Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Kathleen Fear (2013)
Measuring and Anticipating the Impact of Data Reuse.
(n.d.)
About ICPSR
(2015)
About Open Context: publishing
P. Buneman, S. Khanna, W. Tan (2001)
Why and Where: A Characterization of Data Provenance
George Chin, C. Lansing (2004)
Capturing and supporting contexts for scientific data sharing via the biological sciences collaboratoryProceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Hong Huang (2015)
Domain knowledge and data quality perceptions in genome curation workJ. Documentation, 71
Christopher Lee (2007)
Taking Context Seriously: A Framework for Contextual Information in Digital Collections
P. Ingwersen, V. Chavan (2011)
Indicators for the Data Usage Index (DUI): an incentive for publishing primary biodiversity data through global information infrastructureBMC Bioinformatics, 12
Joan Beaudoin (2012)
A Framework for Contextual Metadata Used in the Digital Preservation of Cultural ObjectsD Lib Mag., 18
Ixchel Faniel, Eric Kansa, S. Kansa, Julianna Barrera-Gomez, E. Yakel (2013)
The challenges of digging data: a study of context in archaeological data reuse
Betsy Rolland, Charlotte Lee (2013)
Beyond trust and reliability: reusing data in collaborative cancer epidemiology researchProceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
S. Kansa, Eric Kansa, J. Schultz (2007)
An Open Context for "Near Eastern Archaeology"Near Eastern Archaeology, 70
S. Carlson, B. Anderson (2007)
What Are Data? The Many Kinds of Data and Their Implications for Data Re-UseJ. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 12
P. Darch, C. Borgman, Sharon Traweek, Rebekah Cummings, J. Wallis, A. Sands (2015)
What lies beneath?: Knowledge infrastructures in the subseafloor biosphere and beyondInternational Journal on Digital Libraries, 16
(2017)
Practices do not make perfect : disciplinary data sharing and reuse practices and their implications for repository data curation ”
Journal of Documentation, 67
Ann Zimmerman (2007)
Not by metadata alone: the use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuseInternational Journal on Digital Libraries, 7
Ann Zimmerman (2008)
New Knowledge from Old DataScience, Technology, & Human Values, 33
M. Jirotka, R. Procter, M. Hartswood, R. Slack, A. Simpson, C. Coopmans, C. Hinds, A. Voss (2005)
Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND Case StudyComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 14
Ixchel Faniel, Adam Kriesberg, E. Yakel (2012)
Data reuse and sensemaking among novice social scientists
Magenta Book (2011)
AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL REPOSITORIES
P. Edwards, M. Mayernik, A. Batcheller, G. Bowker, C. Borgman (2011)
Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaborationSocial Studies of Science, 41
Dharma Akmon, Ann Zimmerman, M. Daniels, M. Hedstrom (2011)
The application of archival concepts to a data-intensive environment: working with scientists to understand data management and preservation needsArchival Science, 11
P. Dourish (2004)
What we talk about when we talk about contextPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8
Karen Baker, L. Yarmey (2009)
Data Stewardship: Environmental Data Curation and a Web-of-RepositoriesInt. J. Digit. Curation, 4
Ixchel Faniel, Trond Jacobsen (2010)
Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ DataComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 19
N. House, M. Butler, Lisa Schiff (1998)
Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: sharing environmental planning data sets
R. Bettivia (2016)
The power of imaginary users: Designated communities in the OAIS reference modelProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53
M. Miles, A. Huberman (1994)
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
Kathleen Fear, D. Donaldson (2012)
Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositoriesArchival Science, 12
Jeremy Birnholtz, Matthew Bietz (2003)
Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineeringProceedings of the 2003 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
Richard Wang, D. Strong (1996)
Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data ConsumersJ. Manag. Inf. Syst., 12
Joan Beaudoin (2012)
Context and Its Role in the Digital Preservation of Cultural ObjectsD Lib Mag., 18
Richard Pearce-Moses, Mark Greene, R. Spindler, Diane Vogt-O'Connor, Laurie Baty (2005)
Glossary of Archival And Records Terminology
W. Scott (1955)
Reliability of Content Analysis ; The Case of Nominal Scale Cording, 19
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (2012)
Space data and information transfer systems – audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories
M. Berg, Els Goorman (1999)
The contextual nature of medical informationInternational journal of medical informatics, 56 1-3
N. House (2002)
Trust and epistemic communities in biodiversity data sharing
Ayoung Yoon (2016)
Red flags in data: Learning from failed data reuse experiencesProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53
(2015)
About the museum
Taking the researchers’ perspective, the purpose of this paper is to examine the types of context information needed to preserve data’s meaning in ways that support data reuse.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on a qualitative study of 105 researchers from three disciplinary communities: quantitative social science, archaeology and zoology. The study focused on researchers’ most recent data reuse experience, particularly what they needed when deciding whether to reuse data.FindingsFindings show that researchers mentioned 12 types of context information across three broad categories: data production information (data collection, specimen and artifact, data producer, data analysis, missing data, and research objectives); repository information (provenance, reputation and history, curation and digitization); and data reuse information (prior reuse, advice on reuse and terms of use).Originality/valueThis paper extends digital curation conversations to include the preservation of context as well as content to facilitate data reuse. When compared to prior research, findings show that there is some generalizability with respect to the types of context needed across different disciplines and data sharing and reuse environments. It also introduces several new context types. Relying on the perspective of researchers offers a more nuanced view that shows the importance of the different context types for each discipline and the ways disciplinary members thought about them. Both data producers and curators can benefit from knowing what to capture and manage during data collection and deposit into a repository.
Journal of Documentation – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 19, 2019
Keywords: User studies; Research work; Information studies; Data sharing; Data curation; Data reuse
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.