Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Capacity and competence: limitations on choice and action

Capacity and competence: limitations on choice and action Purpose – The terms capacity and competence are often used interchangeably, but are actually distinct. This aim of this paper is to clarify the application of these terms, and to illustrate some of the practical benefits of distinguishing them. Design/methodology/approach – The concepts of capacity and competence are discussed in relation to restrictions that are placed on choice and action, respectively, when these qualities are judged to be absent. The paper explores the distinction between these two concepts in relation to their legal status, assessment, and scope. Findings – Mental capacity refers to the ability to make decisions, while competence refers to the ability to perform the actions needed to put decisions into effect. Questions of capacity are governed by legislation (in the UK: the Mental Capacity Act (MCA); the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act and the Sexual Offences Act); they apply only to people who can be demonstrated to have a “mental disorder”, and trigger best‐interests decision making and other legal provisions if capacity is assessed as absent. Questions of competence involve a range of formal and informal assessment procedures, and can apply to anyone; they arise where others possess legal powers to control a person's actions. Originality/value – In addition to clarifying the conceptual confusion that exists in this area, the paper also considers some areas of practice where the MCA can be invoked to promote competence, in addition to capacity. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities Emerald Publishing

Capacity and competence: limitations on choice and action

Download PDF
8 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/capacity-and-competence-limitations-on-choice-and-action-iDjCCn708S
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
2044-1282
DOI
10.1108/20441281111187207
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The terms capacity and competence are often used interchangeably, but are actually distinct. This aim of this paper is to clarify the application of these terms, and to illustrate some of the practical benefits of distinguishing them. Design/methodology/approach – The concepts of capacity and competence are discussed in relation to restrictions that are placed on choice and action, respectively, when these qualities are judged to be absent. The paper explores the distinction between these two concepts in relation to their legal status, assessment, and scope. Findings – Mental capacity refers to the ability to make decisions, while competence refers to the ability to perform the actions needed to put decisions into effect. Questions of capacity are governed by legislation (in the UK: the Mental Capacity Act (MCA); the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act and the Sexual Offences Act); they apply only to people who can be demonstrated to have a “mental disorder”, and trigger best‐interests decision making and other legal provisions if capacity is assessed as absent. Questions of competence involve a range of formal and informal assessment procedures, and can apply to anyone; they arise where others possess legal powers to control a person's actions. Originality/value – In addition to clarifying the conceptual confusion that exists in this area, the paper also considers some areas of practice where the MCA can be invoked to promote competence, in addition to capacity.

Journal

Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities – Emerald Publishing

Published: Nov 17, 2011

Keywords: Mental capacity; Competence; Mental Capacity Act; Choice; Action

References

  • Mental capacity: in search of alternative perspectives
    Berghmans, R.; Dickenson, D.; Ter Meulen, R.
  • The conflation of competence and capacity in English medical law: a philosophical critique
    Bielby, P.
  • Findings from a court study of care proceedings involving parents with learning disabilities
    Booth, T.; Booth, W.
  • Assessment of Capacity in Adults: Interim Guidance for Psychologists
    British Psychological Society
  • Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making
    Buchanan, A.E.; Brock, D.W.
  • Prosecuting crimes against older people
    Crown Prosecution Service
  • Mental Capacity Act
    Department of Constitutional Affairs
  • Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice
    Department of Constitutional Affairs
  • Valuing People Now
    Department of Health
  • Disability, facilitated sex and the role of the nurse
    Earle, S.
  • No secrets, safeguarding adults and adult protection
    Fitzgerald, G.
  • Vulnerability of witnesses with learning disabilities: preparing to give evidence against a perpetrator of sexual abuse
    Green, G.
  • Sex, relationships and the law for people with learning disability
    Hall, I.; Yacoub, E.
  • Children Act
    Her Majesties Government
  • Human Rights Act
    Her Majesties Government
  • Youth and Criminal Justice Act
    Her Majesties Government
  • Sexual Offences Act
    Her Majesties Government
  • Electoral Administration Act
    Her Majesties Government
  • May we please have sex tonight? People with learning difficulties pursuing privacy in residential group settings
    Hollomotz, A.; The Speakup Committee
  • Best Interests: Guidance on Determining the Best Interests of Adults Who Lack the Capacity to Make a Decision (or decisions) for Themselves
    Joyce, T.
  • Crimes Against People with Developmental Disabilities: An Overview
    Luckasson, R.
  • The fate of psychotic offenders returned for trial
    McGarry, A.L.
  • An upturn in unfitness to plead? Disability in relation to the trial under the 1991 Act
    Mackay, R.D.; Kearns, G.
  • Adults' capacity to make legal decisions
    Murphy, G.H.; Clare, I.C.H.
  • Crime victims with a developmental disability
    Petersilia, J.R.
  • Citizens with learning disabilities and the right to vote
    Redley, M.