Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J.L. Ramseur
Voluntary Carbon Offsets: Overview and Assessment
D. Farber (2007)
Adapting to Climate Change: Who Should Pay?Environmental Law & Policy eJournal
Jonathan Ramseur (2007)
Voluntary Carbon Offsets: Overview and Assessment [November 7, 2007]
J. Ginsberg, P. Bloom (2004)
Choosing the Right Green Marketing StrategyMIT Sloan Management Review, 46
G. Libecap (2009)
The Tragedy of the Commons: Property Rights and Markets as Solutions to Resource and Environmental ProblemsEnvironmental Economics
European Commission Directorate General for Environment
Review of EU Emissions Trading Scheme
J. Delingpole
Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’?
J. Bushnell, Howard Chong, E. Mansur (2009)
Profiting from Regulation: An Event Study of the EU Carbon MarketCSR & Management Practice eJournal
J. Hovi, B. Holtsmark
Cap‐and‐trade or carbon taxes? The feasibility of enforcement and the effects of non‐compliance
Chad Nehrt (1998)
Maintainability of First Mover Advantages When Environmental Regulations Differ Between CountriesAcademy of Management Review, 23
M. Kissel
Climate change quagmire
(2009)
Consuming nations should pay for carbon dioxide emissions , not manufacturing countries "
(2008)
Responsible green marketing", paper presented at the American Conference Institutes Regulator Summit for Advertisers and Marketers
M. Hoffert, K. Caldeira, G. Benford, D. Criswell, C. Green, H. Herzog, Atul Jain, H. Kheshgi, K. Lackner, JOHN Lewis, H. Lightfoot, W. Manheimer, J. Mankins, M. Mauel, L. Perkins, M. Schlesinger, T. Volk, TomM. Wigley (2002)
Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse PlanetScience, 298
S. Barrett
Kyoto and beyond: alternative approaches to global warming – climate treaties and breakthrough technologies
Burkard Eberlein, Dirk Matten (2009)
Business Responses to Climate Change Regulation in Canada and Germany: Lessons for MNCs from Emerging EconomiesJournal of Business Ethics, 86
European Communities
EU Action Against Climate Change: The EU Emissions Trading Scheme
M.J. Polonsky, C. Jevons
Global branding and CSR‐ dealing with three types of complexity
G. MacKerron, C. Egerton, Christine Gaskell, Aimie Parpia, S. Mourato (2009)
Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high-)flying young adults in the UKEnergy Policy, 37
M. Levine, Jennifer Forrence (1990)
Regulatory Capture, Public Interest, and the Public Agenda: Toward a SynthesisJournal of Law Economics & Organization, 6
J. Mathews (2008)
How carbon credits could drive the emergence of renewable energiesEnergy Policy, 36
R. Shapiro (2007)
The Carbon Tax: An Alternative to Carbon Trading
M. Polonsky, Leslie Carlson, Andrea Prothero, D. Kapelianis (2002)
A cross-cultural examination of the environmental information on packaging: Implications for advertisers, 12
E. Roll, P. Sweezy, Joan Robinson (1943)
The Theory of Capitalist DevelopmentYale Law Journal, 52
M. Polonsky, Stacy Grau, Romana Garma (2009)
Exploring US Consumers Understanding of Carbon Offsets
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission
Carbon Claims and the Trade Practices Act
J. Hovi, Bjart Holtsmark (2005)
Cap-and-trade or carbon taxes? The feasibility of enforcement and the effects of non-complianceInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 6
A. Engels (2009)
The European Emissions Trading Scheme: An exploratory study of how companies learn to account for carbon☆Accounting Organizations and Society, 34
Renato Orsato (2006)
Competitive Environmental Strategies: When Does it Pay to Be Green?California Management Review, 48
Sheila Olmstead, Robert Stavins (2006)
An International Policy Architecture for the Post-Kyoto EraThe American Economic Review, 96
(2007)
A strategic approach to climate
A. Crane (2000)
Facing the backlash: green marketing and strategic reorientation in the 1990sJournal of Strategic Marketing, 8
(2010)
Climate change quagmire", The Wall Street Journal, No.March, pp.A17
Morgan Miles, J. Covin (2000)
Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational, Competitive, and Financial AdvantageJournal of Business Ethics, 23
G. Eskeland, A. Harrison (1997)
Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven HypothesisNBER Working Paper Series
K. Carr
$4.5 Billion Clean Energy Initiative
T. Ekholm, T. Ekholm, S. Soimakallio, S. Moltmann, N. Höhne, S. Syri, I. Savolainen (2010)
Effort sharing in ambitious, global climate change mitigation scenariosEnergy Policy, 38
H. Weidner, Lutz Mez (2008)
German Climate Change PolicyThe Journal of Environment & Development, 17
Kenneth Chilton (2000)
Reengineering U.S. environmental protectionBusiness Horizons, 43
Lois Mohr, Dogan Eroglu, P. Ellen (1998)
The Development and Testing of a Measure of Skepticism Toward Environmental Claims in Marketers' CommunicationsJournal of Consumer Affairs, 32
(2009)
Climate change alliance crumbles as accord is labelled a ‘great failure’
S. Barrett (2006)
Climate Treaties and "Breakthrough" TechnologiesThe American Economic Review, 96
A. Millard‐Ball, L. Ortolano (2010)
Constructing carbon offsets: The obstacles to quantifying emission reductionsEnergy Policy, 38
C. Egenhofer (2007)
The Making of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme:: Status, Prospects and Implications for BusinessEuropean Management Journal, 25
(2010)
Steelmakers plead case to house lawmakers – chief executives lobby for spending on infrastructure projects, aim to dodge more stringent climate regulations
J. Button (2008)
CARBON: COMMODITY OR CURRENCY? THE CASE FOR AN INTERNATIONAL CARBON MARKET BASED ON THE CURRENCY MODEL
M. Polonsky, Colin Jevons (2009)
Global branding and strategic CSR: An overview of three types of complexityInternational Marketing Review, 26
B. Andrew (2008)
Market failure, government failure and externalities in climate change mitigation: The case for a carbon taxPublic Administration and Development, 28
J. Wiener (2002)
Designing Global Climate Regulation
D. Botkin, H. Saxe, M. Araújo, R. Betts, R. Bradshaw, T. Cedhagen, P. Chesson, T. Dawson, J. Etterson, D. Faith, S. Ferrier, A. Guisan, A. Hansen, D. Hilbert, C. Loehle, C. Margules, M. New, M. Sobel, David Stockwell (2007)
Forecasting the Effects of Global Warming on Biodiversity, 57
Morgan Miles, Linda Munilla, G. Russell (1997)
Marketing and environmental registration/certification: What industrial marketers should understand about ISO 14000Industrial Marketing Management, 26
M. Miranda (2009)
Reconciling the duplicity of consumer attitudes to carbon footprintsThe International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 19
C. Rosen (2001)
Environmental Strategy and Competitive Advantage: An IntroductionCalifornia Management Review, 43
A. Kollmuss, Helge Tricorona, Clifford Polycarp (2008)
Making Sense of the Voluntary Carbon Market: A Comparison of Carbon Offset Standards.
(2009)
$4.5 Billion Clean Energy Initiative, Governmental press release May 12, available at: www.minister.innovation.gov.au/Carr/Pages/45BILLIONCLEANENERGYINI TIATIVE.aspx
J.T. Rosch
Responsible green marketing
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overarching conceptual decision model that delineates the major issues and decisions associated with carbon regulations that will allow executives to better understand the potential regulatory schemes and implications that may be imposed in the near future. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use the extant literature as the foundation to develop a conceptual model of the decisions pertaining to climate change regulation that face business executives today. Findings – This paper suggests four major categories of issues that must be addressed in any climate change regulatory scheme. These include: “scope” – will carbon emission management systems be global or regional; “who pays” – will the consumer or will the supply chain be responsible for the cost of their emissions; “market or compliance‐based mechanisms” – will the CO 2 emissions system be market‐based or a compliance‐based regulatory system; and “criteria” – how can credence of the remedy be established – what is necessary for a business initiative to qualify for as a creditable carbon offset? Research limitations/implications – This paper offers a framework that categories the fundamental decisions that must be made in any climate change regulation. This framework may be useful in advancing research into any of the four categories of decisions and their implications on commerce and the environment. This paper is designed to be managerially useful and in that way does limit its ability to specifically advance many dimensions of research. Practical implications – The paper offers executives for a simple model of the decisions that must be made to craft an effective climate change regulatory scheme. In addition, it suggests how these decisions may create exploitable economic opportunities for innovative and proactive firms. Originality/value – This paper adds value to the debate by clarifying the decisions that must be addressed in any climate change regulation scheme.
European Business Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 28, 2011
Keywords: Climate change; Climate change regulations; Climate change reparation scheme; Environmental regulations
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.