Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Black, A. Cresswell, T. Pardo, Fiona Thompson, Donna Canestraro, Meghan Cook, L. Luna-Reyes, I. Martinez, D. Andersen, George Richardson (2003)
A dynamic theory of collaboration: a structural approach to facilitating intergovernmental use of information technology36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the
L. Hanifan (1916)
The Rural School Community CenterThe ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67
David Cooperrider, D. Whitney (2005)
Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change
R. Burt (2004)
The Social Structure of Competition
Dawn Nothwehr (2004)
Mutuality and Mission: A No "Other" WayMission Studies, 21
B. Somekh (1994)
Inhabiting Each Other's Castles: towards knowledge and mutual growth through collaborationEducational Action Research, 2
N. Franz (2003)
Transformative Learning in Extension Staff Partnerships: Facilitating Personal, Joint, and Organizational ChangeThe Journal of Extension, 41
K. Pigg, L. Crank (2004)
Building Community Social Capital: The Potential and Promise of Information and Communications TechnologiesJ. Community Informatics, 1
David Cooperrider (1999)
Positive Image, Positive Action: The Affirmative Basis of Organizing
E. Schein (1987)
The clinical perspective in fieldwork
David Cooperrider, Jacqueline Stavros, D. Whitney, Ronald Fly (2005)
Appreciative inquiry handbook : the first in a series of AI workbooks for leaders of change
Soumyananda Dinda (2007)
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital and Economic Growth: A Productive Consumption ApproachMacroeconomics: Consumption
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the ecology of collaboration between school and university partners using an appreciative inquiry theoretical perspective and to demonstrate how it enhances the social capital in school and university partnerships. Design/methodology/approach – A case study of a partnership of an inner‐city high school and university doctoral action research was explored in the frameworks of mutuality, social capital, and appreciative inquiry. The theoretical perspective of appreciative inquiry served as the basis for the mutuality between administrators and faculty in the inner‐city high school and the doctoral action research team. Findings – Findings suggest that approaching school‐university partnerships through an appreciative inquiry theoretical perspective creates an environment for building trust, sharing knowledge, and increasing bridging capital, thus benefiting both the school and university. Originality/value – The action research team formed a partnership with teachers and administrators. The action research was transformed by the partnership and reports showed substantial progress in student achievement scores in mathematics and science. Hopefully, some of that achievement can be attributed to the research and the paper on which it is based.
International Journal of Educational Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2006
Keywords: Action research; Case studies; Change management; Educational institutions; Social values
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.