Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Stetson (2013)
Four heads are better than oneTeaching and Learning in Nursing, 8
V. Bruce (1982)
Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition.British journal of psychology, 73 Pt 1
R. Jenkins, A. Burton (2008)
100% Accuracy in Automatic Face RecognitionScience, 319
C. Frowd, F. Skelton, C. Atherton, Melanie Pitchford, Gemma Hepton, Laura Holden, A. McIntyre, P. Hancock (2012)
Recovering faces from memory: the distracting influence of external facial features.Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 18 2
C. Frowd, F. Skelton, Neelam Butt, Amal Hassan, S. Fields, P. Hancock (2011)
Familiarity effects in the construction of facial-composite images using modern software systemsErgonomics, 54
C. Frowd, V. Bruce, Carol Gannon, Mark Robinson, C. Tredoux, Jo Park, A. McIntyre, P. Hancock (2007)
Evolving the face of a criminal: how to search a face space more effectivelySoft Computing, 15
C. Frowd, F. Skelton, C. Atherton, P. Hancock (2012)
Evolving an identifiable face of a criminal.
P. Hancock (2000)
Evolving faces from principal componentsBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32
D. White, Amy Burton, R. Kemp (2016)
Not looking yourself: The cost of self-selecting photographs for identity verification.British journal of psychology, 107 2
R. Jenkins, D. White, X. Montfort, A. Burton (2011)
Variability in photos of the same faceCognition, 121
A. Burton, R. Jenkins, P. Hancock, D. White, M. Burton (2005)
Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averagesCognitive Psychology, 51
C. Frowd, V. Bruce, A. McIntyre, P. Hancock (2007)
The relative importance of external and internal features of facial composites.British journal of psychology, 98 Pt 1
C. Frowd, Laura Nelson, F. Skelton, Rosie Noyce, Rebecca Atkins, P. Heard, D. Morgan, S. Fields, Joanne Henry, A. McIntyre, P. Hancock (2012)
Interviewing Techniques for Darwinian Facial-Composite SystemsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 26
C. Frowd, Melanie Pitchford, V. Bruce, S. Jackson, Gemma Hepton, Maria Greenall, A. McIntyre, P. Hancock (2011)
The psychology of face construction: Giving evolution a helping hand.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25
G. Davies, A. Milne (1982)
Recognizing faces in and out of contextCurrent Psychology, 2
C. Carbon (2008)
Famous Faces as Icons. The Illusion of Being an Expert in the Recognition of Famous FacesPerception, 37
J. Schooler, Tonya Engstler-Schooler (1990)
Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaidCognitive Psychology, 22
C. Frowd, D. Carson, H. Ness, D. McQuiston-Surrett, Jan Richardson, H. Baldwin, P. Hancock (2005)
Contemporary composite techniques: The impact of a forensically-relevant target delay.Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10
V. Bruce, H. Ness, P. Hancock, Craig Newman, J. Rarity (2002)
Four heads are better than one: combining face composites yields improvements in face likeness.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 5
W. Dunlap, J. Cortina, Joel Vaslow, M. Burke (1996)
Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures DesignsPsychological Methods, 1
A. Burton, Stephen Wilson, Michelle Cowan, Vicki Bruce (1999)
Face Recognition in Poor-Quality Video: Evidence From Security SurveillancePsychological Science, 10
H. Ness, P. Hancock, Leslie Bowie, V. Bruce, G. Pike (2015)
Are two views better than one? Investigating three-quarter view facial compositesThe Journal of Forensic Practice, 17
J. Raaijmakers, J. Schrijnemakers, F. Gremmen (1999)
How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions.Journal of Memory and Language, 41
C. Frowd, W. Erickson, J. Lampinen, F. Skelton, A. McIntyre, P. Hancock (2015)
A decade of evolving composites: regression- and meta-analysisThe Journal of Forensic Practice, 17
G. Davies, P. Willik, L. Morrison (2000)
Facial composite production: a comparison of mechanical and computer-driven systems.The Journal of applied psychology, 85 1
C. Frowd, F. Skelton, Gemma Hepton, Laura Holden, Simra Minahil, Melanie Pitchford, A. McIntyre, Charity Brown, P. Hancock (2013)
Whole-face procedures for recovering facial images from memory.Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society, 53 2
C. Frowd (2012)
Craniofacial Identification: Facial recall and computer composites
C. Frowd, Melanie Pitchford, F. Skelton, Anna Petkovic, C. Prosser, B. Coates (2012)
Catching Even More Offenders with EvoFIT Facial Composites2012 Third International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies
Christopher Longmore, C. Liu, A. Young (2008)
Learning faces from photographs.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 34 1
C. Liu, James Ward (2006)
Face Recognition in Pictures is Affected by Perspective Transformation but Not by the Centre of ProjectionPerception, 35
T. Valentine, V. Bruce (1988)
Mental rotation of facesMemory & Cognition, 16
V. Bruce, Zöe Henderson, Karen Greenwood, P. Hancock, A. Burton, Paul Miller (1999)
Verification of face identities from images captured on video.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5
H. Clark (1973)
The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12
T. Valentine, Josh Davis, Kate Thorner, C. Solomon, S. Gibson (2010)
Evolving and combining facial composites: between-witness and within-witness morphs compared.Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 16 1
C. Frowd, S. Fields (2011)
Verbalization effects in facial composite productionPsychology, Crime & Law, 17
S. Gibson, C. Solomon, Matthew Maylin, Clifford Clark (2009)
New methodology in facial composite construction: from theory to practiceInt. J. Electron. Secur. Digit. Forensics, 2
F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, A. Buchner (2007)
G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciencesBehavior Research Methods, 39
C. Frowd, P. Hancock, D. Carson (2004)
EvoFIT: A holistic, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating compositesACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 1
R. Johnston, C. Barry (2001)
Best Face Forward: Similarity Effects in Repetition Priming of Face RecognitionQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54
C. Frowd, D. Carson, H. Ness, Jan Richardson, L. Morrison, Sarah Mclanaghan, P. Hancock (2005)
A forensically valid comparison of facial composite systemsPsychology, Crime & Law, 11
Purpose – Research suggests that memory for unfamiliar faces is pictorial in nature, with recognition negatively affected by changes to image-specific information such as head pose, lighting and facial expression. Further, within-person variation causes some images to resemble a subject more than others. Here, the purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of target-image choice on face construction using a modern evolving type of composite system, EvoFIT. Design/methodology/approach – Participants saw an unfamiliar target identity and then created a single composite of it the following day with EvoFIT by repeatedly selecting from arrays of faces with “breeding”, to “evolve” a face. Targets were images that had been previously categorised as low, medium or high likeness, or a face prototype comprising averaged photographs of the same individual. Findings – Identification of composites of low likeness targets was inferior but increased as a significant linear trend from low to medium to high likeness. Also, identification scores decreased when targets changed by pose and expression, but not by lighting. Similarly, composite identification from prototypes was more accurate than those from low likeness targets, providing some support that image averages generally produce more robust memory traces. Practical implications – The results emphasise the potential importance of matching a target's pose and expression at face construction; also, for obtaining image-specific information for construction of facial-composite images, a result that would appear to be useful to developers and researchers of composite software. Originality/value – This current project is the first of its kind to formally explore the potential impact of pictorial properties of a target face on identifiability of faces created from memory. The design followed forensic practices as far as is practicable, to allow good generalisation of results.
Journal of Forensic Practice – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 4, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.