Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Mezura-Montes, C. Coello (2005)
Useful Infeasible Solutions in Engineering Optimization with Evolutionary Algorithms
Shang He, E. Prempain, Q. Wu (2004)
An improved particle swarm optimizer for mechanical design optimization problemsEngineering Optimization, 36
K. Price, R. Storn, J. Lampinen
Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization
K. Parsopoulos, M. Vrahatis
Particle swarm optimization method for constrained optimization problems
Swagatam Das, A. Konar, U. Chakraborty (2005)
Improving particle swarm optimization with differentially perturbed velocity
P. Suganthan, N. Hansen, Jing Liang, K. Deb, Ying-Ping Chen, A. Auger, Santosh Tiwari (2005)
Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2005 Special Session on Real-Parameter Optimization
Juan Cabrera, C. Coello (2007)
Handling Constraints in Particle Swarm Optimization Using a Small Population Size
T. Blackwell (2005)
Particle swarms and population diversitySoft Computing, 9
R. Eberhart, Yuhui Shi (1998)
Comparison between Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization
R. Eberhart, Pat Simpson, R. Dobbins (1996)
Computational intelligence PC tools
Xiaohui Hu, R. Eberhart, Yuhui Shi (2003)
Engineering optimization with particle swarmProceedings of the 2003 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium. SIS'03 (Cat. No.03EX706)
R. Storn, K. Price (1997)
Differential evolution a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuJournal of Global Optimization
M. Settles, T. Soule (2005)
Breeding swarms: a GA/PSO hybrid
T. Runarsson, X. Yao (2000)
Stochastic ranking for constrained evolutionary optimizationIEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 4
Morten Løvbjerg, T. Rasmussen, T. Krink (2001)
Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimiser with breeding and subpopulations
Wenjun Zhang, Xiao-Feng Xie, De-Chun Bi (2004)
Handling boundary constraints for numerical optimization by particle swarm flying in periodic search spaceProceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8753), 2
P. Angeline (1998)
Evolutionary Optimization Versus Particle Swarm Optimization: Philosophy and Performance Differences
K. Price, R. Storn, J. Lampinen (2005)
Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series)
A. Aguirre, S. Rionda, C. Coello, G. Lizárraga, E. Montes (2004)
Handling constraints using multiobjective optimization conceptsInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 59
A. Hernández, A. Muñoz, E. Villa, S. Botello
COPSO: constrained optimization via PSO algorithm
J. Stefan, M. Daniel, M. Martin
A decentralization approach for swarm intelligence algorithms in networks applied to multi swarm PSO
Jing Liang, T. Runarsson, E. Mezura-Montes, M. Clerc, P. Suganthan, C. Coello, K. Deb (2006)
Problem Deflnitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2006 Special Session on Constrained Real-Parameter Optimization
J. Liang, T. Runarsson, E. Mezura‐Montes, M. Clerc, P. Suganthan, C. Coello, K. Deb
Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2006
E. Mezura
Alternatives to handle constraints in evolutionary optimization
J. Kennedy, R. Eberhart (1999)
The particle swarm: social adaptation in information-processing systems
E. Mezura-Montes, J. Velázquez-Reyes, C. Coello (2005)
Promising infeasibility and multiple offspring incorporated to differential evolution for constrained optimization
Wenjun Zhang, Xiao-Feng Xie (2003)
DEPSO: hybrid particle swarm with differential evolution operatorSMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483), 4
R. Storn, K. Price (1997)
Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous SpacesJournal of Global Optimization, 11
F. Bergh, A. Engelbrecht (2002)
An analysis of particle swarm optimizers
S. Hamida, A. Pétrowski (2000)
The need for improving the exploration operators for constrained optimization problemsProceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512), 2
T. Krink, J. Vesterstrom, J. Riget
Particle swarm optimization with spatial particle extension
G. Coath, S. Halgamuge (2003)
A comparison of constraint-handling methods for the application of particle swarm optimization to constrained nonlinear optimization problemsThe 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC '03., 4
K. Deb (2000)
An Efficient Constraint Handling Method for Genetic AlgorithmsComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 186
A. Zavala, Enrique Diharce, A. Aguirre (2005)
Particle Evolutionary Swarm for Design Reliability Optimization
G. Pulido, C. Coello (2004)
A constraint-handling mechanism for particle swarm optimizationProceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8753), 2
R. Storn (1999)
System design by constraint adaptation and differential evolutionIEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 3
T. Runarsson, X. Yao (2005)
Search biases in constrained evolutionary optimizationIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 35
Xiaohui Hu, R. Eberhart (2002)
Solving Constrained Nonlinear Optimization Problems with Particle Swarm Optimization
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a new constrained optimization algorithm based on a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm approach. Design/methodology/approach – This paper introduces a hybrid approach based on a modified ring neighborhood with two new perturbation operators designed to keep diversity. A constraint handling technique based on feasibility and sum of constraints violation is adopted. Also, a special technique to handle equality constraints is proposed. Findings – The paper shows that it is possible to improve PSO and keeping the advantages of its social interaction through a simple idea: perturbing the PSO memory. Research limitations/implications – The proposed algorithm shows a competitive performance against the state‐of‐the‐art constrained optimization algorithms. Practical implications – The proposed algorithm can be used to solve single objective problems with linear or non‐linear functions, and subject to both equality and inequality constraints which can be linear and non‐linear. In this paper, it is applied to various engineering design problems, and for the solution of state‐of‐the‐art benchmark problems. Originality/value – A new neighborhood structure for PSO algorithm is presented. Two perturbation operators to improve PSO algorithm are proposed. A special technique to handle equality constraints is proposed.
International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 22, 2008
Keywords: Optimization techniques; Programming and algorithm theory; Variance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.