Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Whittington (2009)
Best Practice in Managing Risk: Principles and Evidence for Best Practice in the Assessment and Management of Risk to Self and Others in Mental Health Services
(The) Princess Royal Trust for Carers
The Triangle of Care – Carers Included: A Best Practice Guide in Acute Mental Health Care
R. Fleming (2010)
Equity and Excellence: liberating the NHS
C. Hawley, B. Littlechild, T. Sivakumaran, H. Sender, T. Gale, K. Wilson (2006)
Structure and content of risk assessment proformas in mental healthcareJournal of Mental Health, 15
Department of Health
Refocusing the Care Programme Approach; Policy and Positive Practice Guidance
N. Higgins, David Watts, J. Bindman, M. Slade, G. Thornicroft (2005)
Assessing violence risk in general adult psychiatryPsychiatric Bulletin, 29
NHS Litigation Authority
CNST Mental Health and Learning Disability Risk Management Standards
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to improve compliance with clinical risk procedures across a United Kingdom based mental health trust. Design/methodology/approach – A cross‐sectional audit was carried out in April 2010. In total, 70 Risk Assessment Proformas (RAPS) were measured against an agreed “gold‐standard”. The standards were a combination of Department of Health recommendations as well as the current Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (HPFT) policy on clinical risk assessment. Findings – Only 53 (out of a possible 70) RAPS were completed. The acute and community psychiatric service stream samples on the whole provided more information within their RAPS than other parts of the service. There were overall low levels of documentation regarding service user and carer involvement. Practical implications – To strengthen the clinical management of risk (and thus reduce harm) in mental health settings a systematic approach to risk assessment should be present. This involves clinicians working in partnership with both service users and carers. Based on the results, more needs to be done to actively involve carers and the service user in formulating the risk management plan. Not only will this promote positive risk management within the organization it will also enable individual “recovery”. Originality/value – By auditing the organizational processes that underpin the management of risk, deficiencies in clinical care can be identified. Mental Health Trusts can promote positive risk management within their organization by engaging service users and their carers in managing risk.
Clinical Governance An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 9, 2011
Keywords: Risk management; Auditing; Mental health; Suicide; Violence; Health services; United Kingdom
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.