Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Rose (1996)
The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of governmentEconomy and Society, 25
S. Lamble (2013)
Queer Necropolitics and the Expanding Carceral State: Interrogating Sexual Investments in PunishmentLaw and Critique, 24
Psykhe (Santiago), 13
T. Davies, Arshad Isakjee, S. Dhesi (2017)
Violent Inaction: The Necropolitical Experience of Refugees in EuropeAntipode, 49
D. Fassin (2009)
Another Politics of Life is PossibleTheory, Culture & Society, 26
Christine Sylvester (2006)
Bare life as a development/postcolonial problematic.The Geographical Journal, 172
Liliana Monroy, M. Montenegro, J. Pujol (2015)
Miradas, formas de hacer y relaciones en la constitución de una investigación crítica.Universitas Psychologica, 14
Race & Class, 54
Sandra Harding (1986)
The science question in feminism
T. Sloan (2000)
Critical psychology : voices for change
C. Schurr (2017)
From biopolitics to bioeconomies: The ART of (re-)producing white futures in Mexico's surrogacy marketEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35
P. Tirado (2011)
Identidades transculturales e intersección de las relaciones de opresión. Una propuesta teórica y militante. BRAH, Avtar. 2011. Cartografías de la diáspora. Identidades en cuestión. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños., 20
Clay Cade (2017)
Imperialism, Self Determination, and the Failure of the Nation State: European Influence in the Middle East at the Turn of the Nineteenth Century, 1
N. Rose (2000)
Government and controlBritish Journal of Criminology, 40
Christen Smith (2016)
Facing the Dragon: Black Mothering, Sequelae, and Gendered Necropolitics in the AmericasTransforming Anthropology, 24
Public Culture, 15
Elizabeth Povinelli (2011)
Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism
M. Cooper (2008)
Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era
Gloria Anzaldúa (1987)
Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza
Feminist Studies, 14
Dairo Mojica (2007)
Reseña de "EL GIRO DECOLONIAL. REFLEXIONES PARA UNA DIVERSIDAD EPISTÉMICA MÁS ALLÁ DEL CAPITALISMO GLOBAL" de Santiago Castro-Gómez y Ramón Grosfoguel (Eds.)
I. Parker (2015)
Introduction: principles and positions
Sandro Mezzadra, Brett Neilson (2013)
Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor
Étienne Balibar, James Swenson (2009)
We, the People of Europe?: Reflections on Transnational Citizenship
Rachel Shields, Joshua Newman, Christopher Mcleod (2014)
Life in Three DeathsCultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 14
C. Mohanty (2003)
Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity
M. Montero (2004)
Relations Between Community- Social Psychology, Critical- Social Psychology, and Social Psychology of Liberation: A Latin American AnswerPsykhe (santiago), 13
PurposeContemporary governmentality combines biopolitical and necropolitical logics to establish social, political and physical borders that classify and stratify populations using symbolic and material marks as, for example, nationality, gender, ethnicity, race, sexuality, social class and/or disability. The social sciences have been prolific in the analysis of alterities and, in turn, implicated in the epistemologies and knowledge practices that underpin and sustain the multiplication of frontiers that define essential differences between populations. The purpose of this paper is to develop a strategy that analyze and subvert the logic of bordering inherent in the bio/necropolitical gaze. In different ways, this paper examines operations of delimitation and differentiation that contribute to monolithic definitions of subject and subjectivity.Design/methodology/approachThe authors question border construction processes in terms of their static, homogenizing and exclusionary effects.FindingsInstead of hierarchical stratification of populations, the papers in this special issue explore the possibilities of relationship and the conditions of such relationships. Who do we relate to? On which terms and conditions? With what purpose? In which ethical and political manner?Originality/valueA critical understanding of the asymmetry in research practices makes visible how the researcher is legitimized to produce a representation of those researched, an interpretation of their words and actions without feedback or contribution to the specific context where the research has been carried out. Deconstructive and relational perspectives are put forward as critical strands that can set the basis of different approaches to research and social practice.
Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 14, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.