Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Burden or opportunity? The role of employees' regulatory focus in shaping the motivational processes of empowering leadership

Burden or opportunity? The role of employees' regulatory focus in shaping the motivational... The potential contradictory impact of empowering leadership may obfuscate its effectiveness. Empowering leadership is characterized not only by increased employees' autonomy but also by additional responsibilities and work demands, which may trigger different motivational processes for employees and lead to different perceptions of job stressors. This research aims to explore such contradictory impacts of empowering leadership on employees' perceived stressors by clarifying the complex motivational processes (intrinsic/extrinsic) experienced by employees when facing empowering leadership, as well as the boundary condition of employees' regulatory focus based on regulatory focus theory and self-determination theory (SDT).Design/methodology/approachThe authors examine the proposed theoretical model using a two-wave survey, with the data being collected from 294 employees working at a hotel in China.FindingsThe results show that both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation mediate the relationship between empowering leadership and employees' perceived stressors and demonstrate the moderating role of an employee's regulatory focus. Specifically, a high promotion focus strengthens the relationship between empowering leadership and intrinsic motivation, while a high prevention focus strengthens the relationship between empowering leadership and extrinsic motivation.Practical implicationsManagers should consider the attributes of front-line service employees (e.g. are they promotion-focused or prevention-focused?) when demonstrating empowering leadership to prevent employees from misinterpreting that leadership as a source of stress.Originality/valueThis research helps to reconcile previously conflicting findings on empowering leadership by clarifying the complex motivational processes behind it. Furthermore, this research adopts a regulatory focus perspective to suggest that the reason why employees respond to their leaders differently is inherently associated with each employee's motivational tendencies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Baltic Journal of Management Emerald Publishing

Burden or opportunity? The role of employees' regulatory focus in shaping the motivational processes of empowering leadership

Li, Liyuan; Zhang, Ying; Zheng, Xiaoming
Baltic Journal of Management , Volume 18 (1): 15 – Jan 2, 2023
Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/burden-or-opportunity-the-role-of-employees-regulatory-focus-in-kHEzW7i98j
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1746-5265
DOI
10.1108/bjm-11-2021-0410
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The potential contradictory impact of empowering leadership may obfuscate its effectiveness. Empowering leadership is characterized not only by increased employees' autonomy but also by additional responsibilities and work demands, which may trigger different motivational processes for employees and lead to different perceptions of job stressors. This research aims to explore such contradictory impacts of empowering leadership on employees' perceived stressors by clarifying the complex motivational processes (intrinsic/extrinsic) experienced by employees when facing empowering leadership, as well as the boundary condition of employees' regulatory focus based on regulatory focus theory and self-determination theory (SDT).Design/methodology/approachThe authors examine the proposed theoretical model using a two-wave survey, with the data being collected from 294 employees working at a hotel in China.FindingsThe results show that both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation mediate the relationship between empowering leadership and employees' perceived stressors and demonstrate the moderating role of an employee's regulatory focus. Specifically, a high promotion focus strengthens the relationship between empowering leadership and intrinsic motivation, while a high prevention focus strengthens the relationship between empowering leadership and extrinsic motivation.Practical implicationsManagers should consider the attributes of front-line service employees (e.g. are they promotion-focused or prevention-focused?) when demonstrating empowering leadership to prevent employees from misinterpreting that leadership as a source of stress.Originality/valueThis research helps to reconcile previously conflicting findings on empowering leadership by clarifying the complex motivational processes behind it. Furthermore, this research adopts a regulatory focus perspective to suggest that the reason why employees respond to their leaders differently is inherently associated with each employee's motivational tendencies.

Journal

Baltic Journal of Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 2, 2023

Keywords: Empowering leadership; Promotion focus; Prevention focus; Motivational process; Perceived stressors

References

  • To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance
    Ahearne, M.; Mathieu, J.; Rapp, A.
  • Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially
    Ariely, D.; Bracha, A.; Meier, S.
  • The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors
    Arnold, J.A.; Arad, S.; Rhoades, J.A.; Drasgow, F.
  • Job stress, mental health and job satisfaction among UK senior nurses
    Baglioni, A.J.; Cooper, C.L.; Hingley, P.
  • Leadership style and regulatory mode: value from fit?
    Benjamin, L.; Flynn, F.J.
  • Regulatory focus at work: the moderating role of regulatory focus in the job demands-resources model
    Brenninkmeijer, V.; Demerouti, E.; le Blanc, P.M.; van Emmerik, I.H.
  • Regulatory focus theory: implications for the study of emotions at work
    Brockner, J.; Higgins, E.T.
  • Ethical leadership: a review and future directions
    Brown, M.E.; Treviño, L.K.
  • Linking empowering leadership and employee work engagement: the effects of person-job fit, person-group fit, and proactive personality
    Cai, D.; Cai, Y.; Sun, Y.; Ma, J.
  • Ethical champions, emotions, framing, and team ethical decision making
    Chen, A.; Treviño, L.K.; Humphrey, S.E.
  • Two faces of empowering leadership: enabling and burdening
    Cheong, M.; Spain, S.M.; Yammarino, F.J.; Yun, S.
  • The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice
    Conger, J.A.; Kanungo, R.N.
  • The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality
    Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M.
  • Reducing conflict-related employee strain: the benefits of an internal locus of control and a problem-solving conflict management strategy
    Dijkstra, M.T.; Beersma, B.; Evers, A.
  • Managing from the boundary: the effective leadership of self-managing work teams
    Druskat, V.U.; Wheeler, J.V.
  • Revisions and further developments of the Occupational Stress Indicator: LISREL results from four Dutch studies
    Evers, A.; Frese, M.; Cooper, C.L.
  • How can managers reduce employee intention to quit?
    Firth, L.; Mellor, D.J.; Moore, K.A.; Loquet, C.
  • The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions
    Fredrickson, B.L.
  • Self-determination theory and work motivation
    Gagné, M.; Deci, E.L.
  • An index and test of linear moderated mediation
    Hayes, A.F.
  • Beyond pleasure and pain
    Higgins, E.T.
  • Empowering leadership in hospitality and tourism management: a systematic literature review
    Hoang, G.; Wilson-Evered, E.; Lockstone-Binney, L.; Luu, T.T.
  • Mutuality in leader–subordinate empowerment expectation: its impact on role ambiguity and intrinsic motivation
    Humborstad, S.I.W.; Kuvaas, B.
  • Job stress and burnout among Canadian managers and nurses: an empirical examination
    Jamal, M.; Baba, V.V.
  • Behavioral economics and psychology of incentives
    Kamenica, E.
  • Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: the role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes
    Kark, R.; Van Dijk, D.
  • Employee responses to empowering leadership: a meta-analysis
    Kim, M.; Beehr, T.A.; Prewett, M.S.
  • Beyond self-management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment
    Kirkman, B.L.; Rosen, B.
  • Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: the roles of pay administration and pay level
    Kuvaas, B.
  • Perceived investment in employee development, intrinsic motivation and work performance
    Kuvaas, B.; Dysvik, A.
  • Effects of task autonomy on performance: an extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms
    Langfred, C.W.; Moye, N.A.
  • Empowering leadership: a meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation
    Lee, A.; Willis, S.; Tian, A.W.
  • Motivation, overtraining, and burnout: can self-determined motivation predict overtraining and burnout in elite athletes?
    Lemyre, P.N.; Roberts, G.C.; Stray-Gundersen, J.
  • Directive versus empowering leadership: a field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity
    Martin, S.L.; Liao, H.; Campbell, E.M.
  • Delivering customer-oriented behaviour through empowerment: an empirical test of HRM assumptions
    Peccei, R.; Rosenthal, P.
  • Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects
    Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W.
  • Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies
    Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P.
  • Cultural values as moderators of employee reactions to job insecurity: the role of individualism and collectivism
    Probst, T.M.; Lawler, J.
  • Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions
    Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L.
  • Exploring the impact of decentralized leadership on knowledge sharing and work hindrance networks in healthcare teams
    Scheuer, C.L.; Voltan, A.; Kumanan, K.; Chakraborty, S.
  • Leveraging leaders: a literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research
    Sharma, P.N.; Kirkman, B.L.
  • Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: a regulatory focus perspective
    Van Dijk, D.; Kluger, A.N.
  • When does procedural fairness promote organizational citizenship behavior? Integrating empowering leadership types in relational justice models
    Van Dijke, M.; De Cremer, D.; Mayer, D.M.; Van Quaquebeke, N.
  • A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance
    Wallace, C.; Chen, G.
  • Technical systems development risk factors: the role of empowering leadership in lowering developers’ stress
    Windeler, J.B.; Maruping, L.; Venkatesh, V.
  • Exploring the impact of shared leadership on management team member job outcomes
    Wood, M.S.; Fields, D.
  • Understanding self-perception accuracy: implications for human resource management
    Yammarino, F.J.; Atwater, L.E.
  • Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement
    Zhang, X.; Bartol, K.M.