Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Cross‐country determinants of satisfaction with life

Cross‐country determinants of satisfaction with life Purpose – This paper aims to investigate the social, economic, and cultural factors that impact satisfaction with life (SWL) in 63 countries. The intent is to determine empirically the extent to which self‐reported SWL truly reflects well‐being. Design/methodology/approach – A cross‐sectional data set of 63 countries in the 1990s is used to develop a model that explains SWL using social, economic, and cultural variables. The regression errors indicate that some countries are inexplicably happy or unhappy. If behavioral variables in these countries, such as suicide and fertility rates, are better explained by the model's fitted values than actual SWL, then cross country comparisons of subjective SWL surveys are invalid. Findings – Social and economic factors explain about 66 percent of the variation in self‐reported happiness across countries. Respondents in former socialist‐bloc countries report surprisingly low levels of SWL given their circumstances while Latin Americans report higher‐than‐expected levels of happiness. These two geographic anomalies are attributed to cultural factors and dummy variables for each region are highly significant. People living in these two geographic regions are shown to behave in accordance with their reported levels of happiness, more so than their predicted levels, with regard to suicide and fertility rates. Even mean blood pressure in these countries is better predicted with reported levels of satisfaction than predicted levels. All this supports the notion that surveys of SWL are good measures of well‐being. Research limitations/implications – The results are obtained using cross‐country macro‐level data. The degree of aggregation, sample size, and presence of multicollinearity may hinder the identification of appropriate predictors of well‐being. On the other hand, these results corroborate those from larger, pooled, and individual‐level data sets. Originality/value – The findings support the view that aggregated surveys of life satisfaction contain important information concerning the well‐being of citizens in a given country. Survey data can compete with other macroeconomic and sociological data to monitor progress and explain behavior at the national level. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Social Economics Emerald Publishing

Cross‐country determinants of satisfaction with life

International Journal of Social Economics , Volume 35 (6): 17 – May 9, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/cross-country-determinants-of-satisfaction-with-life-Yi49g8kS51

References (38)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0306-8293
DOI
10.1108/03068290810873384
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to investigate the social, economic, and cultural factors that impact satisfaction with life (SWL) in 63 countries. The intent is to determine empirically the extent to which self‐reported SWL truly reflects well‐being. Design/methodology/approach – A cross‐sectional data set of 63 countries in the 1990s is used to develop a model that explains SWL using social, economic, and cultural variables. The regression errors indicate that some countries are inexplicably happy or unhappy. If behavioral variables in these countries, such as suicide and fertility rates, are better explained by the model's fitted values than actual SWL, then cross country comparisons of subjective SWL surveys are invalid. Findings – Social and economic factors explain about 66 percent of the variation in self‐reported happiness across countries. Respondents in former socialist‐bloc countries report surprisingly low levels of SWL given their circumstances while Latin Americans report higher‐than‐expected levels of happiness. These two geographic anomalies are attributed to cultural factors and dummy variables for each region are highly significant. People living in these two geographic regions are shown to behave in accordance with their reported levels of happiness, more so than their predicted levels, with regard to suicide and fertility rates. Even mean blood pressure in these countries is better predicted with reported levels of satisfaction than predicted levels. All this supports the notion that surveys of SWL are good measures of well‐being. Research limitations/implications – The results are obtained using cross‐country macro‐level data. The degree of aggregation, sample size, and presence of multicollinearity may hinder the identification of appropriate predictors of well‐being. On the other hand, these results corroborate those from larger, pooled, and individual‐level data sets. Originality/value – The findings support the view that aggregated surveys of life satisfaction contain important information concerning the well‐being of citizens in a given country. Survey data can compete with other macroeconomic and sociological data to monitor progress and explain behavior at the national level.

Journal

International Journal of Social EconomicsEmerald Publishing

Published: May 9, 2008

Keywords: Quality of life; Lifestyles; Income; Suicide; South America

There are no references for this article.