Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Dominique Estampe, S. Lamouri, J. Paris, Sakina Brahim-Djelloul (2013)
A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation modelsInternational Journal of Production Economics, 142
D. Donk (2014)
Supply Chain Networks
Peter Bolstorff, R. Rosenbaum (2007)
Supply chain excellence : a handbook for dramatic improvement using the SCOR model
B. Curtis, W. Hefley, Sally Miller (2002)
The People Capability Maturity Model : guidelines for improving the workforce
Marcello Visconti, C. Cook (1998)
Evolution of a maturity model – critical evaluation and lessons learnedSoftware Quality Journal, 7
A. Lockamy, Kevin McCormack (2004)
The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientationSupply Chain Management, 9
G. Paché, A. Spalanzani (2007)
La gestion des chaines logistiques multi-acteurs : perspectives stratégiques
M. Bitton (1990)
Ecograi : méthode de conception et d'implantation de systèmes de mesure de performances pour organisations industrielles
U. Bititci (1995)
Modelling of performance measurement systems in manufacturing enterprisesInternational Journal of Production Economics, 42
Cmmi Team (2007)
CMMI for Acquisition, Version 1.2
Heriberto Reyes, R. Giachetti (2010)
Using experts to develop a supply chain maturity model in MexicoSupply Chain Management, 15
C. Battista, A. Fumi, L. Scarabotti, Mm Schiraldi (2012)
The Logistic Maturity Model: guidelines for logistic processes continuous improvement
R. Kaplan, D. Norton (1996)
Linking the Balanced Scorecard to StrategyCalifornia Management Review, 39
Cmmi Team (2011)
CMMI for Services, Version 1.2
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study how a general standardized processes assessment capability/maturity model, such as Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), can be combined to a standardized benchmark of logistics processes best practices, such as FD X50-604, to propose a new approach that evaluates logistics processes capability/maturity. Design/methodology/approach – First, an analysis study of CMMI model and X50-604 standard is performed. In order to prove their coherence, a deep comparative analysis of CMMI and X50-604 practices is conducted. As illustration, the paper focuses on a particular application of this approach to evaluate capability/maturity of distribution logistics activities. An industrial case study that aims the validation of this particular application is finally conducted in a furniture company. Findings – The authors estimate that the paper findings provide an operational guide for industrials to evaluate their distribution processes that is a practical, verifiable, repeatable and extensible to other logistics process areas and an interesting opportunity to evolve the standard FD X50-604 regarding CMMI requirements to assess capability/maturity of logistics processes. Originality/value – In general, the few capability/maturity-driven models analyzed in literature present some limits that do not allow their diffusion in the industrial level, especially in logistics. This study proposes a new approach based on standards that provide an operational guide for industrials to evaluate their distribution processes based on capability/maturity concept.
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 12, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.