Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Armour
Xers mark the workplace
E. Weiss, B. Fisher (1998)
Should we teach women to interrupt? Cultural variables in management communication coursesWomen in Management Review, 13
A. Mariño, Ján Zábojník (2004)
Internal competition for corporate resources and incentives in teamsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 35
Eric Olson, O. Walker, Robert Ruekert, Joseph Bonner (2001)
Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performanceJournal of Product Innovation Management, 18
Bob Filipczak (1994)
It's Just a Job: Generation X at Work., 31
C. Carr
Managing self‐managed workers
H. Alerton, B. Tulgan
Pop quiz
Ian Hunter (2008)
Talking about My GenerationCritical Inquiry, 34
L. Coleman, M. Hladíková, M. Savelyeva (2006)
The baby boomer marketJournal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 14
Susan Rhodes (1983)
Age-Related Differences in Work Attitudes and Behavior: A Review and Conceptual AnalysisPsychological Bulletin, 93
K. Smola, C. Sutton (2002)
Generational differences: revisiting generational work values for the new millenniumJournal of Organizational Behavior, 23
A. Meltzer, M. Weiss (2002)
The X generation.Archives of surgery, 137 9
D. Kyles (2006)
Managing your multigenerational workforceHuman Resource Management International Digest, 14
G. O'bannon (2001)
Managing Our Future: The Generation X FactorPublic Personnel Management, 30
P. Sweeney, David Lee (1999)
Support and Commitment Factors of Project TeamsEngineering Management Journal, 11
G. Stewart, Charles Manz, H. Sims (1998)
Team Work and Group Dynamics
D. Tjosvold (1988)
Working Together to Get Things Done: Managing for Organizational Productivity
T. Peters (1988)
Thriving on Chaos
N. Ramamoorthy, P. Flood (2002)
Employee Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions: A Test of the Main and Moderating Effects of Individualism-Collectivism OrientationsHuman Relations, 55
J. Bertsch
Bringing Xers aboard
Marie-Thérèse Claes (1999)
Women, men and management stylesInternational Labour Review, 138
N. Ramamoorthy, S. Carroll (1998)
Individualism/Collectivism Orientations and Reactions Toward Alternative Human Resource Management PracticesHuman Relations, 51
J. Wagner (1995)
Studies of Individualism-Collectivism: Effects on Cooperation in GroupsAcademy of Management Journal, 38
Susan Eisner (2005)
Managing generation YIEEE Engineering Management Review, 39
B. Tulgan (1997)
Generation X: Slackers? Or the workforce of the future?Employment Relations Today, 24
Corbo Sa (1997)
The X-er files. They're young, techno-hip job-hoppers. And maybe the perfect health care workers.Hospitals & Health Networks, 71
Michael Morris, D. Davis, J. Allen (1994)
Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship: Cross-Cultural Comparisons of the Importance of Individualism Versus CollectivismJournal of International Business Studies, 25
L. Khoo, S. Tor, S.S.G. Lee (1998)
The Potential of Intelligent Software Agents in the World Wide Web in Automating Part ProcurementJournal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34
D. Wentworth, R. Chell (1997)
American College Students and the Protestant Work EthicJournal of Social Psychology, 137
R. Bennett (1999)
THE RELATIVE EFFECTS OF SITUATIONAL PRACTICES AND CULTURALLY INFLUENCED VALUES/BELIEFS ON WORK ATTITUDESInternational Journal of Commerce and Management, 9
Chris Lee (1994)
The Feminization of Management., 31
B. Walsh, T. Vacha-haase, J. Kapes, J. Dresden, W. Thomson, B. Ochoa-Shargey (1996)
The Values Scale: Differences Across Grade Levels for Ethnic Minority StudentsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 56
Chao-chuan Chen, Xiao-ping Chen, J. Meindl (1998)
How can Cooperation be Fostered? The Cultural Effects of Individualism-CollectivismAcademy of Management Review, 23
N. Ramamoorthy, P. Flood (2004)
Individualism/Collectivism, Perceived Task Interdependence and Teamwork Attitudes among Irish Blue-Collar Employees: a Test of the Main and Moderating Effects?Human Relations, 57
R. Rees (1976)
The team approach.Western Journal of Medicine, 125
R. Abraham (1997)
The relationship of vertical and horizontal individualism and collectivism to intrapreneurship and organizational commitmentLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 18
T. Tang, J. Tzeng (1992)
Demographic Correlates of the Protestant Work EthicThe Journal of Psychology, 126
Ucko Tj, Kazemek Ea (1986)
Creating effective work teams.Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, 40
Henry Singer, P. Abramson (1973)
Values of Business Administrators: A Longitudinal StudyPsychological Reports, 33
S. Caudron
Tie individual pay to team success
Jennifer Chatman, Sigal Barsade (1995)
Personality, Organizational Culture, and Cooperation: Evidence from a Business Simulation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 40
Purpose – This paper seeks to examine the attitudes of the largest groups in today's workforce, the baby boomers (born between 1945 and 1962) and generation X (born between 1963 and 1982) on team formation. The study measures individualism‐collectivism levels on five dimensions in both groups. Design/methodology/approach – Based on survey research ( n =434), data were analyzed using factor analyses (extraction and rotation choices) consistent with previous research. Findings – The findings demonstrate that an updated paradigm for team‐building needs to be developed that encourages individual identity and personal values as well as those of the group. Research limitations/implications – The authors did not examine all of the potential social and cultural influences on team behaviour (e.g. nationality, ethnicity or religious influences). Future research should attempt to either measure or control for more of these variables. Practical implications – Past management paradigms on team formation must be adapted to current managerial needs. The “melting‐pot” analogy, where individual team members completely subordinate themselves to the needs of the team, is obsolete. A more appropriate analogy would be the “salad bowl”, where individuals work together, yet do not have to give up their individuality. This paradigm might pose new challenges in its implementation, but the greater acceptance of diversity can, paradoxically, foster a greater level of authentic team spirit. Originality/value – This research examines the generational effects on teamwork within a changing workforce. Managers directly involved with team formation and maintenance are likely to be those who benefit most from this research. However, everyone involved in a team‐based environment should find it useful.
Management Research News – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 18, 2007
Keywords: Team working; Individual behaviour; Collectivism; Baby buster generation; Baby boomer generation; Demography
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.