Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

British Food Journal Volume 70 Issue 4 1968

British Food Journal Volume 70 Issue 4 1968 We can think of those with a cynical turn of mind who might consider not a little of the present output of the parliamentary machine as harem scarem law, but the indecent haste, the freak urgency of some politically inspired laws apart, it is only too obvious that law is being made under rush conditions, and the reasons are not far to seek. A hectic, overactive party executive, feverishly pushing ahead with its policies produces impossible working conditions for the parliamentary draftsmen. Law, whether it is statute or regulation, has never been more complex than it is today time allowed for parliamentary debate is completely inadequate too many and varied interests have to be taken into account, to say nothing of the vast range of delegated legislation. The urgency of some legislation is doubtful it is difficult to see the need for all the hurry a little more time in proper debate would prevent some of the loopholes which subsequently appear and render the law more comprehensible incomprehensibility and justice are rarely compatible. As Diplock L J., said in the Court of Appeal in Rex. v. Industrial Injuries Commissioner ex parte Cable 1968 1 A.E.R., 9, a few months agoJudges have been at their wits' end to know what some of the provisions mean. It would be a good thing if time could be found to remedy the blemishes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png British Food Journal Emerald Publishing

British Food Journal Volume 70 Issue 4 1968

British Food Journal , Volume 70 (4): 32 – Apr 1, 1968
Download PDF
30 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/british-food-journal-volume-70-issue-4-1968-TeC4JhvRfs

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0007-070X
DOI
10.1108/eb011664
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We can think of those with a cynical turn of mind who might consider not a little of the present output of the parliamentary machine as harem scarem law, but the indecent haste, the freak urgency of some politically inspired laws apart, it is only too obvious that law is being made under rush conditions, and the reasons are not far to seek. A hectic, overactive party executive, feverishly pushing ahead with its policies produces impossible working conditions for the parliamentary draftsmen. Law, whether it is statute or regulation, has never been more complex than it is today time allowed for parliamentary debate is completely inadequate too many and varied interests have to be taken into account, to say nothing of the vast range of delegated legislation. The urgency of some legislation is doubtful it is difficult to see the need for all the hurry a little more time in proper debate would prevent some of the loopholes which subsequently appear and render the law more comprehensible incomprehensibility and justice are rarely compatible. As Diplock L J., said in the Court of Appeal in Rex. v. Industrial Injuries Commissioner ex parte Cable 1968 1 A.E.R., 9, a few months agoJudges have been at their wits' end to know what some of the provisions mean. It would be a good thing if time could be found to remedy the blemishes.

Journal

British Food Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Apr 1, 1968

There are no references for this article.