Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Yin (1993)
Applications of case study research
T. Pyzdek (2014)
The Six Sigma handbook : a complete guide for green belts, black belts, and managers at all levels
S. Winter (2000)
The satisficing principle in capability learningStrategic Management Journal, 21
V. Rindova, S. Kotha (2001)
Continuous “Morphing”: Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and FunctionAcademy of Management Journal, 44
K. Eisenhardt, Jeffrey Martin (2000)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY?Strategic Management Journal, 21
M. Easterby-Smith, R. Thorpe, A. Lowe (1991)
Management Research: An Introduction
R. Grant (2005)
Contemporary Strategy Analysis
Donald Coffin (1993)
Using "The Competitive Edge.".Journal of Economic Education, 24
Richard Makadok (2001)
Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creationSouthern Medical Journal, 22
M. Saunders, P. Lewis, A. Thornhill (2006)
Research Methods for Business Students
B. Wernerfelt (1984)
A Resource-Based View of the FirmSouthern Medical Journal, 5
J. Antony (2004)
Some pros and cons of six sigma: an academic perspectiveThe Tqm Magazine, 16
Edward Arnheiter, J. Maleyeff (2005)
The integration of lean management and Six SigmaThe Tqm Magazine, 17
M. George (2002)
Lean Six Sigma : combining Six Sigma quality with lean speed
Richard D'Aveni, R. Gunther (1995)
Hypercompetitive Rivalries: Competing in Highly Dynamic Environments
R. Coronado, J. Antony (2002)
Critical success factors for the successful implementation of six sigma projects in organisationsThe Tqm Magazine, 14
I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi (1995)
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How
N. Slack, Stuart Chambers, R. Johnston (1994)
Operations management
D. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen (1997)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTStrategic Management Journal, 18
G. Stalk, P. Evans, L. Shulman (1992)
Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy.Harvard business review, 70 2
C. Argyris (1976)
Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making.Administrative Science Quarterly, 21
G. Johnson (1990)
Managing Strategic Change; The Role of Symbolic ActionBritish Journal of Management, 1
G. Johnson, Kevan Scholes, R. Whittington (1988)
Exploring Corporate Strategy
Subrata Biswas (2004)
The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value with Customers, 12
J. Antony (2004)
Six Sigma in the UK service organisations: results from a pilot surveyManagerial Auditing Journal, 19
J. Meredith (1998)
Building operations management theory through case and field researchJournal of Operations Management, 16
J. Bicheno (2002)
The quality 75: towards six sigma performance in service and manufacturing
R. Yin (1984)
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Rita McGrath, I. MacMillan, S. Venkataraman (1995)
Defining and developing competence: A strategic process paradigmSouthern Medical Journal, 16
C. Medlin (2007)
Case Study Research
Gary Hamel, C. Prahalad (1994)
Competing for the Future
N. Senapati (2004)
Six Sigma: myths and realitiesInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21
G. Johnson, Kevan Scholes, R. Whittington (1989)
Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases
C. Robson (1993)
Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers
Kim Henderson, James Evans (2000)
Successful implementation of Six Sigma: benchmarking General Electric CompanyBenchmarking: An International Journal, 7
(1980)
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
Forrest Breyfogle (1999)
Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods
J. McCann (1980)
Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism
J. Antony, R. Coronado (2002)
Design for Six SigmaManufacturing Engineer, 81
R. Grant (1991)
Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications
Purpose – Many organisations are operating in a dynamic competitive environment and experiencing increasing competition. As a result organisations in the service sector are continually seeking opportunities to remove waste and improve performance. Six sigma has been embraced by the service sector and is receiving increasing attention within both academe and practice. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate lean six sigma from a middle managers' perspective. Design/methodology/approach – A mixed method approach was adopted involving a structured survey to 200 managers and semi‐structured interviews with two of the management team. Findings – The paper highlights the importance of developing learning capabilities in the middle management team and the empowering of them. A greater role should be given to middle management in performance improvement and strategy formulation. Research limitations/implications – The research findings only apply to one case so it is difficult to make assumptions across different sectors. More research is required with regard to change management in lean six sigma implementations. Originality/value – This paper shows that developing dynamic capabilities in middle management along with a learning culture will facilitate participation in strategy formulation.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 6, 2012
Keywords: Six Sigma; Lean production; Middle management; Lean Six Sigma; Corporate strategy; Critical success factors; Learning; Performance improvement; Dynamic capabilities
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.