Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Complexity theory and organizing form dualities

Complexity theory and organizing form dualities Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe how order‐generated rules applied to organizing form dualities can assist in creating the conditions for emergent, self‐organized behavior in organizations, thereby offering an operational deployment of complexity theory. Design/methodology/approach – The paper begins by showing that the concept of dualities is consistent with complexity‐thinking. In addition, when applied to organizing forms, dualities represent a practical way of affecting an organization's balance between chaos and order. Thus, when augmented with order‐generating rules, organizing form dualities provide an access point for the practical instigation of edge of chaos conditions and the potential for emergence. Findings – The paper maintains that many attempts to “manage” complexity have been associated with changes to organizing forms, specifically toward new forms of organizing. It is suggested that organizing form dualities provide some management guidance for encouraging the “edge of chaos” conditions advocated in complexity theory, although the details of self‐organization cannot be prescribed given the assumptions of non‐linearity associated with complexity theory perspectives. Finally, it is proposed that organizing dualities can elucidate the nature and application of order‐generating rules in non‐linear complex systems. Practical implications – Dualities offer some guidance toward the practical implementation of complexity theory as they represent an accessible sub‐system where the forces for order and chaos – traditional and new forms of organizing respectively – are accessible and subject to manipulation. Originality/value – The commonalities between dualities and complexity theory are intuitive, but little conceptual work has shown how the former can be employed as a guide to managing organizing forms. Moreover, this approach demonstrates that managers may be able to stimulate “edge of chaos” conditions in a practical way, without making positivistic assumptions about the causality associated with their efforts. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Management Decision Emerald Publishing

Complexity theory and organizing form dualities

Aaron C.T. Smith; Fiona Graetz
Management Decision , Volume 44 (7): 20 – Aug 1, 2006
Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/complexity-theory-and-organizing-form-dualities-aTbdB2xwD7
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0025-1747
DOI
10.1108/00251740610680569
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe how order‐generated rules applied to organizing form dualities can assist in creating the conditions for emergent, self‐organized behavior in organizations, thereby offering an operational deployment of complexity theory. Design/methodology/approach – The paper begins by showing that the concept of dualities is consistent with complexity‐thinking. In addition, when applied to organizing forms, dualities represent a practical way of affecting an organization's balance between chaos and order. Thus, when augmented with order‐generating rules, organizing form dualities provide an access point for the practical instigation of edge of chaos conditions and the potential for emergence. Findings – The paper maintains that many attempts to “manage” complexity have been associated with changes to organizing forms, specifically toward new forms of organizing. It is suggested that organizing form dualities provide some management guidance for encouraging the “edge of chaos” conditions advocated in complexity theory, although the details of self‐organization cannot be prescribed given the assumptions of non‐linearity associated with complexity theory perspectives. Finally, it is proposed that organizing dualities can elucidate the nature and application of order‐generating rules in non‐linear complex systems. Practical implications – Dualities offer some guidance toward the practical implementation of complexity theory as they represent an accessible sub‐system where the forces for order and chaos – traditional and new forms of organizing respectively – are accessible and subject to manipulation. Originality/value – The commonalities between dualities and complexity theory are intuitive, but little conceptual work has shown how the former can be employed as a guide to managing organizing forms. Moreover, this approach demonstrates that managers may be able to stimulate “edge of chaos” conditions in a practical way, without making positivistic assumptions about the causality associated with their efforts.

Journal

Management Decision – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 1, 2006

Keywords: Complexity theory; Chaos theory

References

  • Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system
    Adler, P.S.; Goldoftas, B.; Levine, D.I.
  • Embracing technology: the application of complexity theory to business
    Axerod, N.
  • Complexity theory and organization procedure design
    Brodbeck, P.
  • Implications for organization design: teams as pockets of excellence
    Brodbeck, P.
  • The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time‐paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations
    Brown, S.L.; Eisenhardt, K.M.
  • Kurt Lewin and complexity theories: back to the future?
    Burnes, B.
  • Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
    Checkland, P.
  • Model validation in soft systems practice
    Checkland, P.
  • Organizations unfettered: organizational form in an information‐intensive economy
    Child, J.; Mcgrath, R.
  • Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems
    Cilliers, P.
  • Commentary on the organization science special issue on complexity
    Cohen, M.
  • What enables self‐organizing behavior in businesses
    Coleman, H.
  • Scenarios for improvisation: long range planning redeemed
    da Cunha, J.V.; e Cunha, M.P.; Correia, M.F.
  • Complex systems as key drivers for the emergence of a resource‐and capability‐based interorganizational network
    Dagnino, G.
  • Complexity science: a worldview shift
    Dent, E.
  • Where do new organizational forms come from? Management logics as a source of coevolution
    Dijksterhuis, M.S.; Van Den Bosch, F.; Volberda, H.W.
  • The Twenty‐First Century Firm
    Dimaggio, P. (Ed)
  • Dualities: a paradigm for human resource and organizational development in complex multinationals
    Evans, P.; Doz, Y.
  • The Global Challenge: Frameworks for International Human Resource Management
    Evans, P.; Pucik, V.; Barsoux, J.
  • Theoretical perspectives on new forms of organizing
    Fenton, E.M.; Pettigrew, A.M.
  • Emancipatory potential of action learning: a critical analysis
    Fenwick, T.
  • Why not empowerment
    Foegen, J.
  • Forecastability, chaos and foresight
    Foo, C.; Foo, C.
  • Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox
    Ford, J.; Backoff, R.
  • Structuration theory and self‐organization
    Fuchs, C.
  • Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms
    Galunic, C.; Eisenhardt, K.
  • The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration
    Giddens, A.
  • Complex rhetoric and simple games
    Goldberg, J.; Markoczy, L.
  • Emergence as a construct: history and issues
    Goldstein, J.
  • Determining the indeterminacies of change leadership
    Grint, K.
  • Quantifying the complex adaptive workplace
    Haynes, B.; Price, I.
  • Exploration vs exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis
    He, Z.; Wong, P.
  • Camping on seesaws: prescriptions for a self designing organization
    Hedberg, B.; Nystrom, P.; Starbuck, W.
  • The network multilogue: a chaos approach to organizational design
    Hoogerwerf, E.; Poorthuis, A.
  • Complexity theory and strategic change: an empirically informed critique
    Houchin, K.; MacLean, D.
  • Dualism, duality and the complexity of economic institutions
    Jackson, W.
  • At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Complexity
    Kauffman, S.A.
  • New Rules for the New Economy
    Kelly, K.
  • Self‐organized transitions: a pattern amid the chaos of transformative change
    Lichtenstein, B.
  • Strategy of the Dolphin: Scoring A Win in a Chaotic World
    Lynch, D.; Kordis, P.
  • Integrating complexity theory, knowledge management and organizational learning
    McElroy, M.
  • Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets: strategies for rugged landscapes
    McKelvey, B.
  • Decision making as a simplification process: new conceptual perspectives
    McKenna, R.; Martin‐Smith, B.
  • Conditioned emergence: researching change and changing research
    MacIntosh, R.; MacLean, D.
  • Organizational extinction and complex systems
    Marion, R.; Bacon, J.
  • Organizations as co‐evolving complex adaptive systems
    Mittleton‐Kelly, E.
  • On the relationship between organizational complexity and organizational structuration
    Moldoveanu, M.; Bauer, R.
  • So what's new about complexity?
    Murray, P.
  • The organization of the future: strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century
    Nadler, D.A.; Tushman, M.L.
  • The ambidextrous organization
    O'Reilly, C.A.; Tushman, M.L.
  • Integrating knowledge in groups: how formal interventions enable flexibility
    Okhuysen, G.; Eisenhardt, K.
  • Chaos and complexity theory in management: an exploration from a critical systems thinking perspective
    Ortegon‐Monroy, M.C.
  • Out with the old and in with the new? the relationship between traditional and new organizational practices
    Palmer, I.; Dunford, R.
  • Surfing the edge of chaos
    Pascale, R.
  • Complementarities in action: organizational change and performance in BP and Unilever 1985‐2002
    Pettigrew, A.; Whittington, R.
  • The Innovating Organization
    Pettigrew, A.M.; Fenton, E.M. (Eds)
  • Innovative Forms of Organizing
    Pettigrew, A.M.; Whittington, R.; Melin, L.; Sanchez‐Runde, C.; Van Den Bosch, F.; Ruigrok, W.; Numagami, T.
  • A note on the correspondence between complexity and systems theory
    Phelan, S.E.
  • Order Out of Chaos
    Prigogine, I.; Stengers, I.
  • New forms of organizing
    Quinn, J.B.; Anderson, P.; Finkelstein, S.
  • Lead from the center: how to manage divisions dynamically
    Raynor, M.E.; Bower, J.L.
  • Systems theory and complexity: part 1
    Richardson, K.A.
  • The problematization of existence: towards a philosophy of complexity
    Richardson, K.A.
  • Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict
    Rosenhead, J.
  • Assessment, change and complexity
    Salem, P.
  • Managing dualities
    Sanchez‐Runde, C.J.; Pettigrew, A.M.
  • Consulting from a complexity perspective: intervening in the shadow systems of organizations
    Shaw, P.
  • From theory to practice: using new science concepts to create learning organizations
    Shelton, C.; Darling, J.
  • Complexity theory and change management in sport organizations
    Smith, A.
  • Complexity theory as a practical management tool: a critical evaluation
    Smith, A.; Humphries, C.
  • Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics
    Stacey, R.
  • The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change processes
    Stacey, R.
  • Complexity and Creativity in Organizations
    Stacey, R.
  • Emerging strategies for a chaotic environment
    Stacey, R.
  • Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity
    Stacey, R.
  • Ambiguous assets for uncertain environments: heterarchy in postsocialist firms
    Stark, D.
  • Participatory processes/paradoxical practices
    Stohl, C.; Cheney, G.
  • Non‐linear change in organizations: organization change management informed
    Styhre, A.
  • The viability of using various system theories to describe organizational change
    Sullivan, T.
  • Shifting paradigms: from Newton to chaos
    Tetenbaum, T.
  • Paradoxical requirements for a theory of organisational change
    Van de Ven, A.H.; Poole, M.S.
  • Building the Flexible Firm
    Volberda, H.W.
  • Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: a European panel study, 1992‐1996
    Whittington, R.; Pettigrew, A.; Peck, S.; Fenton, E.; Conyon, M.