Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Suggests that the construction industrys reputation for poor quality, including the failure to complete on time and within budget is welldeserved, but that quality management holds the key to great improvements in this contractual minefield. Examines the role played by arbitration as an alternative to the law courts in construction disputes, plus the various relationships involved in construction industry project management. Illustrates four frequently conflicting elements that must be resolved by discussion before the project gets under way and argues that good management depends on balancing conflicting demands and negotiating a settlement of potential and actual disputes. Shows how contract management adjudication procedures can be controlled, from the architects original design to the handover of the final buildingedifice, concluding that, alongside TQM, a neutral adjudication tribunal is more likely to bring about a solution if it recognises the particular management culture associated with the construction industry.
The TQM Magazine – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.