Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Decision making in advance of a supply chain crisis

Decision making in advance of a supply chain crisis Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a qualitative method to examine why complex supply chain crises occur, to aid in future development of a model and theory of supply chain crisis management. The lack of analysis of crisis events in supply chains and their underlying causes is to be addressed.Designmethodologyapproach The paper analyzes various types of supply chain crises and using qualitative analysis determines what key investments of time and resources would prevent crises from escalating or recurring,.Findings The qualitative analysis reveals key characteristics in supply chain crises. The most common is dependence on a sole supplier, while poor relationships with suppliers are also contributory, as was risk management. Several common characteristics of successful management were found, most notably capacity flexibility, but also multiple suppliers and proactive risk management.Research limitationsimplications The nature of the study is exploratory, and future research could refine the work to determine a model and theory of supply chain crisis success and failures.Practical implications Maintaining capacity flexibility during noncrisis times can be a difficult investment to make. To pay overhead and maintenance costs on underutilized equipment and a facility with no intention of using those resources for normal production appears at the outset to be counterintuitive. However, given the potential risk of a crisis, a decision to allow for diverse capacity, backup equipment, or alternative manufacturing locations results in a positive return on investment in a crisis.Originalityvalue The first steps toward a model for decision making during a supply chain crisis in a firm have been taken. This paper examines supply chain crises by analyzing crises and their outcomes, a method not used in previous papers. Crises management needs proactive analysis, and this paper is an initial exploration of ways to undertake the evaluation of key investments, using both qualitative and quantitative methods. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Management Decision Emerald Publishing

Decision making in advance of a supply chain crisis

Hittle, Brad; Moustafa Leonard, Karen
Management Decision , Volume 49 (7): 12 – Aug 2, 2011
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/decision-making-in-advance-of-a-supply-chain-crisis-4Y0hpucTKu

References (26)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0025-1747
DOI
10.1108/00251741111151208
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a qualitative method to examine why complex supply chain crises occur, to aid in future development of a model and theory of supply chain crisis management. The lack of analysis of crisis events in supply chains and their underlying causes is to be addressed.Designmethodologyapproach The paper analyzes various types of supply chain crises and using qualitative analysis determines what key investments of time and resources would prevent crises from escalating or recurring,.Findings The qualitative analysis reveals key characteristics in supply chain crises. The most common is dependence on a sole supplier, while poor relationships with suppliers are also contributory, as was risk management. Several common characteristics of successful management were found, most notably capacity flexibility, but also multiple suppliers and proactive risk management.Research limitationsimplications The nature of the study is exploratory, and future research could refine the work to determine a model and theory of supply chain crisis success and failures.Practical implications Maintaining capacity flexibility during noncrisis times can be a difficult investment to make. To pay overhead and maintenance costs on underutilized equipment and a facility with no intention of using those resources for normal production appears at the outset to be counterintuitive. However, given the potential risk of a crisis, a decision to allow for diverse capacity, backup equipment, or alternative manufacturing locations results in a positive return on investment in a crisis.Originalityvalue The first steps toward a model for decision making during a supply chain crisis in a firm have been taken. This paper examines supply chain crises by analyzing crises and their outcomes, a method not used in previous papers. Crises management needs proactive analysis, and this paper is an initial exploration of ways to undertake the evaluation of key investments, using both qualitative and quantitative methods.

Journal

Management Decision – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 2, 2011

Keywords: Decision making; Supply chain management

There are no references for this article.