Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Clayton Christensen, M. Verlinden, G. Westerman (2002)
Disruption, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiabilityIndustrial and Corporate Change, 11
Carliss Baldwin, K. Clark (1997)
Managing in an age of modularity.Harvard business review, 75 5
Allan Afuah (2001)
Dynamic Boundaries of the Firm: Are Firms Better Off Being Vertically Integrated in the Face of a Technological Change?Academy of Management Journal, 44
W. Abernathy, J. Utterback (1978)
Patterns of Industrial InnovationTechnology Review, 80
D. Teece (1993)
Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policyResearch Policy, 15
D. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen (1997)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTStrategic Management Journal, 18
R. Henderson, K. Clark (1990)
Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of
Purpose – This paper seeks to support and extend other scholars’ examinations of the evolution of technological modularity, vertical specialization and the concepts of the drivers of change in the basis of competition through an analysis of the evolution of the mobile phone industry. Design/methodology/approach – A two‐year research project was undertaken and in‐depth interviews took place with managers at companies that were responsible for developing the value chain approaches of their firms. Companies were identified from the existing body of literature, observation and personal contact. Additionally, data were collected from developing case studies. Findings – The paper finds that the mobile phone industry value chain is in the process of deconstructing towards more horizontally stratified structures for some device segments. But, unlike the PC industry, an industry which many analysts suggest provides a precedent for likely evolution of the mobile phone value chain, this trend will not be uniform or consistent across different product types. This will require mobile phone manufacturers to adapt their organizational structures and value chain approaches accordingly, and to rethink the basis for future competitive advantage. Research limitations/implications – As the research is based on interviews with a limited number of firms within the extended mobile handset industry value chain, it cannot be suggested that the impact of trends identified has equal impact for all firms. Practical implications – Mobile handset vendors should learn from the PC industry and make sure that their future strategies are not made simply on the basis of cost optimization or speed to market. Originality/value – The paper fulfils an identified need to understand how industry structures are evolving in one of the most dynamic sectors in the world.
Info – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 27, 2008
Keywords: Competitive strategy; Mobile communications systems; Wireless; Telecommunication; Technology led strategy; Marketing strategy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.