Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Co-leadership to co-design in mental health-care ecosystems: what does it mean to us?

Co-leadership to co-design in mental health-care ecosystems: what does it mean to us? This study aims to demonstrate how service providers, service users and their families should be able to share the co-leadership, co-auspicing, co-ownership, and co-governance, of a the mental health-care ecosystem, at every level, as it develops upwards and wider, in a process of inclusivity, conviviality and polyphonic discourse, via the overlapping phases of co-creativity, codesign, co-production, co-delivery, co-evaluation, co-research and co-replication, to achieve outcomes of co-communal or organisational well-being.Design/methodology/approach“Co-design” is shorthand code for encouraging multiple pathways and trajectories toward forming and sustaining a sparkling web or vibrant network of inclusive opportunities for stakeholder participation and a collaborative partnership in organizational development, in these circumstances, for more effective mental health services (MHSs).FindingsIn a co-design framework, all partners should be entitled to expect and “to have and to hold” an ongoing equal stake, voice and power in the discourse from start to finish, in a bottom-up process which is fostered by an interdisciplinary leadership group, providing the strong foundation or nutrient-rich and well-watered soil and support from which a shared endeavor can grow, blossom and generate the desired fruit in ample quality and quantity.Originality/valueThe authors should be working toward co-design and co-production of contemporary MHSs in a mental health-care ecosystem. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Leadership in Health Services Emerald Publishing

Co-leadership to co-design in mental health-care ecosystems: what does it mean to us?

Rosen, Alan; Holmes, Douglas John
Leadership in Health Services , Volume 36 (1): 18 – Jan 27, 2023
Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/co-leadership-to-co-design-in-mental-health-care-ecosystems-what-does-dEehfVmR5F
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1751-1879
eISSN
1751-1879
DOI
10.1108/lhs-06-2022-0065
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study aims to demonstrate how service providers, service users and their families should be able to share the co-leadership, co-auspicing, co-ownership, and co-governance, of a the mental health-care ecosystem, at every level, as it develops upwards and wider, in a process of inclusivity, conviviality and polyphonic discourse, via the overlapping phases of co-creativity, codesign, co-production, co-delivery, co-evaluation, co-research and co-replication, to achieve outcomes of co-communal or organisational well-being.Design/methodology/approach“Co-design” is shorthand code for encouraging multiple pathways and trajectories toward forming and sustaining a sparkling web or vibrant network of inclusive opportunities for stakeholder participation and a collaborative partnership in organizational development, in these circumstances, for more effective mental health services (MHSs).FindingsIn a co-design framework, all partners should be entitled to expect and “to have and to hold” an ongoing equal stake, voice and power in the discourse from start to finish, in a bottom-up process which is fostered by an interdisciplinary leadership group, providing the strong foundation or nutrient-rich and well-watered soil and support from which a shared endeavor can grow, blossom and generate the desired fruit in ample quality and quantity.Originality/valueThe authors should be working toward co-design and co-production of contemporary MHSs in a mental health-care ecosystem.

Journal

Leadership in Health Services – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 27, 2023

Keywords: Total quality management; Mental health; Decision-making; Consumers; Leadership; Attitudes

References

  • Recovery, personalisation and personal budgets
    Alakeson, V.; Perkins, R.
  • A ladder of citizen participation
    Arnstein, S.R.
  • Mental health service use and need for care of Australians without diagnoses of mental disorders: findings from a large epidemiological survey
    Bobevski, I.; Rosen, A.; Meadows, G.
  • The challenge of co-production: how equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services
    Boyle, D.; Harris, M.
  • Social systems intervention and crisis resolution
    Bridgett, C.; Polak, P.
  • Social systems intervention and crisis resolution
    Bridgett, C.; Polak, P.
  • A role for lived experience mental health leadership in the age of Covid-19
    Byrne, L.; Wykes, T.
  • Cultural continuity as a moderator of suicide risk among Canada’s first nations
    Chandler, M.J.; Lalonde, C.E.; Kirmayer, L.; Valaskakis, G.
  • Integrating clinicians, knowledge and data: expert-based cooperative analysis in healthcare decision support
    Gibert, K.; García-Alonso, C.; Salvador-Carulla, L.
  • Doing what we can, but knowing our place: being an ally to promote consumer leadership in mental health
    Happell, B.; Scholz, B.
  • Co-research: a new methodology for new times
    Hartley, J.; Benington, J.
  • Harvard leadership styles: six leadership strategies
  • Shared perspectives on authentic co-design: putting consumers and carers at the centre of mental health reform
    Holmes, D.
  • In this together building knowledge about co-production 2011
  • Beyond the clinic, or context matters, keynote address
    Jones, N.
  • Lived experience, research leadership, and the transformation of mental health services: building a researcher pipeline
    Jones, N.; Atterbury, K.; Byrne, L.; Carras, M.; Brown, M.; Phalen, P.
  • Co-leadership – a management solution for integrated health and social care
    Klinga, C.; Hansson, J.; Hasson, H.; Sachs, M.A.
  • User and community co-production of public services: what does the evidence tell us?
    Loeffler, E.; Bovaird, T.
  • The practice of freedom: human rights and the global mental health agenda
    Mezzina, R.; Rosen, A.; Amering, M.; Javed, A.; Javed, A.; Fountoulakis, K.S.
  • Community Organization and the Provision of Police Services
    Ostrom, E.; Baugh, W.H.
  • From residential facilities to supported housing: the personal health budget model as a form of coproduction
    Ridente, P.; Mezzina, R.
  • Devening the role of the consultant psychiatrist in a public mental health service
    Rosen, A.
  • Chapter on Australia: from colonial rivalries to a national mental health strategy
    Rosen, A.; Thornicroft, G.; Tansella, M.
  • Chapter on Australia: from colonial rivalries to a national mental health strategy
    Rosen, A.; Thornicroft, G.; Tansella, M.
  • Must try harder: Australia's half-hearted attempts at transition from hospital-centric to community-based mental health services
    Rosen, A.
  • What does co-design, co-production and co-delivery mean to me?”, In: Co-design: shared perspectives in authentic co-design: the co-design initiative
    Rosen, A.
  • ‘The Doctor's Dilemma’ revisited: how can we operationalise working ‘Two Ways mental health services-combining the best of Western evidence-based psychiatric practices with optimal use of traditional healing practices for all indigenous communities?
    Rosen, A.
  • Interdisciplinary teamwork and leadership: issues for psychiatrists
    Rosen, A.; Callaly, T.
  • Becoming real: from model programs to implemented services
    Rosen, A.; Diamond, R.J.; Miller, V.; Stein, L.I.; Hollingsworth, E.J.
  • The future of community psychiatry and community mental health services
    Rosen, A.; Gill, N.S.; Salvador-Carulla, L.
  • International trends in community mental health services
    Rosen, A.; O’Halloran, P.; Mezzina, R.; McQuiston, H.; Sowers, W.J.; Ranz, J.
  • Commentary on: Happell, B. and Scholz, B (2018)
    Russo, J.; Beresford, P.; O'Hagan, M.
  • Review of stockman DA
    Schneider, W.
  • Five-year experience of first episode nonaffective psychosis in open-dialogue approach: treatment principles, follow-up outcomes, and two case studies
    Seikkula, J.; Aaltonen, J.; Alakare, B.; Haarakangas, K.; Keränen, J.; Lehtinen, K.
  • This is the correct link for the Spice Consulting reference
  • Royal commission into victoria’s mental health system
  • The mental health matrix: a manual to improve services
    Thornicroft, G.; Tansella, M.
  • A first-hand experience of co-design in mental health service design: opportunities, challenges, and lessons
    Tindall, R.M.; Ferris, M.; Townsend, M.; Boschert, G.; Moylan, S.
  • A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey
    Voorberg, W.; Bekkers, H.; Tummers, M.; , L.; , G.
  • 16: The containment of democratic innovation: reflections from two university collaborations
    Webb, D.; Mallo, D.; Tardiveau, A.; Emmerson, C.; Pardoe, M.; Talbot, M.
  • Australia's national mental health strategy
    Whiteford, H.; Buckingham, B.; Manderscheid, R.
  • British Columbia project, consumer participation manual
  • World HO global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services
  • The surprising benefits of co-leadership because two brains really are better than one
  • Consumers as coproducers of public services: some economic and institutional considerations
    Parks, R.B.; Baker, P.C.; Kiser, L.; Oakerson, R.; Ostrom, E.; Ostrom, V.; Percy, S.L.; Vandivort, M.B.; Whitaker, G.P.; Wilson, R.
  • The kit: a guide to the advocacy we choose to do, booklet
  • Co-delivering public services with users and communities
    Weeks, N.