Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Conformity or differentiation? A U-shaped relationship between peers’ CSR and focal firms’ CSR

Conformity or differentiation? A U-shaped relationship between peers’ CSR and focal firms’ CSR The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of peers’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) on focal firms’ CSR from an integrated perspective. The current study aims to explore whether as peers’ CSR increases focal firms’ CSR would first decrease and then increase.Design/methodology/approachThis study is based on a sample consisting of Chinese listed manufacturing firms from 2010 to 2016. Hypotheses are tested by generalized least squares method to minimum heterogeneity and autocorrelation concern.FindingsThe results show that focal firms’ CSR would first decrease and then increase with the increase in peers’ CSR. Furthermore, this paper found that corporate visibility would stress more value on CSR differentiation strategy and environmental uncertainty would stress more value on CSR conformity strategy, such that the U-shaped relationship would be more pronounced in high corporate visibility or low environmental uncertainty situation.Practical implicationsThe findings may be of interest to the academic researchers and managers. For researchers, it is important to understand how focal firms would practice CSR in response to peers’ CSR, especially through an integrated perspective. For managers, the results show that the best way to invest in CSR activities in response to peers’ CSR follows a U-shaped curve, and corporate visibility and environmental uncertainty are important factors to be considered to make CSR decisions.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by proposing and examining a U-shaped relationship between peers’ CSR and focal firms’ CSR, which stresses the conformity and differentiation value of CSR simultaneously. Besides, to fully map the effects of peers’ CSR and focal firms’ CSR, this paper considers the moderating roles of internal and external contingencies on this non-linear relationship between the peers’ CSR and focal firms’ CSR. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Chinese Management Studies Emerald Publishing

Conformity or differentiation? A U-shaped relationship between peers’ CSR and focal firms’ CSR

Long, Xianyi; Zhang, Ting
Chinese Management Studies , Volume 15 (2): 23 – Feb 8, 2021
Download PDF
23 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/conformity-or-differentiation-a-u-shaped-relationship-between-peers-oHW0OdYzZn
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1750-614X
DOI
10.1108/cms-04-2020-0157
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of peers’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) on focal firms’ CSR from an integrated perspective. The current study aims to explore whether as peers’ CSR increases focal firms’ CSR would first decrease and then increase.Design/methodology/approachThis study is based on a sample consisting of Chinese listed manufacturing firms from 2010 to 2016. Hypotheses are tested by generalized least squares method to minimum heterogeneity and autocorrelation concern.FindingsThe results show that focal firms’ CSR would first decrease and then increase with the increase in peers’ CSR. Furthermore, this paper found that corporate visibility would stress more value on CSR differentiation strategy and environmental uncertainty would stress more value on CSR conformity strategy, such that the U-shaped relationship would be more pronounced in high corporate visibility or low environmental uncertainty situation.Practical implicationsThe findings may be of interest to the academic researchers and managers. For researchers, it is important to understand how focal firms would practice CSR in response to peers’ CSR, especially through an integrated perspective. For managers, the results show that the best way to invest in CSR activities in response to peers’ CSR follows a U-shaped curve, and corporate visibility and environmental uncertainty are important factors to be considered to make CSR decisions.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by proposing and examining a U-shaped relationship between peers’ CSR and focal firms’ CSR, which stresses the conformity and differentiation value of CSR simultaneously. Besides, to fully map the effects of peers’ CSR and focal firms’ CSR, this paper considers the moderating roles of internal and external contingencies on this non-linear relationship between the peers’ CSR and focal firms’ CSR.

Journal

Chinese Management Studies – Emerald Publishing

Published: Feb 8, 2021

Keywords: Peers’ CSR; Focal firms’ CSR; Corporate visibility; Environmental uncertainty; Strategy balance

References

  • Safety in numbers: downsizing and the deinstitutionalization of permanent employment in Japan
    Ahmadjian, C.L.; Robinson, P.
  • Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development
    Bansal, P.
  • Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
    Barney, J.
  • Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational mortality
    Baum, J.A.C.; Singh, J.V.
  • Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: an empirical analysis
    Brammer, S.; Millington, A.
  • Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance
    Brammer, S.; Jackson, G.; Matten, D.
  • Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives
    Branco, M.C.; Rodrigues, L.L.
  • Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility
    Campbell, J.L.
  • Multiple large shareholders and corporate social responsibility reporting
    Cao, F.; Peng, S.; Ye, K.
  • When does corporate social responsibility reduce employee turnover? Evidence from attorneys before and after 9/11
    Carnahan, S.; Kryscynski, D.; Olson, D.
  • Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility
    Chen, T.; Dong, H.; Lin, C.
  • Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: the impact of resource allocation patterns
    Cheng, J.L.C.; Kesner, I.F.
  • Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice
    Child, J.
  • Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility
    David, A.W.; Donald, S.S.; Mansour, J.
  • To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance
    Deephouse, D.L.
  • Financial performance gaps and corporate social responsibility
    Deng, X.; Long, X.
  • External corporate social responsibility and labor productivity: a S-curve relationship and the moderating role of internal CSR and government subsidy
    Deng, X.; Long, X.; Schuler, D.A.; Luo, H.; Zhao, X.
  • The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
    Dimaggio, P.J.; Powell, W.W.
  • Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns
    Donaldson, L.; Davis, J.H.
  • The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications
    Donaldson, T.; Preston, L.E.
  • Does market competition dampen environmental performance? Evidence from China
    Duanmu, J.L.; Bu, M.L.; Pittman, R.
  • Sameness, otherness? Enriching organizational change theories with philosophical considerations on the same and the other
    Durand, R.; Calori, R.
  • Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: the construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts
    Elsbach, K.D.
  • Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization
    Flammer, C.
  • Opportunity platforms and safety nets: corporate citizenship and reputational risk
    Fombrun, C.J.; Gardberg, N.A.
  • The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits
    Friedman, M.
  • An urban grants economy revisited: corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979-81, 1987-89
    Galaskiewicz, J.
  • Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy
    Galaskiewicz, J.; Burt, R.S.
  • Philanthropic disaster relief giving as a response to institutional pressure: evidence from China
    Gao, Y.Q.
  • Government intervention, peers' giving and corporate philanthropy: evidence from Chinese private SMEs
    Gao, Y.Q.; Hafsi, T.
  • Do employees support corporate philanthropy? Evidence from Chinese listed companies
    Gao, Y.Q.; Yang, H.B.
  • Does charitable giving substitute or complement firm differentiation strategy? Evidence from Chinese private SMEs
    Gao, Y.; Hafsi, T.
  • Corporate giving and corporate financial performance: the S-curve relationship
    Gao, Y.; Yang, H.; Hafsi, T.
  • Corporate social responsibility of oil companies in developing countries: from altruism to business strategy
    Garcia-Rodriguez, F.J.; Garcia-Rodriguez, J.L.; Castilla-Gutierrez, C.; Major, S.A.
  • Environmental uncertainty and managers' use of discretionary accruals
    Ghosh, D.; Olsen, L.
  • The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective
    Godfrey, P.C.
  • Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues
    Greening, D.W.; Gray, B.
  • Thinking about U: theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-Shaped relationships in strategy research
    Haans, R.F.J.; Pieters, C.; He, Z.L.
  • Corporate governance and CSR nexus
    Harjoto, M.A.; Jo, H.
  • A Natural-Resource-Based view of the firm
    Hart, S.L.
  • Quantity versus quality: the impact of environmental disclosures on the reputations of UK plcs
    Hasseldine, J.; Salama, A.I.; Toms, J.S.
  • Modes of interorganizational imitation: the effects of outcome salience and uncertainty
    Haunschild, P.R.; Miner, A.S.
  • The meaning and meaningfulness of corporate social initiatives
    Hess, D.; Warren, D.E.
  • Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line?
    Hillman, A.J.; Keim, G.D.
  • Normalized collective corruption in a transitional economy: small treasuries in large Chinese enterprises
    Hung, H.
  • Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches
    Husted, B.W.; Allen, D.B.
  • What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions
    Ioannou, I.; Serafeim, G.
  • Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three Signal-Based mechanisms
    Jones, D.A.; Willness, C.R.; Madey, S.
  • Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: the causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change
    Kraatz, M.S.; Zajac, E.J.
  • Recognition for sustained corporate social responsibility: female directors make a difference
    Landry, E.E.; Bernardi, R.A.; Bosco, S.M.
  • A sociological theory of corporate finance societal responsibility and cost of equity in China
    Li, Y.H.; Foo, C.T.
  • Towards a theory of social responsibility reporting empirical analysis of 613 CSR reports by listed corporations in China
    Li, Y.H.; Zhang, J.; Foo, C.T.
  • Do female directors influence firms’ environmental innovation? The moderating role of ownership type
    Liao, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.
  • Whose call to answer: institutional complexity and firms’ CSR reporting
    Luo, X.R.; Wang, D.Q.; Zhang, J.J.
  • Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value
    Luo, X.; Bhattacharya, C.B.
  • Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance
    Mcguire, J.B.; Sundgren, A.; Schneeweis, T.
  • Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?
    McWilliams, A.; Siegel, D.
  • Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective
    McWilliams, A.; Siegel, D.
  • Decisions in organizations and theories of choice
    March, J.G.; Ven, A.H.V.D.; Joyce, W.F.
  • Institutionalized organizations: formal-structure as myth and ceremony
    Meyer, J.W.; Rowan, B.
  • Why ‘good’ firms do bad things: the effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality
    Mishina, Y.; Dykes, B.; Block, E.; Pollock, T.
  • The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards
    Nikolaeva, R.; Bicho, M.
  • Dare to be different? Investigating the relationship between analyst categorisation hierarchies and corporate social responsibility (CSR) conformity
    Pan, X.; Chen, X.; Yang, M.; Chen, X.
  • The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod
    Peng, M.W.; Sun, S.L.; Pinkham, B.; Chen, H.
  • The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment
    Peterson, D.K.
  • Standing out from the crowd: the visibility-enhancing effects of IPO-related signals on alliance formation by entrepreneurial firms
    Pollock, T.G.; Gulati, R.
  • Market watch: Information and availability cascades among the media and investors in the U S IPO Market
    Pollock, T.G.; Rindova, V.P.; Maggitti, P.G.
  • The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility
    Porter, M.E.; Kramer, M.R.
  • Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation
    Rindova, V.P.; Williamson, I.O.; Petkova, A.P.; Sever, J.M.
  • A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability
    Russo, M.V.; Fouts, P.A.
  • Having, giving, and getting: slack resources, corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance
    Seifert, B.; Morris, S.A.; Bartkus, B.R.
  • Globalization and the good corporation: a need for proactive co-existence
    Sethi, S.P.
  • Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities
    Sharma, S.; Vredenburg, H.
  • An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility
    Siegel, D.S.; Vitaliano, D.F.
  • From doing good to looking even better: the dynamics of CSR and reputation
    Tetrault Sirsly, C.A.; Lvina, E.; Chun, R.; Argandoña, A.; Choirat, C.; Siegel, D.S.
  • Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmentak reputation: some UK evidence
    Toms, J.S.
  • Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?
    Walls, J.L.; Berrone, P.; Phan, P.H.
  • Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: the roles of stakeholder response and political access
    Wang, H.L.; Qian, C.L.
  • Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance
    Wang, H.L.; Choi, J.P.; Li, J.T.
  • Corporate social responsibility: an overview and new research directions
    Wang, H.L.; Tong, L.; Takeuchi, R.; George, G.
  • Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan earthquake
    Zhang, R.; Rezaee, Z.; Zhu, J.
  • Corporate philanthropic giving, advertising intensity, and industry competition level
    Zhang, R.; Zhu, J.G.; Yue, H.; Zhu, C.Y.
  • Dare to be different? Conformity vs. Differentiation in corporate social activities of Chinese firms and market responses
    Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, X.
  • Optimal distinctiveness: broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management
    Zhao, E.Y.F.; Fisher, G.; Lounsbury, M.; Miller, D.
  • State ownership and firm innovation in China: an integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics
    Zhou, K.Z.; Gao, G.Y.; Zhao, H.X.