Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/cost-analysis-of-nutrition-support-in-patients-with-severe-acute-MIKIbg7iD0
References (29)
-
10.1177/011542650401900105
-
Jacob Cohen (1992)
QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY A Power Primer -
10.1016/j.clinup.2007.08.001
-
O. Ioannidis, A. Lavrentieva, D. Botsios (2008)
Nutrition support in acute pancreatitis.JOP : Journal of the pancreas, 9 4
-
A. Lugli, F. Carli, L. Wykes (2007)
The importance of nutrition status assessment: the case of severe acute pancreatitis.Nutrition reviews, 65 7
-
Srr Vieira, L. Fialkow, AK Fernandes, DR Silva, Ards group (2001)
Acute lung injury: a 1 year study at an intensive care unit of a university hospitalCritical Care, 5
-
M. Al-Omran, Zaina Albalawi, M. Tashkandi, L. Al-Ansary (2010)
Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 1
-
10.1177/011542650401900131
-
M. Alsolaiman, J. Green, J. Barkin
Hypocaloric jejunal feeding is better than total parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis results of a randominzed comparative study -
B. Forsmark
AGA institute medical position statement on acute pancreatitis -
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40587.x
-
10.1177/0148607106030002143
-
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08734.x
-
10.1177/0115426504019005518
-
C. Forsmark, J. Baillie (2007)
AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis.Gastroenterology, 132 5
-
10.1186/cc1188
-
10.1177/011542650401900116
-
M. Alsolaiman, Jesse Green, J. Barkin (2003)
Should enteral feeding be the standard of care for acute pancreatitis?: Abou-Assi S, Craig K, O'Keefe SJD, Hypocaloric jejunal feeding is better than total parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: results of a randomized comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:2255–62The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 98
-
10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
-
10.1177/0884533608326139
-
10.7326/0003-4819-132-9-200005020-00006
-
M. DeLegge
Endoscopic enteral access for enteral nutrition -
10.1016/j.crad.2007.11.005
-
10.1016/j.clnu.2005.03.003
-
10.1186/cc2190
-
10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.066
-
F. Eatock, P. Chong, N. Menezes
A randomized study of early nasogastric versus nasojejunal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis: results of a randomized comparative study -
10.4037/ccn2008.28.4.19
-
J. Cohen
A power primer
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 0952-6862
- DOI
- 10.1108/09526861111160571
- pmid
- 22204087
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this research was to assess the preferred route of nutrition support (enteral versus parenteral) for treatment of severe acute pancreatitis in the acute care setting. Further, in cases when enteral nutrition is the preferred route, is nasal‐bridling a lower‐morbidity and cost‐effective method? Design/methodology/approach – A retrospective review of pre‐existing data from an 870‐bed hospital system. Medical records were reviewed via an online database system ( n =25\; patients) with severe acute pancreatitis. Length of stay and cost were analyzed. Findings – More patients received TPN versus the nasal‐jejunal (post‐pyloric) tube feeds group. No significant relationship was found between total cost and number of co‐morbidities or between either of the two treatment groups. However, a medium to large effect size was shown which could indicate a significant relationship in a larger sample size. Originality/value – The findings of this research add to the literature already available and will be of interest to those who specialize in this area.
Journal
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 6, 2011
Keywords: Pancreatitis; Nutrition; Nasal bridle; Parenteral nutrition; Enteral nutrition; Patients; Health care; United States of America