Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Chinese writing development of Kindergarten students over 12 months

Chinese writing development of Kindergarten students over 12 months The purpose of this paper is to examine the writing development of Hong Kong kindergarten students over 12 months. They attended 18 kindergartens territory-wide and were followed from June 2002 to June 2003 for the collection of three waves of teacher-rated data at six-month intervals.Design/methodology/approachFirst, the construct validity of the translated and culturally adapted version of Morrow’s (2012) checklist which assesses writing development was confirmed, considering that the students attended Hong Kong kindergartens who wrote in the Chinese language. The multilevel analysis, which employed corrected measures captured through Wolfe and Chiu’s (1999a, 1999b) five-step Rasch scaling method for a common frame of reference, estimated the effects of the factors, namely, student age, gender, class level and schools.FindingsThe children’s progress over the second six months was also apparently much smaller than the first SIX months for this cohort. The dramatic slow-down in the second six-month period for both cohorts might be partly attributed to the peculiar arrangement of schooling at that time.Research limitations/implicationsThe recommendation from this study is that random sampling and student test scores on writing need to be taken for the identification of the general trend of young children’s writing development in Hong Kong, as well as other Chinese communities alike.Originality/valueThe profile of the student’s emergent writing development at each six-month follow-up and over the 12 months was explored. Differences between the groups based on age, gender, class level and school in terms of student writing development on average were statistically significant. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Comparative Education and Development Emerald Publishing

Chinese writing development of Kindergarten students over 12 months

Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/chinese-writing-development-of-kindergarten-students-over-12-months-0DMC5vZ4oi

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2396-7404
DOI
10.1108/ijced-05-2019-0032
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the writing development of Hong Kong kindergarten students over 12 months. They attended 18 kindergartens territory-wide and were followed from June 2002 to June 2003 for the collection of three waves of teacher-rated data at six-month intervals.Design/methodology/approachFirst, the construct validity of the translated and culturally adapted version of Morrow’s (2012) checklist which assesses writing development was confirmed, considering that the students attended Hong Kong kindergartens who wrote in the Chinese language. The multilevel analysis, which employed corrected measures captured through Wolfe and Chiu’s (1999a, 1999b) five-step Rasch scaling method for a common frame of reference, estimated the effects of the factors, namely, student age, gender, class level and schools.FindingsThe children’s progress over the second six months was also apparently much smaller than the first SIX months for this cohort. The dramatic slow-down in the second six-month period for both cohorts might be partly attributed to the peculiar arrangement of schooling at that time.Research limitations/implicationsThe recommendation from this study is that random sampling and student test scores on writing need to be taken for the identification of the general trend of young children’s writing development in Hong Kong, as well as other Chinese communities alike.Originality/valueThe profile of the student’s emergent writing development at each six-month follow-up and over the 12 months was explored. Differences between the groups based on age, gender, class level and school in terms of student writing development on average were statistically significant.

Journal

International Journal of Comparative Education and Development – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 31, 2019

Keywords: Hong Kong; Longitudinal study; Kindergarten students; Writing literacy

References

  • Early writing development: Kindergarten teachers’ beliefs about emergent writing in Qatari preschool settings
    Al-Maadadi, F.; Ihmeideh, F.
  • Professionals talking about young children’s drawing: the impact of their beliefs on practice
    Anning, A.
  • Investigating the unit of study approach as a way to teach writing to early childhood education preservice teachers
    Batchelor, K.; Morgan, D.; Kidder-Brown, M.; Zimmerman, B.
  • What’s in a name? Children’s name writing and literacy acquisition
    Bloodgood, J.W.
  • Levels of comparison in educational studies: different insights from different literatures and the value of multiple analyses
    Bray, M.; Thomas, R.M.
  • Developmental trend of Chinese preschool children in drawing and writing
    Chan, L.; Louie, L.
  • Chinese preschool children’s literacy development: from emergent to conventional writing
    Chan, L.; Cheng, Z.J.; Chan, L.F.
  • Development in early literacy skills during the pre-kindergarten year in Head Start: relations between growth in children’s writing and understanding of letters
    Diamond, K.E.; Gerde, H.K.; Powell, D.R.
  • Name writing and letter knowledge in preschoolers: incongruities in skills and the usefulness of name writing as a developmental indicator
    Drouin, M.; Harmon, J.
  • The impact of teachers’ beliefs on the literacy experiences of young children: a New Zealand perspective
    Foote, L.; Smith, J.; Ellis, F.
  • Reliability and validity of the writing resources and interactions in teaching environments (WRITE) for preschool classrooms
    Gerde, H.K.; Bingham, G.E.; Pendergast, M.L.
  • Writing in early childhood classrooms: guidance for best practices
    Gerde, H.K.; Bingham, G.E.; Wasik, B.A.
  • Multilevel statistical models
    Goldstein, H.
  • Multilevel multivariate modelling of childhood growth, numbers of growth measurements, and adult characteristics
    Goldstein, H.; Kounali, D.
  • Examining the effects of preschool writing instruction on emergent literacy skills: a systematic review of the literature
    Hall, A.; Simpson, A.; Guo, Y.; Wang, S.
  • Head start teachers’ beliefs about language and literacy instruction
    Hindman, A.H.; Wasik, B.A.
  • Jordanian student teachers’ perceptions of teaching writing in kindergartens during their field training experience
    Ihmeideh, F.; Al-Basheer, A.; Al-Momani, I.
  • How is emergent writing based on drawing? Analyses of children’s products and their sorting by children and mothers
    Levin, I.; Bus, A.G.
  • Writing starts with own name writing: from scribbling to conventional spelling in Israeli and Dutch children
    Levin, I.; Both-De Vries, A.; Aram, D.; Bus, A.
  • Teachers’ orientations towards writing
    McCarthey, S.J.; Mkhize, D.
  • Learning to be literate: a comparison of five urban early childhood programs
    McGill-Franzen, A.; Lanford, C.; Adams, E.
  • Predictors of success with writing in the first year of school
    Mackenzie, N.; Hemmings, B.
  • Do university teachers become more effective with experience? A multiple growth model of students’ evaluations of teaching over 13 years
    Marsh, H.W.
  • Rasch measurement of literacy development over 12 months of kindergarten students from Hong Kong
    Mok, M.M.C.; Lim, A.S.E.; Lam, H.M.Y.
  • Preparing preservice teachers to become teachers of writing: a 20-Year review of the research literature
    Morgan, D.; Pytash, K.
  • Literacy knowledge in practice: contexts of participation for young writers and readers
    Neuman, S.B.; Roskos, K.
  • Emergent writing: the impact of structured peer interaction
    Nixon, J.; Topping, K.
  • Supporting young children’s oral language and writing development: teachers’ and early childhood educators’ goals and practices
    Peterson, S.S.; McIntyre, L.J.; Forsyth, D.
  • Help me where I am: scaffolding writing in preschool classrooms
    Quinn, M.F.; Gerde, H.K.; Bingham, G.E.
  • A user’s guide to MLwiN
    Rasbash, J.; Steele, F.; Browne, W.J.; Goldstein, H.
  • The mind is not a black box: children’s ideas about the writing process
    Scheuer, N.; de la Cruz, M.; Pozo, J.I.; Neira, S.
  • Relation between phonological development and writing initial learning in different socio-educational settings
    Silva, A.C.F.; Cordeiro, A.A.A.; Queiroga, B.A.M.; Rosal, A.G.C.; Carvalho, E.A.; Roazzi, A.
  • Research directions: translation from emergent to conventional writing
    Sulzby, E.
  • Improving young children’s writing: the influence of story structure on kindergarteners’ writing complexity
    Watanabe, L.M.; Hall-Kenyon, K.M.
  • Child development and emergent literacy
    Whitehurst, G.; Lonigan, C.
  • Measuring pretest-posttest change with a Rasch rating scale model
    Wolfe, E.W.; Chiu, C.W.T.
  • Measuring change across multiple occasions using the Rasch rating scale model
    Wolfe, E.W.; Chiu, C.W.T.
  • Time 1 to time 2 (pre-test to post-test) comparison: racking and stacking
    Wright, B.D.
  • Rasch models overview
    Wright, B.D.; Mok, M.M.C.
  • Children’s graphical representations and emergent writing: evidence from children’s drawings
    Wu, L.
  • Different texts, different emergent writing forms
    Zecker, L.
  • Early childhood education in Hong Kong and its challenges
    Chan, L.K.S.; Chan, L.
  • How drawing can support writing acquisition: text construction in early writing from a Vygotskian perspective
    Mackenzie, N.M.; Veresov, N.
  • Validation of scores from self-learning scales for primary students using true-score and Rasch measurement methods
    Mok, M.M.C.