Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Clinical governance, education and learning to manage health information

Clinical governance, education and learning to manage health information Purpose – This paper aims to suggest that the concept of clinical governance goes beyond a bureaucratic accountability structure and can be viewed as a negotiated balance between imperfectly aligned and sometimes conflicting goals within a complex adaptive system. On this view, the information system cannot be separated conceptually from the system of governance it supports or the people whose work it facilitates or hinders. Design/methodology/approach – The study, located within the English National Health Service (NHS) between 1999 and 2005, is case study based using a multi method approach to data collection within two primary care organisations (PCOs). The research strategy is conducted within a social constructionist ontological perspective. Findings – The findings reflect the following broad‐based themes: mutual adjustment of a plurality of stakeholder perceptions, preferences and priorities; the development of information and communication systems, empowered by informatics; an emphasis on education and training to build capacity and capability. Research limitations/implications – Limitations of case study methodology include a tendency to provide selected accounts. These are potentially biased and risk trivialising findings. Rooted in specific context, their generalisability to other contexts is limited by the extent to which contexts are similar. Reasonable attempts were made to minimise any bias. The diversity of data collection methods used in the study was an attempt to counterbalance the limitations highlighted in one method by strength from alternative techniques. Practical implications – The paper makes recommendations in two key governance areas: education and learning to manage health information. In practice, the lessons learned provide opportunities to inform future approaches to health informatics educational programmes. Originality/value – With regard to topicality, it is suggested that many of the developmental issues highlighted during the establishment of quality improvement programmes within primary care organisations (PCGs/PCTs) are relevant in the light of current NHS reforms and move towards commissioning consortia. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Clinical Governance: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

Clinical governance, education and learning to manage health information

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/clinical-governance-education-and-learning-to-manage-health-0QMu7Wdiq9
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1477-7274
DOI
10.1108/14777271111175378
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to suggest that the concept of clinical governance goes beyond a bureaucratic accountability structure and can be viewed as a negotiated balance between imperfectly aligned and sometimes conflicting goals within a complex adaptive system. On this view, the information system cannot be separated conceptually from the system of governance it supports or the people whose work it facilitates or hinders. Design/methodology/approach – The study, located within the English National Health Service (NHS) between 1999 and 2005, is case study based using a multi method approach to data collection within two primary care organisations (PCOs). The research strategy is conducted within a social constructionist ontological perspective. Findings – The findings reflect the following broad‐based themes: mutual adjustment of a plurality of stakeholder perceptions, preferences and priorities; the development of information and communication systems, empowered by informatics; an emphasis on education and training to build capacity and capability. Research limitations/implications – Limitations of case study methodology include a tendency to provide selected accounts. These are potentially biased and risk trivialising findings. Rooted in specific context, their generalisability to other contexts is limited by the extent to which contexts are similar. Reasonable attempts were made to minimise any bias. The diversity of data collection methods used in the study was an attempt to counterbalance the limitations highlighted in one method by strength from alternative techniques. Practical implications – The paper makes recommendations in two key governance areas: education and learning to manage health information. In practice, the lessons learned provide opportunities to inform future approaches to health informatics educational programmes. Originality/value – With regard to topicality, it is suggested that many of the developmental issues highlighted during the establishment of quality improvement programmes within primary care organisations (PCGs/PCTs) are relevant in the light of current NHS reforms and move towards commissioning consortia.

Journal

Clinical Governance: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Oct 18, 2011

Keywords: Clinical governance; Health informatics; Quality improvement; Education; Complex adaptive systems; Health services; United Kingdom

References

  • Complexity theory and organization science
    Anderson, P.
  • Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology
    Atkinson, R.L.; Atkinson, R.C.; Smith, E.E.; Bem, D.J.; Nolen‐Hoesema, S.
  • Reforming primary care in England – again. Plans for improving the quality of care
    Baker, R.
  • Principles of quality improvement. Part one – defining quality
    Baker, R.
  • Principles and models for quality improvement
    Baker, R.; Grol, R.
  • A primer on leading the improvement of systems
    Berwick, D.
  • Developing and testing changes in delivery of care
    Berwick, D.
  • Quality management in the NHS; the doctor's role
    Berwick, D.; Enthoven, A.; Bunker, J.
  • Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care
    Berwick, D.M.
  • Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning
    Brookfield, S.D.
  • Complexity and Post‐modernism
    Cilliers, P.
  • Clinical governance: striking a balance between checking and trusting
    Davies, H.T.; Mannion, R.
  • The New NHS. Modern, Dependable, Cm3807
    Department of Health
  • A First Class Service. Quality in the New NHS HSC(98)113
    Department of Health
  • Clinical Governance: quality in the new NHS, HSC (99) 065
    Department of Health
  • Making Information Count: A Human Resources Strategy for Health Informatics Professionals
    Department of Health
  • NHS Next Stage Review
    Department of Health
  • Clinical governance: quality improvement as a duty not a choice
    Donaldson, L.J.
  • What is clinical governance? A workable definition
    Dunning, M.; Agnes, P.
  • Identification of the critical success factors involved in the implementation of clinical governance arrangements within primary care
    Ellis, B.