Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Closing the researcher-practitioner gap

Closing the researcher-practitioner gap The purpose of this paper is to investigate the extent to which learning gained through participation in three research methods workshops funded by an Arts and Humanities Research Council networking grant was applied in practice.Design/methodology/approachData were collected by online survey and focus group from individuals who participated in the Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project workshops in 2011/2012. The survey data were coded and analysed manually, as were the transcribed focus group discussions.FindingsFollowing the conclusion of the DREaM project the participants at the core of the network applied their learning from the workshops to innovate in the workplace and to develop information services, with evident impact on end-users of library and information services. The strongest impact of the DREaM project, however, was found in reports of widened opportunities for the researcher and practitioner cadre members, many of which arose from collaborations. This provides evidence of a second proven strategy (in addition to the provision of research reports in practitioner publications) for narrowing the library and information science (LIS) research-practice gap: the creation of researcher-practitioner networks.Research limitations/implicationsCollaborative interactions between academic researchers and practitioners bring benefits to both network participants themselves and to the wider communities with which they interact. These are likely to be applicable across a range of subject domains and geographies.Practical implicationsNetwork grants are valuable for furnishing learning that may be applied in practice, and for bridging the research-practice gap.Social implicationsIn LIS and other domains that suffer from a research-practice gap (e.g. teaching, social work, nursing, policing, management) the bringing together of researchers and practitioners in networks may address problems associated with misunderstandings between the two communities, and lead to improved services provision.Originality/valueThis study provides an evaluation of network development that goes beyond simply reporting changes in network topology. It does so by assessing the value that network relationships provide to individuals and groups, extending knowledge on mechanisms of collaborative interaction within research networks. It is also the first detailed study of the impact of a UK research council networking grant. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Documentation Emerald Publishing

Closing the researcher-practitioner gap

Hall, Hazel; Cruickshank, Peter; Ryan, Bruce
Journal of Documentation , Volume 75 (5): 26 – Sep 12, 2019
Download PDF
26 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/closing-the-researcher-practitioner-gap-05KjRYtO0N
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0022-0418
DOI
10.1108/jd-12-2018-0212
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the extent to which learning gained through participation in three research methods workshops funded by an Arts and Humanities Research Council networking grant was applied in practice.Design/methodology/approachData were collected by online survey and focus group from individuals who participated in the Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project workshops in 2011/2012. The survey data were coded and analysed manually, as were the transcribed focus group discussions.FindingsFollowing the conclusion of the DREaM project the participants at the core of the network applied their learning from the workshops to innovate in the workplace and to develop information services, with evident impact on end-users of library and information services. The strongest impact of the DREaM project, however, was found in reports of widened opportunities for the researcher and practitioner cadre members, many of which arose from collaborations. This provides evidence of a second proven strategy (in addition to the provision of research reports in practitioner publications) for narrowing the library and information science (LIS) research-practice gap: the creation of researcher-practitioner networks.Research limitations/implicationsCollaborative interactions between academic researchers and practitioners bring benefits to both network participants themselves and to the wider communities with which they interact. These are likely to be applicable across a range of subject domains and geographies.Practical implicationsNetwork grants are valuable for furnishing learning that may be applied in practice, and for bridging the research-practice gap.Social implicationsIn LIS and other domains that suffer from a research-practice gap (e.g. teaching, social work, nursing, policing, management) the bringing together of researchers and practitioners in networks may address problems associated with misunderstandings between the two communities, and lead to improved services provision.Originality/valueThis study provides an evaluation of network development that goes beyond simply reporting changes in network topology. It does so by assessing the value that network relationships provide to individuals and groups, extending knowledge on mechanisms of collaborative interaction within research networks. It is also the first detailed study of the impact of a UK research council networking grant.

Journal

Journal of Documentation – Emerald Publishing

Published: Sep 12, 2019

Keywords: Collaboration; Research; Skills; Librarians; Research methods; Communities; Practitioners

References

  • Identifying and communicating the contributions of library and information services in hospitals and academic health sciences centers
    Abels, E.G.; Cogdill, K.W.; Zach, L.
  • Measuring impact of twelve information scientists using the DCI index
    Ahlgren, P.; Järvelin, K.
  • UK public library roles and value: a focus group analysis
    Appleton, L.; Hall, H.; Duff., A.; Raeside, R.
  • The academic–practitioner gap in Spanish library and information science: an analysis of authorship and collaboration in two leading national publications
    Ardanuy, J.; Urbano, C.
  • Developing a generic tool to routinely measure the impact of health libraries
    Ayre, S.; Brettle, A.; Gilroy, D.; Knock, D.; Mitchelmore, R.; Pattison, S.; Smith, S.; Turner, J.
  • Smoother pebbles and the shoulders of giants: the developing foundations of information science
    Bawden, D.
  • Integrating research into LIS field experiences in academic libraries
    Berg, S.A.; Hoffmann, K.; Dawson, D.
  • Towards better models and methods
    Best, A.; Holmes, B.
  • Publication patterns of US academic librarians from 2003 to 2012
    Blecic, D.D.; Wiberley, S.E.; De Groote, S.L.; Cullars, J.; Shultz, M.; Chan, V.
  • Bridging the research-practice gap? The role of evidence based librarianship
    Booth, A.
  • What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey
    Bornmann, L.
  • Librarians as research partners: their contribution to the scholarly endeavour beyond library and information science
    Borrego, A.; Ardanuy, J.; Urbano, C.
  • Design-based research for LIS
    Bowler, L.; Large, A.
  • The impact of clinical librarian services on patients and health care organisations
    Brettle, A.; Maden, M.
  • We have a DREaM: the developing research excellence and methods network
    Brettle, A.; Hall, H.; Oppenheim, C.
  • Evaluating clinical librarian services: a systematic review
    Brettle, A.; Maden-Jenkins, M.; Anderson, L.; McNally, R.; Pratchett, T.; Tancock, J.; Thornton, D.; Webb, A.
  • The impact of medical libraries and literature on patient care in New Zealand
    Burton, J.E.
  • How can payback from health services research be assessed?
    Buxton, M.; Hanney, S.
  • What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners? The perspectives of academic educational researchers
    Cherney, A.; Povey, J.; Head, B.; Boreham, P.; Ferguson, M.
  • Facets of DREaM: a social network analysis exploring network development in the UK LIS research community
    Cooke, L.; Hall, H.
  • Identity-creators and image-makers: using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place
    Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.
  • Enhancing the impact of LIS research projects
    Cruickshank, P.; Hall, H.; Taylor-Smith, E.
  • RIMS: the research impact measurement service at the University of New South Wales
    Drummond, R.; Wartho, R.
  • Interactions between library, archive and information management researchers and library, archive and management professionals
    Eve, J.; Schenk, N.
  • Research and practice: findings from the Interactions project
    Eve, J.; Schenk, N.
  • We need to rethink ‘impact’ – the findings from the Longitudinal studies strategic review
    Fairbairn, R.
  • LIS research in the United Kingdom: reflections and prospects
    Feather, J.
  • Librarians as authors in higher education and teaching and learning journals in the twenty-first century: an exploratory study
    Folk, A.L.
  • Planning for impact, assessing for sustainability
    Fried, S.; Kochanowicz, M.; Chiranov, M.
  • Knowledge exchange and police practice: broadening and deepening the debate around researcher–practitioner collaborations
    Fyfe, N.R.; Wilson, P.
  • Effectiveness of training health professionals in literature search skills using electronic health databases - a critical appraisal
    Garg, A.; Turtle, K.M.
  • Research intelligence – panning for gold dust in midstream
    Gibney, E.
  • Bracing for impact: the role of information science in supporting societal research impact
    Given, L.M.; Kelly, W.; Willson, R.
  • Qualitative research practice: implications for the design and implementation of a research impact assessment in Australia
    Given, L.M.; Winkler, D.; Willson, R.
  • Communicating research to practice: the role of professional association publications
    Haddow, G.
  • Communication of research to practice in library and information science: closing the gap
    Haddow, G.; Klobas, J.E.
  • UK library and information science research matters
    Hall, H.
  • Long-term community development within a researcher network: a social network analysis of the DREaM project cadre
    Hall, H.; Cruickshank, P.; Ryan, B.
  • Mapping the library, archives, records, information and knowledge management and related professions in the United Kingdom: final report
    Hall, H.; Raeside, R.; Chen, T.; Dutton, M.; Irving, C.; Ryan, B.
  • Exploring the library’s contribution to the academic institution: research agenda
    Hernon, P.; Schwartz, C.
  • Impact of end-user search training on pharmacy students: a four-year follow-up study
    Ikeda, N.R.; Schwartz, D.G.
  • Worth their weight: an assessment of the evolving field of library evaluation
    Imholz, S.I.; Arns, J.W.
  • ISO 16439:2014 – information and documentation: methods and procedures for assessing the impact of libraries
  • What is research impact assessment (RIA)?
  • How do public libraries create social capital? A preliminary investigation into the relationship
    Johnson, C.
  • Assessing policy and practice impacts of social science research: the application of the payback framework to assess the Future of Work programme
    Klautzer, L.; Hanney, S.; Nason, E.; Rubin, J.; Grant, J.; Wooding, S.
  • Beliefs, attitudes and perceptions about research and practice in a professional field
    Klobas, J.E.; Clyde, L.A.
  • Assessing the impact of evidence summaries in library and information practice
    Kloda, L.A.; Koufogiannakis, D.; Brettle, A.
  • Editorial comments
    Kratcoski, P.C.
  • Project information
  • VAMP – laying the foundations
    Lockyer, S.; Conyers, A.; Creaser, C.
  • Identifying customer expectations is key to evidence based service delivery
    McKnight, S.; Booth, A.
  • Fostering a research culture in UK library practice: barriers and solutions
    McMenemy, D.
  • The eVALUEd toolkit: a framework for the qualitative evaluation of electronic information services
    McNicol, S.
  • Measuring the added value of library and information services: the New Zealand approach
    MacEachern, R.
  • Beyond REF 2014: the impact of impact assessment on the future of information research
    Marcella, R.; Lockerbie, H.; Bloice, L.
  • The effects of the research excellence framework research excellence agenda on early- and mid-career researchers in library and information science
    Marcella, R.; Lockerbie, H.; Bloice, L.; Hood, C.; Barton, F.
  • Facilitating the impact implementation programme
    Markless, S.; Streatfield, D.
  • Measuring the value and impact of health library and information services: past reflections, future possibilities
    Marshall, J.G.
  • Performance evaluation of academic libraries: implementation model
    Melo, L.B.; Pires, C.
  • Job search information behaviours: an ego-net study of networking amongst young job-seekers
    Mowbray, J.; Hall, H.; Raeside, R.; Robertson, P.J.
  • Determining the impact of health library services on patient care: a review of the literature
    O’Connor, P.
  • The value of academic libraries: a comprehensive research review and report
    Oakleaf, M.
  • Using the h-Index to rank influential British researchers in Information Science and Librarianship
    Oppenheim, C.
  • The practitioner’s experience and conception of evidence based library and information practice: an exploratory analysis
    Partridge, H.; Edwards, S.; Thorpe, C.; Hallam, G.
  • The big gap remains
    Penta, M.; McKenzie, P.J.
  • Evidence-based management
    Pfeffer, J.; Sutton, R.I.
  • Impact measures for library and information services
    Poll, R.; Payne, P.
  • A LIS collaboratory to bridge the research-practice gap
    Ponti, M.
  • Library and information science practitioners and research
    Powell, R.R.; Baker, L.M.; Mika, J.
  • How can your research have more impact? New research provides 5 key principles and practical tips
    Reed, M.; Attlee, A.
  • Understanding friendship and learning networks of international students using longitudinal social network analysis
    Rienties, B.; Nolan, E.-M.
  • Methods for demonstrating the value of public libraries in the UK: a literature review
    Rooney-Browne, C.
  • Practitioners and academics as authors and readers: the case of LIS journals
    Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.
  • Examining information behavior through social networks: an interdisciplinary review
    Schultz-Jones, B.
  • Research impact and legislatures
  • Co-citation and cluster analyses of extant literature on social networks
    Shiau, W.-L.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Yang, H.S.
  • Exploring new ways of working using virtual research environments in library and information science
    Sonnenwald, D.H.; Lassi, M.; Olson, N.; Ponti, M.; Axelsson, A.-S.
  • Regulating Internet access and content in UK public libraries: findings from the MAIPLE project
    Spacey, R.; Cooke, L.; Cresser, C.; Muir, A.
  • Library impact data project: looking for the link between library usage and student attainment
    Stone, G.; Ramsden, B.
  • The library impact data project: hit, miss or maybe?
    Stone, G.; Pattern, D.; Ramsden, B.
  • Impact assessment stories: decisions, decisions
    Struck, B.
  • Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: a review of the literature
    Sugimoto, C.R.; Work, S.; Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.
  • Absorbing research: the role of university research in business and market innovation
    Ternouth, P.; Herrmann, K.; Docherty, D.
  • Value and impact measurement: a UK perspective and progress report on a national programme (VAMP)
    Town, S.
  • The use of applied library and information studies (LIS) research in New Zealand libraries
    Turner, K.J.
  • From outcomes to process: evidence for a new approach to research impact assessment
    Upton, S.; Vallance, P.; Goddard, J.
  • Reflections on the value and impact of library and information services
    Urquhart, C.; Turner, J.
  • Patterns of perceived public library outcomes in five countries
    Vakkari, P.; Aabo, S.; Audunson, R.; Huysmans, F.; Kwon, N.; Oomes, M.; Sei-Ching, J.S.
  • The value and impact of information provided through library services for patient care: developing guidance for best practice
    Weightman, A.; Urquhart, C.; Spink, S.; Thomas, R.
  • A collaborative approach to defining the usefulness of impact: lessons from a knowledge exchange project involving academics and social work practitioners
    Wilkinson, H.; Gallagher, M.; Smith, M.
  • A comparative review of how the policy and procedures to assess research impact evolved in Australia and the UK
    Williams, K.; Grant, J.
  • The place of research in library service
    Williamson, C.
  • Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: a case study of the library and information science field
    Zhao, D.
  • Incorporating a research-minded approach in professional practice
    Hall, H.
  • Meeting the challenges of LIS research: a national coalition approach
    Hall, H.