Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Brad MacDonald, Robert Dunkelberger (1998)
Full-Text Database Dependency: An Emerging Trend Among Undergraduate Library Users?Research Strategies, 16
J. Agee (2005)
Collection evaluation: a foundation for collection developmentCollection Building, 24
(2005)
2004/) Collection analysis using circulation, ILL, and collection data”, Against the Grain, December/January
(1979)
Evaluating library collections: a case study
Sonia Bodi, Katie Maier-O’Shea (2005)
The Library of Babel: Making Sense of Collection Management in a Postmodern World.The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31
M. Munroe, Jennie Steeg (2004)
The Decision‐Making Process in Conspectus Evaluation of Collections: The Quest for CertaintyThe Library Quarterly, 74
Association of Colleges and Research Libraries (ACRL)
Guidelines for Instruction Programs in Academic Libraries
M. Pankake, Karin Wittenborg, E. Carpenter (1995)
Commentaries on Collection Bias
Doris Kampen (2004)
Development and Validation of the Multidimensional Library Anxiety ScaleCollege & Research Libraries, 65
Peggy Johnson (2004)
Fundamentals of Collection Development and Management
S. Intner (2003)
Making your collections work for you: collection evaluation myths & realitiesLibrary Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 27
M. Pankake, Karin Wittenborg, E. Carpenter (1995)
Commentaries on Collection Bias - Collection Bias: Eternal Vigilance the Price of Liberty; Collection Bias: What's Right; Adequate Representation and Numeric Equivalency: How Much Is Enough?College & Research Libraries, 56
W. Henderson, W. Hubbard, Sonja McAbee (1993)
Collection assessment in academic libraries: Institutional effectiveness in microcosmLibrary Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 17
American Library Association
Books for College Libraries
Neal Gross, Arnold Lutzker, Bernard Sorkin, Richard Weisgrau (1976)
Library of CongressAfrican Research & Documentation
Purpose – The intent of this article is to illustrate outcomes and results of a collection analysis done by a smaller academic library. Design/methodology/approach – The collection was evaluated using an online analysis tool combined with a physical inventory of the collection. Findings – Peer group comparisons revealed some of the problems with this particular collection were also widespread among the comparison libraries. The value of the e‐book collection to patrons was clear: not only did e‐books provide resources to remote students; they help compensate for shortfalls in the print collection. Practical implications – The catalog more accurately reflects what is on the shelf and also what is reported to OCLC. Access to the collection has been improved and enhanced. Steps were taken to refocus the library's collection development procedures and management. The changes made have led to increased faculty involvement in selection and a more balanced, more comprehensive collection management plan. Originality/value – For any library considering whether they can or should do an analysis, the article illustrates that the benefits are well worth the time and expense. The analysis had a positive impact on collection development and management.
Collection Building – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 4, 2008
Keywords: Collections management; Academic staff; User interfaces; Data analysis; Academic libraries
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.