Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Independent Online
Just how safe is South African meat?
South Africa Department of Agriculture and Rural Development: Veterinary Services
Red Meat HAS Audit Checklist
I. Seidman
Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for the Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences
Grant Mccracken (1988)
The long interview
W. Deming (1982)
Out of the Crisis
R. Govender, E. Genis (2010)
Advancing the hygiene management system at red meat abattoirs in GautengJournal for new generation sciences, 8
South Africa Department of Agriculture and Rural Development: Veterinary Services
Poultry HAS Audit Checklist
South Africa Department of Forestry and Fisheries
Standard for the Microbiological Monitoring of Meat
R. Govender
Assessing the effectiveness of the hygiene management system at South African abattoirs
S. Corey (1966)
Research in EducationNature, 209
W.E. Deming
Out of the Crisis. Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position
Purpose – The Hygiene Management System (HMS) is a regulated basic food safety system applicable to registered South African abattoirs. There is however, no specific requirement within the HMS that specifies continual improvement (CI). Continual improvement within management systems is critical to ensure that these systems remain relevant, efficient and effective over time. The purpose of this research is to determine the extent to which the HMS requirements facilitate CI and to suggest, if necessary, an approach on how the concept may be realized in practice. Design/methodology/approach – This study was conducted in two parts. The first part of the study developed continual improvement criteria benchmarking the ISO 9000 series. These criteria were then compared against the HMS requirements to determine the theoretical extent to which the HMS supports continual improvement. The second part of the study empirically tested the existing requirements of the HMS that support continual improvement. Findings – This research demonstrates that the HMS is, first designed to support CI to a limited extent and second is not, in practice, implemented towards CI. Originality/value – This paper presents regulators with gaps that exist within the present regulated HMS requirements in support of CI. It also provides abattoir managers with broad guidelines on how their implemented HMS can be designed towards CI. The research results may foster improvement within the regulated requirements of the HMS and implementation thereof towards improved handling and processing of safe meat at South African abattoirs.
The TQM Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 8, 2012
Keywords: Hygiene Management System; Hygiene Assessment System; Meat safety; Meat inspection; HACCP; Continual improvement; South Africa; Meat
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.