Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Criteria for achieving efficient contractor‐supplier relations

Criteria for achieving efficient contractor‐supplier relations Purpose – Despite numerous examples of benefits when adapting supplier relationship management in the manufacturing industry, the construction industry still lags behind in such areas as long‐term relationships with suppliers and continuous cost‐reductions. This may be because the characteristics of the construction industry differ from those of the manufacturing industry due to their project‐based structure, its inherent tendency for sub‐optimization and the vast number and variety of suppliers. The purpose of this study is to identify criteria for achieving efficient contractor‐supplier relations in the construction industry and for large contractors. Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws on the literature on efficiency and differentiation of efficient buyer‐supplier relationships as well as a two‐year case study based on participatory observations and interviews with strategic purchasers at a large Swedish contractor. Findings – As it is not always possible to increase efficiency in the interface‐related value‐creating processes by only aiming the development and improvement efforts directly at these processes, relationship enablers such as total cost focus, aligned core values as well as willingness and capability for collaboration and development must first be in place. In order to achieve this, the contractor has to adopt a long‐term orientation towards the relationship with the suppliers, which is a decision for the management to make. Practical implications – Drawing from the findings, this paper elucidates the connection between increased efficiency and input variables in the contractor‐supplier relationship, which might be difficult for contractors to see. Furthermore, contractors need to take responsibility over their own processes in order to be an attractive customer to the supplier. Originality/value – Even though research within construction has focused on relations between different actors, mostly client and contractor, this paper widens the perspective and takes a grasp of the relationship between contractor and supplier. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management Emerald Publishing

Criteria for achieving efficient contractor‐supplier relations

Download PDF
13 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/criteria-for-achieving-efficient-contractor-supplier-relations-8gJDliP6m8

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0969-9988
DOI
10.1108/09699981111145826
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – Despite numerous examples of benefits when adapting supplier relationship management in the manufacturing industry, the construction industry still lags behind in such areas as long‐term relationships with suppliers and continuous cost‐reductions. This may be because the characteristics of the construction industry differ from those of the manufacturing industry due to their project‐based structure, its inherent tendency for sub‐optimization and the vast number and variety of suppliers. The purpose of this study is to identify criteria for achieving efficient contractor‐supplier relations in the construction industry and for large contractors. Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws on the literature on efficiency and differentiation of efficient buyer‐supplier relationships as well as a two‐year case study based on participatory observations and interviews with strategic purchasers at a large Swedish contractor. Findings – As it is not always possible to increase efficiency in the interface‐related value‐creating processes by only aiming the development and improvement efforts directly at these processes, relationship enablers such as total cost focus, aligned core values as well as willingness and capability for collaboration and development must first be in place. In order to achieve this, the contractor has to adopt a long‐term orientation towards the relationship with the suppliers, which is a decision for the management to make. Practical implications – Drawing from the findings, this paper elucidates the connection between increased efficiency and input variables in the contractor‐supplier relationship, which might be difficult for contractors to see. Furthermore, contractors need to take responsibility over their own processes in order to be an attractive customer to the supplier. Originality/value – Even though research within construction has focused on relations between different actors, mostly client and contractor, this paper widens the perspective and takes a grasp of the relationship between contractor and supplier.

Journal

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 5, 2011

Keywords: Supplier relationship management; Buyer‐supplier relationships; Construction industry; Long‐term orientation; Sweden

References

  • Collaborative relationships in construction: the UK contractors' perception
    Akintoye, A.; Main, J.
  • Business Research Methods
    Bryman, A.; Bell, E.
  • Skärpning gubbar! Om konkurrensen, kvaliteten, kostnaderna och kompetensen i byggsektorn
    Byggkommissionen
  • Strategically managed buyer‐supplier relationships and performance outcomes
    Carr, A.S.; Pearson, J.N.
  • Strategic supplier segmentation: ‘the next best practice’ in supply chain management
    Dyer, J.H.; Cho, D.S.; Chu, W.
  • The concept of attraction – its purchasing potential
    Ellegaard, C.; Ritter, T.
  • Buyer‐supplier collaborative relationships: beyond the normative accounts
    Emberson, C.; Storey, J.
  • A process for developing partnerships with subcontractors in the construction industry: an empirical study
    Errasti, A.; Beach, R.; Oyarbide, A.; Santos, J.
  • Exploring change in construction: supply chain management
    Fernie, S.; Thorpe, A.
  • Initiating supplier development through value stream analysis: the case of Skanska Sweden and its largest supplier
    Frödell, M.; Josephson, P.‐E.
  • Project complexity: the focal point of construction production planning
    Gidado, K.I.
  • Interactional perspective on environmental communication in construction projects
    Gluch, P.; Räisänen, C.
  • Roles in sociological field observations
    Gold, R.
  • International comparisons of supply‐chain relationships
    Harland, C.
  • The influence of purchasing strategies on performance
    Janda, S.; Seshadri, S.
  • Purchasing must become supply management
    Kraljic, P.
  • The antecedents of buying firms' efforts to improve suppliers
    Krause, D.R.
  • What only the CEO can do
    Lafley, A.G.
  • Affect‐ and cognition‐based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations
    McAllister, D.J.
  • Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation
    Merriam, S.
  • Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective
    Monczka, R.M.; Petersen, K.J.; Handfield, R.B.; Ragatz, G.L.
  • Issues in supplier partner selection
    Pidduck, A.B.
  • Purchasing myopia revisited again?
    Rozemeijer, F.
  • Factors of determining long‐term orientation in interfirm relationships
    Ryu, S.; Park, J.E.; Min, S.
  • A review of the progress towards the adoption of supply chain management (SCM) relationships in construction
    Saad, M.; Jones, M.; James, P.
  • An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships
    Spekman, R.E.; Kamauff, J.W.; Myhr, N.
  • Sega gubbar? En uppföljning av Byggkommissionens betänkande, Skärpning gubbar
    Statskontoret
  • Demystifying productivity and performance
    Tangen, S.
  • Managing supplier integration into product development: a literature review and conceptual model
    van Echtelt, F.; Wynstra, F.
  • Purchasing & Supply Chain Management: Analysis, Strategy, Planning and Practice
    van Weele, A.
  • Driving and enabling factors for purchasing involvement in product development
    Wynstra, F.; Axelsson, B.; Weele, A.V.
  • Case Study Research: Design and Methods
    Yin, R.K.