Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Patrick Lowenthal, C. Snelson (2017)
In search of a better understanding of social presence: an investigation into how researchers define social presenceDistance Education, 38
Linh Dinh, Trang Nguyen (2020)
Pandemic, social distancing, and social work education: students’ satisfaction with online education in VietnamSocial Work Education, 39
Alenka Tratnik, Marko Urh, E. Jereb (2019)
Student satisfaction with an online and a face-to-face Business English course in a higher education contextInnovations in Education and Teaching International, 56
S. Dhawan (2020)
Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 CrisisJournal of Educational Technology Systems, 49
Xin Cheng, L. Chan, San-Qiang Pan, Hongmei Cai, Yun-Qing Li, Xuesong Yang (2020)
Gross Anatomy Education in China during the Covid‐19 Pandemic: A National SurveyAnatomical Sciences Education, 14
Nick Deschacht, K. Goeman (2015)
The effect of blended learning on course persistence and performance of adult learners: A difference-in-differences analysisComput. Educ., 87
Satu Viertiö, O. Kiviruusu, Maarit Piirtola, J. Kaprio, T. Korhonen, M. Marttunen, J. Suvisaari (2020)
Factors contributing to psychological distress in the working population, with a special reference to gender differenceBMC Public Health, 21
Abdallah Naser, E. Dahmash, Rabaa Al-Rousan, H. Alwafi, Hamzeh Alrawashdeh, I. Ghoul, Anwer Abidine, Mohammed Bokhary, H. Al-Hadithi, D. Ali, Rasha Abuthawabeh, Ghada Abdelwahab, Yosra Alhartani, Haneen Muhaisen, Ayah Dagash, Hamad Alyami (2020)
Mental health status of the general population, healthcare professionals, and university students during 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak in Jordan: A cross‐sectional studyBrain and Behavior, 10
Khadijah Mukhtar, Kainat Javed, Mahwish Arooj, A. Sethi (2020)
Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic eraPakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36
Y. Kuo, A. Walker, Kerstin Schroder, B. Belland (2014)
Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education coursesInternet High. Educ., 20
A. Gonzales, Jessica Calarco, Teresa Lynch (2018)
Technology Problems and Student Achievement Gaps: A Validation and Extension of the Technology Maintenance ConstructCommunication Research, 47
M. Rohman, Marji, D. Sudjimat, R. Sugandi, D. Nurhadi (2020)
Online Learning in Higher Education During Covid-19 Pandemic: Students’ Perceptions, 12
J. Bransford, R. Stevens, Daniel Schwartz, Andy Meltzoff, R. Pea, J. Roschelle, N. Vye, P. Kuhl, P. Bell, Brigid Barron, B. Reeves, N. Sabelli (2006)
Learning Theories and Education: Toward a Decade of Synergy
Yuk-Ming Tang, P. Chen, Kris Law, Chun-Ho Wu, Yui-yip Lau, Jieqi Guan, Dan He, G. Ho (2021)
Comparative analysis of Student's live online learning readiness during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the higher education sectorComputers & Education, 168
R. Wallace (2003)
Online Learning in Higher Education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and studentsEducation, Communication & Information, 3
María Sánchez, Carmen De-Pablos-Heredero, José-Amelio Medina-Merodio, R. Robina‐Ramírez, L. Fernández-Sanz (2021)
Relationships among relational coordination dimensions: Impact on the quality of education online with a structural equations modelTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 166
Mathijs Haas, R. Faber, M. Hamersma (2020)
How COVID-19 and the Dutch ‘intelligent lockdown’ change activities, work and travel behaviour: Evidence from longitudinal data in the NetherlandsTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 6
M. Fawaz, A. Samaha (2020)
E-learning: Depression, anxiety, and stress symptomatology among Lebanese university students during COVID-19 quarantine.Nursing forum
P. Lovibond, S. Lovibond (1995)
The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories.Behaviour research and therapy, 33 3
Oliver Keis, Claudia Grab, Achim Schneider, W. Öchsner (2017)
Online or face-to-face instruction? A qualitative study on the electrocardiogram course at the University of Ulm to examine why students choose a particular formatBMC Medical Education, 17
Vasile Gherheș, C. Stoian, M. Fărcașiu, Miroslav Stanici (2021)
E-Learning vs. Face-To-Face Learning: Analyzing Students’ Preferences and BehaviorsSustainability, 13
K.V. Unger (1998)
Handbook on Supported Education: Providing Accommodations and Service for Students with Psychiatric Disabilities
M. Wilczewski, Oleg Gorbaniuk, P. Giuri (2021)
The Psychological and Academic Effects of Studying From the Home and Host Country During the COVID-19 PandemicFrontiers in Psychology, 12
Timon Elmer, Kieran Mepham, Christoph Stadtfeld (2020)
Students under lockdown: Comparisons of students’ social networks and mental health before and during the COVID-19 crisis in SwitzerlandPLoS ONE, 15
M. Ajmal, Saghir Ahmad (2019)
Exploration of Anxiety Factors among Students of Distance Learning: A Case Study of Allama Iqbal Open University., 41
The purpose of this study is a comparative analysis of psychological distress between online and on-campus learning among university students. The study was performed to investigate the comparative analysis of psychological distress between online and on-campus learning among university students.Design/methodology/approachThis study is a quantitative, comparative study. Data were collected through convenient sampling technique from different university students. The sample size of the study was (n = 200) and the sample was taken from universities. Three scales, students’ readiness learning scale, DASS-21 Scale and on-campus learning scale, were used for data collection and the data were analyzed statistically. The analysis was carried out by the statistical tests correlation test, t-test and linear regression.FindingsIt was revealed through this study that on-campus learning is more preferred by the students than online learning. The findings were that online learning has more psychological distress among students than on-campus learning. Additionally, it was found that as compared to males, females have more tendency toward depression, anxiety and stress. Findings also revealed that married students have a larger tendency toward depression, anxiety and stress as compared to unmarried students. No socioeconomic significance difference was found. Moreover, it was revealed that working students prefer online learning to on-campus learning.Practical implicationsLearning has a significant impact on students’ future settlement, independence and well-being. The findings of this research study can contribute to understanding the educational system and determining which learning system is better for students and for the students’ mental well-being.Originality/valueLearning has a significant impact on students’ future settlement, independence and well-being. This paper contributes by offering practical insights for educators and policymakers.
Mental Health and Social Inclusion – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 3, 2024
Keywords: Online learning; Psychological distress; On-campus learning
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.