Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Computational design concept analysis: a Nordic comparison of four apartment buildings

Computational design concept analysis: a Nordic comparison of four apartment buildings Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic procedure to analyse the cost‐effectiveness of design concepts in residential construction, at the same time profiling differences in design concepts between four Nordic countries. Design/methodology/approach – The research methodology is computational. The study involved a comparison of design concepts and computational construction costs in a Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, and a Finnish apartment house built by Nordic subsidiaries of a larger international construction corporation. A reference value (type‐of‐space cost calculation) and a cost estimate relating to the design concept (conceptual cost estimate) were calculated for each project using the Finnish method of calculation. The results of the calculated construction costs were compared. Findings – The construction costs of the Swedish and Danish design concepts were high in comparison with the Finnish reference values. In both cases, the high construction costs were the result of low space efficiency and large window surface‐areas. The design concepts of the Norwegian and Finnish projects were cost‐efficient. Originality/value – The paper offers a systematic way to analyse design concepts in residential construction and profiles the differences in design concepts between four Nordic countries from the point‐of‐view of cost‐effectiveness. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Structural Survey Emerald Publishing

Computational design concept analysis: a Nordic comparison of four apartment buildings

Structural Survey , Volume 26 (1): 9 – Apr 4, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/computational-design-concept-analysis-a-nordic-comparison-of-four-AIumr0BtaQ
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0263-080X
DOI
10.1108/02630800810857426
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic procedure to analyse the cost‐effectiveness of design concepts in residential construction, at the same time profiling differences in design concepts between four Nordic countries. Design/methodology/approach – The research methodology is computational. The study involved a comparison of design concepts and computational construction costs in a Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, and a Finnish apartment house built by Nordic subsidiaries of a larger international construction corporation. A reference value (type‐of‐space cost calculation) and a cost estimate relating to the design concept (conceptual cost estimate) were calculated for each project using the Finnish method of calculation. The results of the calculated construction costs were compared. Findings – The construction costs of the Swedish and Danish design concepts were high in comparison with the Finnish reference values. In both cases, the high construction costs were the result of low space efficiency and large window surface‐areas. The design concepts of the Norwegian and Finnish projects were cost‐efficient. Originality/value – The paper offers a systematic way to analyse design concepts in residential construction and profiles the differences in design concepts between four Nordic countries from the point‐of‐view of cost‐effectiveness.

Journal

Structural SurveyEmerald Publishing

Published: Apr 4, 2008

Keywords: Housing; Design management; Finland; Norway; Sweden; Denmark

There are no references for this article.