
Fact-checking can change views? We rate that as mostly true‖, The New York Times, 5 November, available
This is how your hyperpartisan political news gets made‖
Lucas Graves, Federica Cherubini (2016)
The rise of fact-checking sites in Europe
C. Sagan (1995)
The demon-haunted world. Science as a candle in the dark
(2007)
Cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger)‖, in Ritzer, G. (Ed.), Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, available at:https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9781405124331.2007.x
PurposeTo serve their clients in a time of post-truth discourse and fake news, librarians need to understand the post-truth phenomenon. The purpose of this paper is to examine it, what is being done in response to it, and specifically what libraries can do.Design/methodology/approachRecent literature on the post-truth phenomenon was examined. Traditional assumptions about the role of libraries in promoting democracy were questioned and an alternative view was put forward. Libraries’ responses to the post-truth phenomenon were examined and critically discussed.FindingsTraditional assumptions about the role of libraries and information and democracy are outdated. The susceptibility of people to false beliefs and the persistence of these beliefs in spite of corrective information, is the product of many factors, including the evolving media ecosystem and psychosocial processes which are the subject of ongoing empirical research. It not primarily an information or knowledge deficit, hence there are no simple antidotes to fake news. Libraries need to rethink their responses.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper deals with very recent developments and relies heavily on informal online resources.Practical implicationsRelevant library activities are examined and suggestions are made for developing appropriate library responses.Originality/valueAt the time of writing this was the first attempt in the library management literature to engage in a systematic and thoughtful manner with the literature on the post-truth phenomenon.
Library Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 11, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.