Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. McCann, M. Buckner (2004)
Strategically integrating knowledge management initiativesJ. Knowl. Manag., 8
Helen Salavou (2005)
Do Customer and Technology Orientations Influence Product Innovativeness in SMEs? Some New Evidence from GreeceJournal of Marketing Management, 21
C. Winkelen, W. Jordan (2008)
Building the capability to be innovative
Minna Rollins, Aino Halinen (2005)
Customer Knowledge Management Competence: Towards a Theoretical FrameworkProceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
S. Zahra, G. George (2002)
Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and ExtensionAcademy of Management Review, 27
Hanna Salojärvi, Liisa-Maija Sainio (2006)
Applying Absorptive Capacity Construct to Customer-related Knowledge Processing
E. Revilla
Proceedings of Olkc 2007 – " Learning Fusion " Antecedents and Consequences of Knowledge Integration in Product Development. an Empirical Evidence
I. Alam (2002)
An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service developmentJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30
Matti Kaulio (1998)
Customer, consumer and user involvement in product development: A framework and a review of selected methodsTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence, 9
Gilbert Churchill (1979)
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing ConstructsJournal of Marketing Research, 16
R. Lusch, S. Vargo, Matthew O'Brien (2007)
Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logicJournal of Retailing, 83
Toni Hilton, T. Hughes (2008)
Co-production and co-creation using self-service technology: the application of service-dominant logic
David Hoopes, Steven Postrel (1999)
Shared knowledge, “glitches,” and product development performanceStrategic Management Journal, 20
J. Phills, Kriss Deiglmeier, Dale Miller (2008)
Rediscovering Social Innovation
P. Jordan (1998)
Human factors for pleasure in product use.Applied ergonomics, 29 1
D. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen (1997)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTStrategic Management Journal, 18
Wesley Cohen, Daniel Levinthal (1990)
ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATIONAdministrative Science Quarterly, 35
Christopher Lettl, C. Herstatt (2004)
Users as inventors and developers of radical innovation : An explorative case study analysis in the field of medical technology
M. Zack (1999)
Managing Codified KnowledgeSloan Management Review, 40
Elaine Welsh (2002)
Dealing with Data: Using NVivo in the Qualitative Data Analysis Process, 3
M. Lin, Chih-Jou Chen (2008)
Integration and knowledge sharing: transforming to long‐term competitive advantageInternational Journal of Organizational Analysis, 16
Anthony Ulwick, Lance Bettencourt (2008)
Giving Customers a Fair HearingMIT Sloan Management Review, 49
Penelope Jones, J. Jordan (1998)
Knowledge orientations and team effectivenessInternational Journal of Technology Management, 16
Jianwen Liao, Jill Kickul, Haofei Ma (2009)
Organizational Dynamic Capability and Innovation: An Empirical Examination of Internet FirmsJournal of Small Business Management, 47
J. Barney (1991)
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive AdvantageJournal of Management, 17
Eric Hippel (1986)
Lead users: a source of novel product conceptsManagement Science, 32
M. Gibbert, M. Leibold, G. Probst (2002)
Five Styles of Customer Knowledge Management, and How Smart Companies Use Them To Create ValueEuropean Management Journal, 20
R. Grant (1991)
The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy FormulationCalifornia Management Review, 33
Tehmina Basit (2003)
Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysisEducational Research, 45
T. Li, R. Calantone (1998)
The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical ExaminationJournal of Marketing, 62
Moustafa Battor, M. Zairi, A. Francis (2008)
Knowledge‐based capabilities and their impact on performance: a best practice management evaluationBusiness Strategy Series, 9
Jérôme Billé, R. Soparnot (2006)
Customer knowledge: a resource for innovation? The PSA case study
Denise Jarratt (2008)
Testing a theoretically constructed relationship management capabilityEuropean Journal of Marketing, 42
Catherine Wang, P. Ahmed (2007)
Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research AgendaIO: Theory
D. Teece, G. Pisano (1994)
The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an IntroductionIndustrial and Corporate Change, 3
S. Ramaswami, R. Srivastava, M. Bhargava (2009)
Market-based capabilities and financial performance of firms: insights into marketing’s contribution to firm valueJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37
T. Street (2004)
Information Technology Infrastructure Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis
O. Gassmann, Ellen Enkel (2004)
Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes
O. Gassmann, Patricia Sandmeier, Christoph Wecht (2006)
Extreme customer innovation in the front-end: learning from a new software paradigmInt. J. Technol. Manag., 33
M. Zollo, S. Winter (2002)
Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic CapabilitiesOrganization Science, 13
Michael Tippins, R. Sohi (2003)
IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link?Strategic Management Journal, 24
Thorsten Roser, A. Samson, P. Humphreys, Eidi Cruz-Valdivieso (2009)
New pathways to value: co-creating products by collaborating with customers
Purpose – The present paper aims to propose a measurement scale of the customer knowledge enabled innovation (CKEI) capability. Design/methodology/approach – Data were generated on the basis of in‐depth interviews with managers and was analysed using the “Sphinx” software. Findings – A pool of 60 items is proposed for the eventual measurement of the CKEI capability. Research limitations/implications – The proposed measurement scale is still raw. Further research is needed in order to test its psychometric features as well as to validate its relevance into a general model of customer knowledge management and innovation. Practical implications – Organizations need to measure the degree to which they are endowed with the capability of managing effectively customer knowledge in order to foster innovation. The CKEI scale is considered as a barometer allowing organizations to evaluate to what extent they are endowed with the capacity of co‐creating value with their customers. The proposed CKEI scale is believed to provide managers with the opportunity to regularly monitor their innovative capability and be close to their customers. Originality/value – The CKEI capability is proposed as a new construct focusing on integrating both innovation and knowledge‐based capabilities literatures. The CKEI measurement scale is believed to extend these literatures and to add knowledge to these areas of research..
Journal of Knowledge Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 19, 2011
Keywords: Knowledge‐based capabilities; Customer service management; Knowledge management; Innovation; Measurement scale
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.