Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Company secretary: a role of breadth and majesty

Company secretary: a role of breadth and majesty PurposeThis paper aims to present the outcomes from 40 one-to-one semi-structured interviews and 12 focus group sessions with company secretaries, chairmen, CEOs, chief financial officer (CFOs), senior independent director (SIDs) and NEDs, about the role of the company secretary.Design/methodology/approachLukes’ (1974, 2005) third dimension of power is engaged in thematic analysis of this strategic leadership role and its contribution to Board effectiveness.FindingsThe findings identify “discretionary capacity” as being critical to effective role contribution.Research limitations/implicationsWhilst the inquiry included international participants, e.g. multi-national Board members and company secretaries, it was conducted within the UK.Practical implicationsHaving a range of discretion is particularly necessary at this time, when the new governance regime is broadening its demands on the role of the company secretary to interact with wider stakeholders.Social implicationsBetter Board effectiveness is critical to broader sustainability of business in society.Originality/valueAn emergent model of the company secretary role is offered as a tool for building discretionary capacity, based on key technical, commercial and social characteristics, in their contexts – understood together as “Breadth” and “Majesty”. Breadth establishes a competency, whereas majesty, the refined high-level social qualities. This study concludes that the company secretary role is highly dependent on the preferences of the chairman, in enabling them to make an effective contribution to the Board. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Society and Business Review Emerald Publishing

Company secretary: a role of breadth and majesty

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/company-secretary-a-role-of-breadth-and-majesty-V5bzc8GvAX

References (87)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1746-5680
DOI
10.1108/SBR-04-2016-0023
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to present the outcomes from 40 one-to-one semi-structured interviews and 12 focus group sessions with company secretaries, chairmen, CEOs, chief financial officer (CFOs), senior independent director (SIDs) and NEDs, about the role of the company secretary.Design/methodology/approachLukes’ (1974, 2005) third dimension of power is engaged in thematic analysis of this strategic leadership role and its contribution to Board effectiveness.FindingsThe findings identify “discretionary capacity” as being critical to effective role contribution.Research limitations/implicationsWhilst the inquiry included international participants, e.g. multi-national Board members and company secretaries, it was conducted within the UK.Practical implicationsHaving a range of discretion is particularly necessary at this time, when the new governance regime is broadening its demands on the role of the company secretary to interact with wider stakeholders.Social implicationsBetter Board effectiveness is critical to broader sustainability of business in society.Originality/valueAn emergent model of the company secretary role is offered as a tool for building discretionary capacity, based on key technical, commercial and social characteristics, in their contexts – understood together as “Breadth” and “Majesty”. Breadth establishes a competency, whereas majesty, the refined high-level social qualities. This study concludes that the company secretary role is highly dependent on the preferences of the chairman, in enabling them to make an effective contribution to the Board.

Journal

Society and Business ReviewEmerald Publishing

Published: Oct 10, 2016

There are no references for this article.