Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
William Dodds, K. Monroe, Dhruv Grewal (1991)
Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product EvaluationsJournal of Marketing Research, 28
K. Desai, Kevin Keller (2002)
The Effects of Ingredient Branding Strategies on Host Brand ExtendibilityJournal of Marketing, 66
R. Venkatesh, V. Mahajan, E. Muller (2000)
Dynamic co-marketing alliances: When and why do they succeed or fail?International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17
Bashar Gammoh, Kevin Voss, G. Chakraborty (2006)
Consumer evaluation of brand alliance signalsPsychology & Marketing, 23
C. Park, S. Jun, Allan Shocker (1996)
Composite Branding Alliances: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback EffectsJournal of Marketing Research, 33
Karmen Yoder, D. Kareken, Evan Morris (2018)
What Were They Thinking?That Sheep May Safely Graze
Peter Wright (1975)
Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying Vs. Optimizing:Journal of Marketing Research, 12
G. Chow (1960)
Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions (econometrics voi 28
Richard Klink, Daniel Smith (2001)
Threats to the External Validity of Brand Extension ResearchJournal of Marketing Research, 38
M. Yadav (1994)
How Buyers Evaluate Product Bundles: A Model of Anchoring and AdjustmentJournal of Consumer Research, 21
P. Farquhar (1989)
MANAGING BRAND EQUITY, 1
N. Anderson (1981)
Foundations of information integration theory
Bernard Simonin, Julie Ruth (1998)
Is a Company Known by the Company it Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand AttitudesJournal of Marketing Research, 35
G. Gaeth, I. Levin, G. Chakraborty, Aron Levin (1991)
Consumer evaluation of multi-product bundles: An information integration analysisMarketing Letters, 2
Kevin Keller (2003)
Brand Synthesis: The Multidimensionality of Brand KnowledgeJournal of Consumer Research, 29
P. Bottomley, S. Holden (2001)
Do We Really Know how Consumers Evaluate Brand Extensions? Empirical Generalizations Based on Secondary Analysis of Eight StudiesJournal of Marketing Research, 38
R. Venkatesh, V. Mahajan (1997)
Products with Branded Components: An Approach for Premium Pricing and Partner SelectionMarketing Science, 16
J. Wooldridge (1999)
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach
Kevin Voss, Bashar Gammoh (2004)
Building Brands through Brand Alliances: Does a Second Ally Help?Marketing Letters, 15
A. Rao, Lu Qu, Robert Ruekert (1999)
Signaling Unobservable Product Quality through a Brand AllyJournal of Marketing Research, 36
P. Bottomley, J. Doyle (1996)
The formation of attitudes towards brand extensions: Testing and generalising Aaker and Keller's modelInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 13
D. Aaker, Kevin Keller (1990)
Consumer Evaluations of Brand ExtensionsJournal of Marketing, 54
L. Sunde, R. Brodie (1993)
Consumer evaluations of brand extensions: Further empirical resultsInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 10
R. Fazio, M. Powell, C. Williams (1989)
The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior ProcessJournal of Consumer Research, 16
Purpose – This paper seeks to establish the importance of studying the effects of licensing brand alliances from a customer's standpoint, to investigate the effectiveness of licensing as a strategy by comparing it with a brand extension of a well‐known parent brand, and to provide a theoretical explanation for the licensing effects.Design/methodology/approach – In Study 1, subjects' attitudes were measured towards a lesser known brand with and without licensing by Sony, and Sony alone in a three‐factor (licensing, no licensing, and Sony) between‐subjects design. Study 2 compared a licensed brand with a brand extension of a well‐known brand using the Chow test.Findings – A brand “licensed by Sony” was evaluated higher than without licensing. Moreover, no difference was found between evaluation of a brand licensed by Sony and Sony alone. Study 2 revealed no significant difference between the data collected from a licensed brand and a well‐known brand extension, suggesting that being a licensed brand in some cases may be as effective as being an extension of a well‐known brand.Research limitations/implications – The research examined the effects of strong brand names (e.g. Sony). It would be interesting to extend the findings by examining the brand names that are perhaps less strong (e.g. Samsung) to test the generalizability of the research.Practical implications – For lesser‐known brands, licensing could be a viable strategy to increase their brand evaluation.Originality/value – For new brands, this paper provides evidence that licensing is a viable strategy, and also provides a theoretical explanation for the licensing effects.
Journal of Product & Brand Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 18, 2008
Keywords: Licensing; Brand management; Consumer behaviour
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.