Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Close encounters and the illusion of accountability in the sharing economy

Close encounters and the illusion of accountability in the sharing economy Online ratings and reviews have recently emerged as mechanisms to facilitate accountability and transparency in the provision of goods and services. The purpose of this paper is to examine the nature and outcome of the accountability that online ratings and reviews create in the sharing economy.Design/methodology/approachThe study draws on 30 face-to-face and Skype interviews with Airbnb guests and hosts as well as on secondary materials, including content from Airbnb data analytic reports.FindingsThe authors demonstrate that face-saving practices widely condition user ratings and comments. Face saving occurs when individuals attempt to preserve their own identity and the identity of others during a social interaction. At Airbnb, the authors find that reviewers adopt three distinct face-saving strategies: the use of private reviewing channels, the creation of tactful reviews and refraining from reviewing entirely. The authors also find that users are sceptical of rating metrics and public comments and draw upon a wide range of alternative sources, such as private messaging and other publicly available resources, in their decision making.Originality/valueThis paper highlights the overwhelmingly positive character of Airbnb ratings and reviews. It proposes the concept of crowdbased accountability as a limited, partial form of assurance for sharing economy users. Guests and hosts alike prioritise face-saving practices over reviewer responsibilities to provide authentic, reliable accounts to the public. Consequently, reviewers effectively remove the risk of sanctions for those in the network who underperform. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal Emerald Publishing

Close encounters and the illusion of accountability in the sharing economy

Download PDF
30 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/close-encounters-and-the-illusion-of-accountability-in-the-sharing-ByjLCWFas9

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0951-3574
DOI
10.1108/aaaj-09-2017-3156
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Online ratings and reviews have recently emerged as mechanisms to facilitate accountability and transparency in the provision of goods and services. The purpose of this paper is to examine the nature and outcome of the accountability that online ratings and reviews create in the sharing economy.Design/methodology/approachThe study draws on 30 face-to-face and Skype interviews with Airbnb guests and hosts as well as on secondary materials, including content from Airbnb data analytic reports.FindingsThe authors demonstrate that face-saving practices widely condition user ratings and comments. Face saving occurs when individuals attempt to preserve their own identity and the identity of others during a social interaction. At Airbnb, the authors find that reviewers adopt three distinct face-saving strategies: the use of private reviewing channels, the creation of tactful reviews and refraining from reviewing entirely. The authors also find that users are sceptical of rating metrics and public comments and draw upon a wide range of alternative sources, such as private messaging and other publicly available resources, in their decision making.Originality/valueThis paper highlights the overwhelmingly positive character of Airbnb ratings and reviews. It proposes the concept of crowdbased accountability as a limited, partial form of assurance for sharing economy users. Guests and hosts alike prioritise face-saving practices over reviewer responsibilities to provide authentic, reliable accounts to the public. Consequently, reviewers effectively remove the risk of sanctions for those in the network who underperform.

Journal

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 8, 2019

Keywords: Goffman; Crowdbased accountability; Airbnb; Online reviews; Face-works; Social cooling

References

  • Superhost
  • Make your listing standout
  • Uber’s ratings terrorize drivers and trick riders: why not fix them?
    Bercovici, J.
  • Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling
    Biernacki, P.; Waldorf, D.
  • If nearly all Airbnb reviews are positive, does that make them meaningless?
    Bridges, J.; Vásquez, C.
  • A framework for designing co-regulation models well-adapted to technology-facilitated sharing economies
    Cannon, B.; Chung, H.
  • Tempers flare at Yelp’s town hall for small business owners in L.A
    Chang, A.
  • What percent of Airbnb hosts leave reviews for their guests?
    Chen, R.
  • Uber drivers: a disputed employment relationship in light of the sharing economy
    DeBruyne, N.L.
  • The sound of silence in online feedback: estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias
    Dellarocas, C.; Wood, C.
  • An economy of access is opening for business: five strategies for success
    Denning, S.
  • Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms
    Dubnick, M.
  • Managing impressions online: self-presentation processes in the online dating environment
    Ellison, N.; Heino, R.; Gibbs, J.
  • Governance and accountability: a shift in conceptualisation
    Erkkilä, T.
  • Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds
    Espeland, W.N.; Sauder, M.
  • Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity
    Fehr, E.; Gächter, S.
  • Bias and reciprocity in online reviews: evidence from field experiments on Airbnb
    Fradkin, A.; Grewal, E.; Holtz, D.; Pearson, M.
  • The construction of auditability: MBA rankings and assurance in practice
    Free, C.; Salterio, S.E.; Shearer, T.
  • Online reporting: accounting in cybersociety
    Gallhofer, S.; Haslam, J.
  • On fieldwork
    Goffman, E.
  • The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement
    Gouldner, A.W.
  • Giving and sharing in the computer-mediated economy
    Harvey, J.; Smith, A.; Golightly, D.
  • Airbnb is Inc.’s 2014 company of the year
    Helm, B.
  • A netnographic exploration
    Jayanti, R.K.
  • Beyond the boring grey: the construction of the colourful accountant
    Jeacle, I.
  • Constructing audit society in the virtual world: the case of the online reviewer
    Jeacle, I.
  • In TripAdvisor we trust: rankings, calculative regimes and abstract systems
    Jeacle, I.; Carter, C.
  • Should Uber and Lyft keep passengers ratings a secret?
    Kerr, D.
  • The sharing economy: issues facing platforms, participants, and regulators
    Koopman, C.; Mitchell, M.D.; Thierer, A.D.
  • Evaluative infrastructures: accounting for platform organization
    Kornberger, M.; Pflueger, D.; Mouritsen, J.
  • The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities
    Kozinets, R.V.
  • Says who? Epistemic authority effects in social judgment
    Kruglanski, A.W.; Raviv, A.; Bar-Tal, D.; Raviv, A.; Sharvit, K.; Ellis, S.; Bar, R.; Pierro, A.; Mannetti, L.
  • Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com
    Lewis, K.; Kaufman, J.; Gonzalez, M.; Wimmer, A.; Christakis, N.
  • Be a ‘superhost’: the importance of badge systems for peer-to-peer rental accommodations
    Liang, S.; Schuckert, M.; Law, R.; Chen, C.C.
  • Knock, knock. who’s there? The imagined audience
    Litt, E.
  • Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews
    Lo Iacono, V.; Symonds, P.; Brown, D.H.
  • The SEC’s retail investor 2.0: interactive data and the rise of calculative accountability
    Lowe, A.; Locke, J.; Lymer, A.
  • Business research in virtual worlds: possibilities and practicalities
    MacKenzie, K.; Buckby, S.; Irvine, H.
  • I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience
    Marwick, A.E.; Boyd, D.
  • Promotional reviews: an empirical investigation of online review manipulation
    Mayzlin, D.; Dover, Y.; Chevalier, J.
  • Understanding why clients post negative reviews online
    Mazereeuw, A.
  • Performance measurement in global governance: ranking and the politics of variability
    Mehrpouya, A.; Samiolo, R.
  • A ‘democratization’ of markets? Online consumer reviews in the restaurant industry
    Mellet, K.; Beauvisage, T.; Beuscart, J.S.; Trespeuch, M.
  • The limits of accountability
    Messner, M.
  • ‘Accountability’: an ever-expanding concept?
    Mulgan, R.
  • NGO accountability: a conceptual framework
    Najam, A.
  • From functional to social accountability: transforming the accountability relationship between funders and non-governmental development organisations
    O’Dwyer, B.; Unerman, J.
  • The paradox of greater NGO accountability: a case study of Amnesty Ireland
    O’Dwyer, B.; Unerman, J.
  • Airbnb: the future of networked hospitality businesses
    Oskam, J.; Boswijk, A.
  • Corporate governance and impression management in annual results press releases
    Osma, B.G.; Guillamón-Saorín, E.
  • Inefficient hiring in entry-level labor markets
    Pallais, A.
  • Beyond privacy: articulating the broader harms of pervasive mass surveillance
    Parsons, C.
  • Will auditors take over the world? Program, technique and the verification of everything
    Pentland, B.T.
  • Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality
    Pollock, N.; D’Adderio, L.
  • The sharing economy (consumer intelligence series)
  • Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system
    Resnick, P.; Zeckhauser, R.
  • The possibilities of accountability
    Roberts, J.
  • Trust and control in Anglo-American systems of corporate governance: the individualizing and socializing effects of processes of accountability
    Roberts, J.
  • The power of the ‘imaginary’ in disciplinary processes
    Roberts, J.
  • No one is perfect: the limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability
    Roberts, J.
  • Uber Anxiety: when your car service is judging you back
    Roose, K.
  • Reconfiguring relations of accountability: materialization of social media in the travel sector
    Scott, S.V.; Orlikowski, W.J.
  • Ethics and accountability: from the for-itself to the for-the-other
    Shearer, T.
  • Social cooling
    Shep, T.
  • Coercive accountability
    Shore, C.; Wright, S.; Strathern, M.
  • Impression management, myth creation and fabrication in private social and environmental reporting: Insights from Erving Goffman
    Solomon, J.F.; Solomon, A.; Joseph, N.L.; Norton, S.D.
  • China’s weibo: is faster different?
    Sullivan, J.
  • Online word-of-mouth (or mouse): an exploration of its antecedents and consequences
    Sun, T.; Youn, S.; Wu, G.; Kuntaraporn, M.
  • Peer-to-peer businesses and the sharing (collaborative) economy: overview, economic effects and regulatory issues
    Sundararajan, A.
  • Digital matching firms: a new definition in the sharing economy space
    Telles, R.
  • Price determinants on Airbnb: how reputation pays off in the sharing economy
    Teubner, T.; Hawlitschek, F.; Dann, D.
  • The everyday accountant and researching his reality
    Tomkins, C.; Groves, R.
  • Australian Uber drivers say the company is manipulating their ratings to boost its fees
    Tucker, H.
  • Grooming, gossip, Facebook and MySpace: what can we learn about these sites from those who won’t assimilate?
    Tufekci, Z.
  • Guess who’s getting some pretty awful reviews: user review sites
    Tuttle, B.
  • Driver deactivation policy – US only
  • The fact of fiction in organisational ethnography
    Van Maanen, J.
  • Price determinants of sharing economy based accommodation rental: a study of listings from 33 cities on Airbnb.com
    Wang, D.; Nicolau, J.
  • Anonymity, social image, and the competition for volunteers: a case study of the online market for reviews
    Wang, Z.
  • Airbnb raises over $100 million as it touts strong growth
    Winkler, R.
  • User-generated brands and social media: couchsurfing and Airbnb
    Yannopoulou, N.; Moufahim, M.; Bian, X.
  • A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average
    Zervas, G.; Proserpio, D.; Byers, J.
  • When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews
    Zhang, J.Q.; Craciun, G.; Shin, D.
  • Putting consumers to work: ‘co-creation’ and new marketing govern-mentality
    Zwick, D.; Bonsu, S.K.; Darmody, A.
  • Airdna data service
  • Airbnb profits to top $3 billion by 2020
    Gallagher, L.
  • The intersecting roles of consumer and producer: a critical perspective on co-production, co-creation and prosumption
    Humphreys, A.; Grayson, K.
  • Production, consumption, prosumption: the nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’
    Ritzer, G.; Jurgenson, N.
  • Online reviews
    Smith, A.; Anderson., M.
  • Creating ‘value’ beyond the point of production: branding, financialization and market capitalization
    Willmott, H.