Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Fassler
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law
M.A. Glendon, M.W. Gordon, C. Osakwe
Comparative Legal Traditions
Craig Bradley (1985)
Two Models of the Fourth AmendmentMichigan Law Review, 83
D. Feldman
Regulating treatment of suspects in police stations: judicial interpretation of detention provisions in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
William Pizzi, Luca Marafioti (1992)
The New Italian Code of Criminal Procedure: The Difficulties of Building an Adversarial Trial System on a Civil Law FoundationYale Journal of International Law, 17
R. Traynor (1962)
Mapp v. Ohio at Large in the Fifty StatesDuke Law Journal, 1962
John Langbein (1977)
Comparative Criminal Procedure: Germany
A. West, Y. Desdevises, A. Fenet, D. Gaurier, M. Heussaff
The French Legal System
A. Goldstein, Martin Marcus (1977)
The Myth of Judicial Supervision in Three "Inquisitorial" Systems: France, Italy, and GermanyYale Law Journal, 87
Thomas Swenson (1995)
The German "Plea Bargaining" DebatePace International Law Review
M. Wilkey
Why suppress valid evidence
Y. Kamisar (1989)
Duckworth v. Eagan: A Little-Noticed Miranda Case that May Cause Much Mischief
H. Monaghan (1975)
The Supreme Court, 1974 TermHarvard Law Review, 89
Justice Department’s Office of Legal Policy
Report to the Attorney General on the law of pre‐trial interrogation
M. Graham
Tightening the Reins of Justice in America
Edward Tomlinson (1983)
Nonadversarial Justice: the French ExperienceMaryland Law Review, 42
R.J. Traynor
Mapp v. Ohio at large in the 50 states
Welsh White, Craig Bradley (1995)
Improving Constitutional Criminal ProcedureMichigan Law Review, 93
J. Bentham
The Works of Jeremy Bentham
L. Leigh (1975)
Police powers in England and Wales
Jeffrey Walker (1993)
A Comparative Discussion of the Privilege Against Self-IncriminationSocial Science Research Network
Y. Kamisar (1983)
Does (Did) (Should) the Exclusionary Rule Rest on a Principled Basis Rather Than an Empirical Proposition
S. Field, Andrew West (1995)
A tale of two reforms: French defense rights and police powers in transitionCriminal Law Forum, 6
B. Canon (1974)
Is the Exclusionary Rule in Failing Health? Some New Data and a Plea Against a Precipitous ConclusionKentucky Law Journal, 62
E.A. Tomlinson
The saga of wiretapping in France: what it tells us about the French criminal procedure system”,
Richard Frase, Thomas Weigend (1995)
German Criminal Justice As a Guide to American Law Reform: Similar Problems, Better Solutions?Boston College international and comparative law review, 18
Craig Bradley (1983)
The Exclusionary Rule in GermanyHarvard Law Review, 96
M. Berger
Legislating confession law in Great Britain: a statutory approach to police interrogations
Walter Pakter (1985)
Exclusionary Rules in France, Germany, and Italy, 9
Di Birch
The PACE hots up: confessions and confusions under the 1984 Act
G. Williams
Evidence obtained by illegal means
K. Grevling
Fairness and the exclusion of evidence under section 78(1) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act
S.P. Freccero
An introduction to the new Italian criminal procedure
H.P. Monaghan
The Supreme court 1974 term: forward: constitutional common law
G. Van Kessel
Adversary excesses in the American criminal trial
L. Crocker (1993)
Can the Exclusionary Rule Be SavedJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 84
Craig Bradley (1993)
The Emerging International Consensus as to Criminal Procedure RulesMichigan journal of international law, 14
B.F. Shanks
Comparative analysis of the exclusionary rule and its alternatives
R. Schlesinger
Comparative criminal procedure: a plea for utilizing foreign experience
William Heffernan, Richard Lovely (1991)
Evaluating the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Problem of Police Compliance with the LawUniversity of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 24
(1977)
Crimes and punishments.The Hastings Center report, 7 4
R. Posner (1982)
Excessive Sanctions for Governmental Misconduct in Criminal CasesWashington Law Review, 57
G. Mueller, Le Fre, J. Edwards, G. Williams, J. Wang (1969)
Comparative Criminal Procedure
S. Sharpe
Covert policing: a comparative view
G. Goodpaster (1982)
An Essay on Ending the Exclusionary RuleHastings Law Journal, 33
The exclusionary rule remains one of the most controversial doctrines in America’s constitutionalized criminal procedure. Jurists and commentators criticize the American exclusionary rule as a rule unique to American jurisprudence. Though American jurists and commentators’ criticism focuses on the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule, the criticism of the American exclusionary rule with reference to practices in foreign countries serves to create and maintain the misconception that the United States is the only country that has the exclusionary rule. The belief that the exclusionary rule exists only in the United States is far from accurate. This article examines the historical development and the current status of exclusionary rules in the United States, England, France, Germany, and Italy. Attentions are especially devoted to analyzing the characteristics of the American exclusionary rule with reference to exclusionary rules in other countries.
Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 1, 1999
Keywords: USA; Law; Crime; England; France; Germany; Italy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.