Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comparison of 3D magnetodynamic formulations in terms of potentials with imposed electric global quantities

Comparison of 3D magnetodynamic formulations in terms of potentials with imposed electric global... Methods to impose a voltage or a current in massive conductors in dual magnetodynamic potential formulations ( A ‐ ϕ and T ‐ K I‐Ω) are presented. In the A ‐ ϕ formulation, a supply voltage can be naturally imposed at the terminals of a conductor, but not a supply current. An equation must be added. This is the opposite for the T ‐ K I‐Ω formulation. In the paper all methods are described and compared on the basis of an example. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Emerald Publishing

Comparison of 3D magnetodynamic formulations in terms of potentials with imposed electric global quantities

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/comparison-of-3d-magnetodynamic-formulations-in-terms-of-potentials-HlFDBvMZD2
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0332-1649
DOI
10.1108/03321640410553319
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Methods to impose a voltage or a current in massive conductors in dual magnetodynamic potential formulations ( A ‐ ϕ and T ‐ K I‐Ω) are presented. In the A ‐ ϕ formulation, a supply voltage can be naturally imposed at the terminals of a conductor, but not a supply current. An equation must be added. This is the opposite for the T ‐ K I‐Ω formulation. In the paper all methods are described and compared on the basis of an example.

Journal

COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic EngineeringEmerald Publishing

Published: Dec 1, 2004

Keywords: Finite element analysis

References