Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Taylor-Gooby (2008)
Trust and Welfare State Reform: The Example of the NHSSocial Policy & Administration, 42
J. Newman (2007)
The 'double dynamics' of activation: institutions, citizens and the remaking of welfare governance.International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27
J. Brudney, R. England (1983)
Toward a Definition of the Coproduction ConceptPublic Administration Review, 43
A. Ho, K. Chan (2010)
The social impact of work-integration social enterprise in Hong KongInternational Social Work, 53
G. Wilson (1994)
Co‐Production and Self‐Care: New Approaches to Managing Community Care Services for Older People1Social Policy & Administration, 28
Joost Fledderus (2015)
Does User Co-Production of Public Service Delivery Increase Satisfaction and Trust? Evidence From a Vignette ExperimentInternational Journal of Public Administration, 38
Joost Fledderus, T. Brandsen, M. Honingh (2014)
Restoring Trust Through the Co-Production of Public Services: A theoretical elaborationPublic Management Review, 16
Paul DiMaggio, W. Powell (1983)
THE IRON CAGE REVISITED:The New Economic Sociology
R. Hazenberg, F. Seddon, S. Denny (2014)
Investigating the Outcome Performance of Work-Integration Social Enterprises (Wises): Do WISEs offer ‘added value’ to NEETs?Public Management Review, 16
S. Walle, G. Bouckaert (2003)
Public Service Performance and Trust in Government: The Problem of CausalityInternational Journal of Public Administration, 26
H. Boeije (2002)
A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative InterviewsQuality and Quantity, 36
T. Brandsen, J. Helderman (2012)
The Trade-Off Between Capital and Community: The Conditions for Successful Co-production in HousingVOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23
T. Bovaird (2007)
Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public ServicesPublic Administration Review, 67
D. Cepiku, Filippo Giordano (2014)
Co-Production in Developing Countries: Insights from the community health workers experiencePublic Management Review, 16
R. Berkel (2014)
Quasi-markets and the Delivery of Activation – A Frontline PerspectiveSocial Policy & Administration, 48
T. Judge, A. Erez, J. Bono, Carl Thoresen (2002)
Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct?Journal of personality and social psychology, 83 3
J. Rotter (1966)
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological monographs, 80 1
C. Lindsay, S. Osborne, Sue Bond (2014)
The 'new public governance' and employability services in an era of crisis: challenges for third sector organisations in ScotlandPublic Administration, 92
R. Lewicki, Edward Tomlinson, N. Gillespie (2006)
Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Evidence, and Future DirectionsJournal of Management, 32
U. Scholz, Benicio Doña, Shonali Sud, R. Schwarzer (2002)
Is General Self-Efficacy a Universal Construct?1European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18
E. Ostrom (2000)
Collective action and the evolution of social normsJournal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 6
E. Deci, J. Connell, R. Ryan (1989)
Self-determination in a work organization.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74
R. Berkel (2009)
The Provision of Income Protection and Activation Services for the Unemployed in ‘Active’ Welfare States. An International ComparisonJournal of Social Policy, 39
Paul Spector (1988)
Development of the Work Locus of Control ScaleJournal of occupational psychology, 61
Joost Fledderus, T. Brandsen, M. Honingh (2015)
User co-production of public service delivery: An uncertainty approachPublic Policy and Administration, 30
R. Simmons (2011)
Leadership and Listening: The Reception of User Voice in Today's Public ServicesSocial Policy & Administration, 45
D. Rousseau, S. Sitkin, R. Burt, Colin Camerer (1998)
Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of TrustAcademy of Management Review, 23
Benjamin Clark, J. Brudney, Sung-Gheel Jang (2013)
Coproduction of Government Services and the New Information Technology: Investigating the Distributional BiasesPublic Administration Review, 73
Catherine Needham (2008)
Realising the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improvements in Public ServicesSocial Policy and Society, 7
M. Barnes (1999)
Users as citizens: collective action and the local governance of welfareSocial Policy & Administration, 33
A. Renedo, C. Marston, Dimitrios Spyridonidis, J. Barlow (2015)
Patient and Public Involvement in Healthcare Quality Improvement: How organizations can help patients and professionals to collaboratePublic Management Review, 17
P. Robertson, S. Tang (1995)
The Role of Commitment in Collective Action: Comparing the Organizational Behavior and Rational Choice PerspectivesPublic Administration Review, 55
K. Breidahl, S. Clement (2010)
Does Active Labour Market Policy have an Impact on Social MarginalizationSocial Policy & Administration, 44
M. Aiken, Ingo Bode (2009)
Killing the Golden Goose? Third Sector Organizations and Back‐to‐Work Programmes in Germany and the UKSocial Policy & Administration, 43
A. Bandura (1999)
Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective.Annual review of psychology, 52
T. Brandsen, M. Honingh (2016)
Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical DefinitionsPublic Administration Review, 76
F. Weil, R. Putnam (1994)
Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.Contemporary Sociology, 23
Tim Reeskens, M. Hooghe (2007)
Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of generalized trust. Evidence from the European Social Survey (2002 and 2004)Social Indicators Research, 85
C. Offe (1999)
How Can We Trust Our Fellow Citizens
Morten Jakobsen, S. Andersen (2013)
Coproduction and Equity in Public Service DeliveryPublic Administration Review, 73
E. Ostrom (1996)
Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and developmentWorld Development, 24
C. Eijk, T. Steen (2014)
Why People Co-Produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care servicesPublic Management Review, 16
Joost Fledderus, M. Honingh (2016)
Why people co-produce within activation services: the necessity of motivation and trust – an investigation of selection biases in a municipal activation programme in the NetherlandsInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 82
Purpose – Co-production of public service delivery is believed to foster trust among users, but little empirical work is devoted to this assumption. Public sector organizations have therefore little knowledge about the conditions that determine whether co-production leads to trust. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – A longitudinal mixed method is used, following participants of a co-produced activation programme over time ( n =60). Quantitative methods are employed to investigate changes in trust levels, whereas qualitative methods are used to explain these changes and explore conditions for trust-building. Findings – After a half year, trust in the service provider, trust in local government and generalized trust decreased significantly among co-producing participants. Particularly, a decrease in trust in fellow participants strongly related to decreases in trust in the service provider and generalized trust. Qualitative evidence indicate that motivation during the co-production decreased, as well as personal control. Organizational support and user commitment show to be important conditions for building trust. Research limitations/implications – The study draws upon a small sample, limiting possibilities for statistical analysis. Also, comparison with other types of service delivery is required to safely assign the effects to co-production. Originality/value – Longitudinal studies on co-production are rarely performed. Additionally, the findings indicate a more critical approach to the effects of co-production, which are often assumed to be positive for the public sector and citizens.
International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 12, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.