Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Treloar, K. Morley, Sandra Taylor, W. Hall (2007)
Why Do They Do It?Public Health Genomics, 10
Laura Hansen (2009)
Corporate financial crime: social diagnosis and treatmentJournal of Financial Crime, 16
Robert Smith (2009)
Understanding entrepreneurial behaviour in organized criminalsJournal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in The Global Economy, 3
A. Godley, M. Casson (2007)
Revisiting the Emergence of the Modern Business Enterprise: Entrepreneurship and the Singer Global Distribution SystemERPN: Occupational Choice (Sub-Topic)
Z. Bookman
Convergences and omissions in reporting corporate and white collar crime
Kevonne Small, Bruce Taylor (2006)
State and local law enforcement response to transnational crimeTrends in Organized Crime, 10
E. Sutherland (1940)
White-collar criminality.American Sociological Review, 5
Pamela Bucy, Elizabeth Formby, Marc Raspanti, Kathryn Rooney (2012)
Why Do They Do It?: The Motives, Mores, and Character of White Collar CriminalsSt. John’s Law Review, 82
M.L. Benson, S.S. Simpson
White‐collar Crime: An Opportunity Perspective, Criminology and Justice Series
D. Zaitch (2002)
Trafficking Cocaine: Colombian Drug Entrepreneurs in the Netherlands
Elisabeth Symeonidou-Kastanidou (2007)
Towards a New Definition of Organised Crime in the European UnionEuropean Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 15
M. Siponen, A. Vance
Neutralization: new insights into the problem of employee information systems security policy violations
Rob D'Ovidio, Tyson Mitman, Imaani El-Burki, Wesley Shumar (2009)
Adult-Child Sex Advocacy Websites as SocialLearning Environments: A Content AnalysisInternational Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3
(1998)
White-Collar Crimes
M. Siponen, Anthony Vance (2010)
Neutralization: New Insights into the Problem of Employee Systems Security Policy ViolationsMIS Q., 34
Nuno Garoupa (1999)
Optimal Law Enforcement and Criminal OrganizationStanford Law School
Robert Moore, E. McMullan (2009)
Neutralizations and Rationalizations of Digital Piracy: A Qualitative Analysis of University StudentsInternational Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3
R. Robson (2010)
Rehabilitating Retribution as a Justification for Organizational Criminal Liability
Joseph Heath (2008)
Business Ethics and Moral Motivation: A Criminological PerspectiveJournal of Business Ethics, 83
Mark Casson (2000)
An Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm
George Higgins, Scott Wolfe, Catherine Marcum (2008)
Music Piracy and Neutralization: A Preliminary Trajectory Analysis from Short-Term Longitudinal DataInternational Journal of Cyber Criminology, 2
D. Hobbs (1988)
Doing the Business: Entrepreneurship, the Working Class, and Detectives in the East End of London
(2009)
Understanding entrepreneurial behavior in organized criminals, Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy
R.A. Robson
Crime and punishment: rehabilitating retribution as a justification for organizational criminal liability
K. McKague (2011)
Dynamic capabilities of institutional entrepreneurshipJournal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in The Global Economy, 5
W. Baumol (1990)
Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and DestructiveJournal of Political Economy, 98
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to apply neutralization theory to white‐collar criminals to discuss criminal entrepreneurship. Design/methodology/approach – The theoretical framework of neutralization techniques is applied to criminal entrepreneurship and white‐collar criminality. Findings – A legal entrepreneur is a person who operates a new enterprise or venture and assumes some accountability for the inherent risk. Similarly, the criminal entrepreneur's task is to discover and exploit opportunities, defined most simply as situations in which there are a profit to be made in criminal activity. Research limitations/implications – Examples of criminal entrepreneurship committed by otherwise legal entrepreneurs are commonly labeled as white‐collar criminality. This paper discusses how criminal entrepreneurship by white‐collar criminals can be explained by neutralization theory, as white‐collar criminals tend to apply techniques of neutralization used by offenders to deny the criminality of their actions. Practical implications – Policing white‐collar criminality should be expanded to understand criminal entrepreneurs when applying neutralization theory to deny crime activities. Social implications – Neutralization theory illustrates how serious white‐collar crime is denied by the offender. Originality/value – As can be seen by this brief discussion of criminal entrepreneurship, white‐collar criminality and corporate and organized crime, there is a need for a concentrated research effort to clarify and explain these conflated conflicts. By discussing them in context this paper has made a contribution to the literature by introducing the concepts of entrepreneurial leadership and entrepreneurial judgment into the debate. Moreover, in discussing neutralization theory, some fresh insights can be gained into the mind of the criminal entrepreneur.
Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 18, 2011
Keywords: Crime; Criminals; Entrepreneurialism; Entrepreneurs; Criminal entrepreneur; White‐collar crime; Neutralization theory
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.