Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Discusses the arguments for and against the trend of charging forinterlibrary loans. Considers the costs of interlending, sources ofinformation, the charging situation in the United Kingdom, Europe,former USSR, USA and Canada, and Australia, as well as the reasons fornot charging transaction size, political reasons, income retentionuseand moral objection. Concludes that the trend towards charging is likelyto widen the gap between those who can afford to pay for documents andthose who cant, to the detriment of library cooperation.
Interlending & Document Supply – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.