Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Connell, D. Farrington (1996)
Bullying among incarcerated young offenders: developing an interview schedule and some preliminary resultsJournal of adolescence, 19 1
Demetra Andrews, J. Bonta, R. Hoge (1990)
Classification for Effective RehabilitationCriminal Justice and Behavior, 17
P. Cohen (1996)
Childhood Risks for Young Adult Symptoms of Personality Disorder: Method and Substance.Multivariate behavioral research, 31 1
Brent Paterline, D. Petersen (1999)
Structural and social psychological determinants of prisonizationJournal of Criminal Justice, 27
L. Huesmann (1998)
The role of social information processing and cognitive schema in the acquisition and maintenance of habitual aggressive behavior
D. Farrington (1993)
Understanding and Preventing BullyingCrime and Justice, 17
I. Sekol, D. Farrington (2016)
Personal characteristics of bullying victims in residential care for youthJournal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 8
K. Kumpulainen (2000)
Bullying at school
J. Ireland (2013)
Bullying among prisoners: the need for innovation
J. Ireland (2012)
Treatment approaches for violence and aggression: essential content components
I. Sekol, D. Farrington (2016)
Psychological and background correlates of bullying in adolescent residential careJournal of Social Work, 16
J. Ireland (2012)
Understanding bullying among younger prisoners: recent research and introducing the Multifactor Model of Bullying in Secure Settings, 24
Wesley Jennings, B. Fox, D. Farrington (2014)
Inked into Crime? An Examination of the Causal Relationship between Tattoos and Life-Course Offending among Males from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent DevelopmentJournal of Criminal Justice, 42
K. Power, G. Dyson, E. Wozniak (1997)
Bullying Among Scottish Young Offenders: Inmates' Self‐Reported Attitudes and BehaviourJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7
J. Mccord, D. West, D. Farrington (1977)
The Delinquent Way Of Life
J. Ireland, P. Qualter (2008)
Bullying and social and emotional loneliness in a sample of adult male prisoners.International journal of law and psychiatry, 31 1
I. Shields, David Simourd (1991)
Predicting Predatory Behavior in a Population of Incarcerated Young OffendersCriminal Justice and Behavior, 18
Polly Turner, J. Ireland (2010)
Do personality characteristics and beliefs predict intra-group bullying between prisoners?Aggressive behavior, 36 4
A. Connell, D. Farrington (1997)
The reliability and validity of resident, staff and peer reports of bullying in young offender institutionsPsychology Crime & Law, 3
J. Archer, Natalie Southall (2009)
Does cost-benefit analysis or self-control predict involvement in bullying behavior by male prisoners?Aggressive behavior, 35 1
D. Olweus (1993)
Bullying at schoolPromotion & Education, 1
(1976)
The exploitation matrix in a juvenile institution
J. Ireland (2011)
The Importance of Coping, Threat Appraisal, and Beliefs in Understanding and Responding to Fear of Victimization: Applications to a Male Prisoner SampleLaw and Human Behavior, 35
(1994)
Self-reported bullying among imprisoned young offenders
J. Ireland (2012)
Conducting individualised theory-driven assessments of violent offenders
Maria Ttofi, D. Farrington, F. Lösel, R. Loeber (2011)
The predictive efficiency of school bullying versus later offending: a systematic/meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies.Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH, 21 2
Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to investigate the characteristics of bullies and victims in Canadian institutions for young offenders. The second aim is to investigate to what extent it is possible to develop risk scores that can predict who will become a bully or a victim. Design/methodology/approach– In total, 185 male young offenders aged 16-19 in nine Ontario facilities were individually interviewed about their bullying and victimization, and two standardized inventories were completed. Findings– Compared with non-bullies, bullies had spent longer in their present facility, had been bullies in a previous facility, had more previous custodial sentences, had been suspended or expelled at school, and expressed aggressive attitudes. Compared with non-victims, victims were socially isolated in custody, had failed a grade in school, had been committed to a psychiatric hospital, had been victims in a previous facility, had fewer previous custodial sentences, and were less likely to express aggressive attitudes. Practical implications– Risk/needs assessment instruments should be developed to identify likely bullies and victims and guide interventions to prevent bullying in young offender institutions. Originality/value– This paper shows that bullies and victims can be accurately identified based on risk factors including aggressive attitudes.
Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 11, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.