Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
AICPA
Bankcruptcy Prediction Models and Going Concern Audit Opinions Before and After SAS
G. Vinten (2002)
The corporate governance lessons of EnronCorporate Governance, 2
D. Woodliff, G. Monroe (1994)
The Audit Expection Gap: Messages Communicated Through the Unqualified Audit Report
I. Wilson (2000)
The new rulesStrategy & Leadership, 28
APB
The company applies APB Opinion No. … that no warranty reserve was necessary as of December 31, 1995 and 1996
J.L. Dyer
Toward the development of objective materiality norms
W.P. Jenkins
The goal of price stability
AICPA
Serving the public interest: a new conceptual framework for auditor independence
Brenda Porter (1993)
An Empirical Study of the Audit Expectation-Performance GapAccounting and Business Research, 24
Colin Ferguson, G. Richardson, G. Wines (2000)
Audit Education and Training: The Effect of Formal Studies and Work ExperienceAccounting Horizons, 14
AICPA
Auditing Procedures Study, Audit Sampling
M. WoolseyS (1973)
Approach to solving the materiality problem., 135
D.R. Carmichael, S.G. Pany
The appearance standard for auditor independence: what we know and should know
Peter Schelluch, Wendy Green (1996)
The Expectation Gap: the Next StepAustralian Accounting Review, 6
R. Mautz, H. Sharaf
The Philosophy of Auditing
D. Laing, C. Weir (1999)
Governance structures, size and corporate performance in UK firmsManagement Decision, 37
C. Humphrey, Peter Moizer, S. Turley (1992)
The audit expectations gap—plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose?Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 3
Y.J. Marian, M.C. Gladie, Y.H. Albert
Malayan Law Journal
IASC
Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements
G. Vinten (2001)
Corporate Governance and the Sons of CadburyCorporate Governance, 1
AASB
An Experimental Investigation of Alternative Going Concern Reporting Formats: Canadian Experience
M.H. Fisher
The effects of reporting auditor materiality levels publicly, privately, or not at all in an experimental markets setting
J.E. McEnroe, S.C. Martens
Taxman
This paper analyzes and reports on studies that examine the extent to which international auditing boards have accomplished the goal of reducing the expectation gap in reporting on uncertainties. This is because there has been a long-running controversy between the auditing profession and the community of financial statement users concerning the responsibilities of the auditors to the users. Enron and WorldCom scandals have provoked the public to incite the government and professional bodies to impose stringent regulation in protecting their interests. It also suggests the solutions to minimize the gap and enhance the public's perception towards the profession.
Managerial Auditing Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 1, 2003
Keywords: Reports; Financial reporting
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.