Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Costs and benefits of private tutoring programs: the South Korean case

Costs and benefits of private tutoring programs: the South Korean case The purpose of the study is twofold: to offer a theoretical model that illuminates families' motivation to invest in private tutoring and to consider the implications of such investments in the context of South Korea. Given that parents invest in private tutoring for their child if the perceived expected benefits, at the time of enrollment, are greater than the direct and indirect costs of such tutoring, the study explores how private tutoring may affect educational inequities and possibly lead to inferior social outcomes.Design/methodology/approachA theoretical model based on the human capital approach was developed. Three questions based on stylized facts were addressed: (1) Why would a household send a child to private tutoring? (2) Why do different households invest in different amounts of private tutoring? (3) Why may a household over-invest in private tutoring?FindingsThe findings of this study indicate that the demand for private tutoring services decreases with the costs of private tutoring, while increasing as levels of academic readiness and aptitude, levels of household education, levels of current wealth and expected returns to private tutoring increase. These findings imply that private tutoring may exacerbate social inequities and cause an inferior social outcome, but that a government can influence the demand for tutoring through taxation.Research limitations/implicationsThis study did not address the non-pecuniary benefits that may be derived from private tutoring. The most important limitation and potential source of weakness of the study is that the model is theoretical. These results therefore need to be interpreted with caution.Practical implicationsThe study indicates the need for private households, as well as government officials, to carefully consider the costs and benefits of private tutoring in South Korea. Although the study focuses on South Korea, the findings may apply to other countries in which private tutoring offerings are prominent.Social implicationsThe educational choices that families make for their children have important financial and social implications in all countries, but especially in South Korea. The important implication is that private tutoring will tend to aggravate educational and social inequality.Originality/valueThe existing body of research on private tutoring investment in South Korea suggests that the phenomenon is ubiquitous, growing and spreading to other countries. Furthermore, the motivation behind households' decisions to invest in private tutoring for their children is not always addressed in the published literature. Also, far too little attention has been paid to the economic impact private tutoring has on households and children, as well as society in general. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Social Economics Emerald Publishing

Costs and benefits of private tutoring programs: the South Korean case

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/costs-and-benefits-of-private-tutoring-programs-the-south-korean-case-ZJgW4pyU5A
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0306-8293
DOI
10.1108/ijse-12-2019-0722
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of the study is twofold: to offer a theoretical model that illuminates families' motivation to invest in private tutoring and to consider the implications of such investments in the context of South Korea. Given that parents invest in private tutoring for their child if the perceived expected benefits, at the time of enrollment, are greater than the direct and indirect costs of such tutoring, the study explores how private tutoring may affect educational inequities and possibly lead to inferior social outcomes.Design/methodology/approachA theoretical model based on the human capital approach was developed. Three questions based on stylized facts were addressed: (1) Why would a household send a child to private tutoring? (2) Why do different households invest in different amounts of private tutoring? (3) Why may a household over-invest in private tutoring?FindingsThe findings of this study indicate that the demand for private tutoring services decreases with the costs of private tutoring, while increasing as levels of academic readiness and aptitude, levels of household education, levels of current wealth and expected returns to private tutoring increase. These findings imply that private tutoring may exacerbate social inequities and cause an inferior social outcome, but that a government can influence the demand for tutoring through taxation.Research limitations/implicationsThis study did not address the non-pecuniary benefits that may be derived from private tutoring. The most important limitation and potential source of weakness of the study is that the model is theoretical. These results therefore need to be interpreted with caution.Practical implicationsThe study indicates the need for private households, as well as government officials, to carefully consider the costs and benefits of private tutoring in South Korea. Although the study focuses on South Korea, the findings may apply to other countries in which private tutoring offerings are prominent.Social implicationsThe educational choices that families make for their children have important financial and social implications in all countries, but especially in South Korea. The important implication is that private tutoring will tend to aggravate educational and social inequality.Originality/valueThe existing body of research on private tutoring investment in South Korea suggests that the phenomenon is ubiquitous, growing and spreading to other countries. Furthermore, the motivation behind households' decisions to invest in private tutoring for their children is not always addressed in the published literature. Also, far too little attention has been paid to the economic impact private tutoring has on households and children, as well as society in general.

Journal

International Journal of Social Economics – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 31, 2021

Keywords: South Korea; Human capital; Educational expenditures; Private tutoring; Economic model; A21; C12; C30; D14; D50; D81; I20; I26

References

  • Family socioeconomic status and academic achievement among Korean adolescents:linking mechanisms of family processes and adolescents' time use
    Bae, D.; Wickrama, K.A.S.
  • Private supplementary tutoring: comparative perspectives on patterns and implications
    Bray, M.
  • The effect of after-school classes on private tuition, mental health and academic outcomes: evidence from Korea
    Carr, D.; Wang, L.C.
  • Analysis of private tutoring decisions in Korea: a game theory approach
    Choi, Á.
  • Regulating private tutoring consumption in Korea: lessons from another failure
    Choi, H.; Choi, A.
  • Sources of family income and expenditure on children’s private, after‐school education in Korea
    Chung, Y.S.; Choe, M.K.
  • Le public du soutien scolaire privé: cours particuliers et façonnement familial de la scolarité[*]
    Collas, T.
  • The growing phenomenon of private tutoring: does it deepen human capital, widen inequalities, or waste resources?
    Dang, H.A.; Rogers, F.H.
  • A new era of education: China education development report 2018
  • Private tutoring when stakes are high: insights from the transition from primary to secondary school in Germany
    Guill, K.; Lintorf, K.
  • Can after-school programs and private tutoring help improve students' achievement? Revisiting the effects in Korean secondary schools
    Ha, Y.; Park, H.-J.
  • Education policy in South Korea: a contemporary model of human capital accumulation?
    Hultberg, P.; Calonge, D.S.; Kim, S.-H.
  • Private tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it?
    Ireson, J.
  • Family size and educational investments in children: evidence from private tutoring expenditures in South Korea.(Report)
    Kang, C.
  • Education fever: Korean parents' aspirations for their children's schooling and future career
    Kim, J.-S.; Bang, H.
  • Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea
    Kim, S.; Lee, J.H.
  • The determinants of demand for private tutoring in South Korea
    Kim, J.-H.; Park, D.
  • Behavioral economics of education
    Koch, A.; Nafziger, J.; Nielsen, H.S.
  • The policies on supplemental education in Korea
    Lee, J.
  • The social effects of higher education policy in South Korea: the rise of the “pig mum” phenomenon
    Lee, E.; Calonge, D.S.; Hultberg, P.
  • Parental involvement and students' cognitive outcomes in Korea: focusing on private tutoring
    Park, H.; Byun, S.-Y.; Kim, K.-K.
  • Returns to investment in education: a decennial review of the global literature
    Psacharopoulos, G.; Patrinos, H.A.
  • Competitive and optimal responses to signals: an analysis of efficiency and distribution
    Spence, M.
  • Shadow education: a role of private tutoring in learning
    Subedi, K.R.