Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Competence or flexibility? Survival and growth implications of competitive strategy preferences among small US businesses

Competence or flexibility? Survival and growth implications of competitive strategy preferences... Purpose – Research in strategic management has provided a wealth of contributions to the study of competition between firms, yet most strategic management theories were developed and refined for large firm contexts. This suggests the assumed theoretical relationships between strategy preference and performance may break down in the small business setting. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a data set from the National Federation of Independent Businesses to test hypotheses relating the strategy preferences of 754 small firms with the performance outcomes of survival and expected growth. Findings – Small businesses can focus on both survival and growth when they pursue competency‐based strategies, but they risk their very survival when pursuing flexibility‐based strategies. Virtually all small firms pursue strategies to compete, but some of the strategies they follow to pursue growth endanger their survival. Research limitations/implications – Because of life‐cycle and resource endowment factors, researchers should carefully parse differences between large and small firms when studying the relationship between strategy preferences and organizational performance. Practical implications – Small business owners should be aware that their choices of strategies to pursue growth may lead to unintended consequences, such as the demise of their firms. Originality/value – The paper demonstrates to researchers and practitioners how strategic preferences that presumably allow larger firms both to survive and grow do not have the same effects for smaller firms. The paper establishes boundary conditions for the effectiveness of flexibility strategies on performance in terms of firm size. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Strategy and Management Emerald Publishing

Competence or flexibility? Survival and growth implications of competitive strategy preferences among small US businesses

Journal of Strategy and Management , Volume 6 (4): 22 – Oct 25, 2013

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/competence-or-flexibility-survival-and-growth-implications-of-8k493CibNp

References (125)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1755-425X
DOI
10.1108/JSMA-06-2012-0034
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – Research in strategic management has provided a wealth of contributions to the study of competition between firms, yet most strategic management theories were developed and refined for large firm contexts. This suggests the assumed theoretical relationships between strategy preference and performance may break down in the small business setting. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a data set from the National Federation of Independent Businesses to test hypotheses relating the strategy preferences of 754 small firms with the performance outcomes of survival and expected growth. Findings – Small businesses can focus on both survival and growth when they pursue competency‐based strategies, but they risk their very survival when pursuing flexibility‐based strategies. Virtually all small firms pursue strategies to compete, but some of the strategies they follow to pursue growth endanger their survival. Research limitations/implications – Because of life‐cycle and resource endowment factors, researchers should carefully parse differences between large and small firms when studying the relationship between strategy preferences and organizational performance. Practical implications – Small business owners should be aware that their choices of strategies to pursue growth may lead to unintended consequences, such as the demise of their firms. Originality/value – The paper demonstrates to researchers and practitioners how strategic preferences that presumably allow larger firms both to survive and grow do not have the same effects for smaller firms. The paper establishes boundary conditions for the effectiveness of flexibility strategies on performance in terms of firm size.

Journal

Journal of Strategy and ManagementEmerald Publishing

Published: Oct 25, 2013

Keywords: Entrepreneurship; Small business; Competency‐based strategies; Firm growth; Flexbility‐based strategies; Strategic choice

There are no references for this article.