Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Coyle (2008)
Exploring the Meaning of ‘Dissatisfaction’ with Health Care: The Importance of ‘Personal Identity Threat’Sociology of Health and Illness, 21
B. Liang (2000)
Risks of reporting sentinel events.Health affairs, 19 5
H. Beckman, K. Markakis, A. Suchman, R. Frankel (1994)
The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions.Archives of internal medicine, 154 12
L. Allen, E. Creer, M. Leggitt (2000)
Developing a patient complaint tracking system to improve performance.The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 26 4
Ross Wilson, W. Runciman, R. Gibberd, B. Harrison, Liza Newby, J. Hamilton (1995)
The Quality in Australian Health Care StudyMedical Journal of Australia, 163
L. Mulcahy (2003)
Disputing Doctors: The Socio-legal Dynamics of Complaints about Medical Care
C. Vincent, M. Young, Angela Phillips (1994)
Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal actionThe Lancet, 343
D. Studdert, Eric Thomas, Helen Burstin, Brett Zbar, E. Orav, T. Brennan (2000)
Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado.Medical care, 38 3
V. Entwistle, J. Andrew, M. Emslie, K. Walker, C. Dorrian, V. Angus, A. Conniff (2003)
Public opinion on systems for feeding back views to the National Health ServiceQuality and Safety in Health Care, 12
J. Allsop, L. Mulcahy (1995)
Dealing with clinical complaints.Quality in Health Care, 4
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the analysis of complaints lodged by patients and how the complainants' letters are handled by health boards and clinicians. Design/methodology/approach – A retrospective analysis of patients' complaints lodged with an independent voluntary citizens' association in Milan and, at the same time, against the hospital administration offices or the consultants and responses returned by the hospitals in reply to the patients. The authors assessed: the reasons for the complaints according to the citizen; the nature of the complaint according to a medical expert revue; and the handling of the complaint process by managers. Findings – For 83 of 151 people (55 per cent), the reason was compensation for injury or pain. According to the medical review, in 54 cases (35.7 per cent), the main themes emerging were mainly “perceived” poor quality of care. Together, or alone, were problems of “technical” quality of care. A total of 94 complaints (62.2 per cent) had been dealt with by the Health Boards, but 48 cases (31.7 per cent) were dealt with by the legal office or the insurance company who replied without showing evidence that they had discussed events with clinicians. Many times the managers did not undertake a systematic investigation, leaving complainants dissatisfied with the process and the outcome. Originality/value – This paper is the first to report the results of an assessment process of complaints lodged via an independent citizens' association in Italy.
Clinical Governance An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 23, 2007
Keywords: Complaints; Quality; Health services; Legal action; Italy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.