Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. McHugh, Paul Humphreys, R. Mclvor (2003)
Buyer-Supplier Relationships and Organizational HealthJournal of Supply Chain Management, 39
Thomas Forget (1984)
The rules of the gameBritish Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.), 289
M. Sako
Prices, Quality and Trust
Oliver Williamson (1999)
STRATEGY RESEARCH: GOVERNANCE AND COMPETENCE PERSPECTIVESStrategic Management Journal, 20
R. Fisher, Willliam Ury, Bruce Patton (1981)
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in
J.A. Carlisle, R.C. Parker
Beyond Negotiation
M.R. Leenders, D.L. Blenkhorn
Reverse Marketing
R. Rumelt (2005)
Theory, Strategy, and Entrepreneurship
O. Williamson (1996)
The mechanisms of governance
J.R. Commons
The problem of correlating law, economics and ethics
A. Cox, Chris Lonsdale, J. Sanderson, G. Watson (2004)
Business Relationships for Competitive Advantage
A. Cox, J. Sanderson, G. Watson
Power Regimes
J. Von Neumann, O. Morgenstern
Theories of Games and Economic Behavior
A. Cox
Business Success
A. Cox
Supply Chain Management: A Guide to Best Practice
A. Smith
The Wealth of Nations
M. Christopher
Marketing Logistics
D. Ford, H. Håkansson, J. Johanson (1986)
How Do Companies Interact
R. Fisher, W. Ury
Getting to Yes
W. Dugger (1987)
The Economic Institutions of CapitalismJournal of Economic Issues, 21
H. Håkansson, I. Snehota (1995)
Developing relationships in business networks
R. Lamming, N. Caldwell, D. Harrison, W. Phillips (2001)
Transparency in supply relationships: concept and practiceIEEE Engineering Management Review, 30
O.E. Williamson
Empirical Microeconomics: Another Perspective
A. Cox
Supply Chains, Markets and Power
J.P. Womack, D.T. Jones
Lean Thinking
This paper argues that supply chain management sourcing strategies are unlikely to be implemented successfully by many organisations because of a lack of internal buy‐in and non‐conducive external power regime structures. Furthermore, the paper contends that many of those arguing the case for “win‐win” outcomes from buyer and supplier relationship management fail to properly define or conceptualise what the concept of mutuality means. The paper contends that mutuality and the search for value capture (profitability) are not fully commensurable in business relationships, but that, since “win‐win” is not an absolute but a variable concept, business relationships can be aligned even when unequal exchange and tension exists between buyers and suppliers. The paper also demonstrates that under some circumstances “win‐lose” can be a preferable outcome than “win‐win” for buyers and suppliers managing business relationships.
Supply Chain Management An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 2004
Keywords: Buyer‐seller relationships; Sourcing; Business‐to‐business marketing
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.